Oldham BBC website highlights

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:29 pm

Just seen the highlights now from the game.

They didn't show the off the ball incident that resulted in Hartley being sent off because it was off camera. :roll:

Compo · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:30 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Just seen the highlights now from the game.

They didn't show the off the ball incident that resulted in Hartley being sent off because it was off camera. :roll:

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Just seen the highlights now from the game.

They didn't show the off the ball incident that resulted in Hartley being sent off because it was off camera. :roll:

How could the cameras show it if it was off camera?

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:38 pm

Well, cameras today aren't static, they can be turned around, but it seems the cameraman was too slow in catching what happened.

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:02 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Well, cameras today aren't static, they can be turned around.

When did this ground breaking technology occur? I must have missed it. rolfl

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:05 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Well, cameras today aren't static, they can be turned around, but it seems the cameraman was too slow in catching what happened.

Surely that would result in a shot of the camera mans face?

I'm not sure that would shed any light into the incident to be honest.

Compo · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:19 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Well, cameras today aren't static, they can be turned around, but it seems the cameraman was too slow in catching what happened.

surely the cameraman cant be at fault here, there is only one camera at pools from the Cyrill, his job is to follow the ball and the action, this incident happened off the ball, its not sky you know were there are about 20 different cameras all over the ground.

I was there on Saturday and I didnt even seen it.

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:24 pm

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:25 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

Just seen the highlights now from the game.

They didn't show the off the ball incident that resulted in Hartley being sent off because it was off camera. :roll:

At one stage a Pools player made a great off the ball run, or someone must off, but the camera missed that as well. rolfl

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Poolie of Kent wrote:

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

Jesus christ why do you care?

He was sent off, are you on a father dowling style mission to get him off with this red card?

Compo · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:26 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

No i forgot to take my tape measure to the match, you are expecting it to be sky when complaining about the bloke who is doing the job he is paid for, ie follow the action, not picking up on an off the ball incident that half the people in the ground missed.

Poolie of Kent · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:29 pm

But it's 2010: with all this technology around, I think incidents like this should really be picked up.

threepintwonder · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:29 pm

Compo wrote:

Poolie of Kent wrote:

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

No i forgot to take my tape measure to the match, you are expecting it to be sky when complaining about the bloke who is doing the job he is paid for, ie follow the action, not picking up on an off the ball incident that half the people in the ground missed.

if you took your tape measure would you measure in ft and inches or metric?

Compo · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:31 pm

threepintwonder wrote:

Compo wrote:

Poolie of Kent wrote:

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

No i forgot to take my tape measure to the match, you are expecting it to be sky when complaining about the bloke who is doing the job he is paid for, ie follow the action, not picking up on an off the ball incident that half the people in the ground missed.

if you took your tape measure would you measure in ft and inches or metric?

Hands I am proper old school

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:31 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

I'm not expecting it to be Sky.

Does anyone know exactly far the incident was from the referee calling Hartley over to sending him off?

Within 113 yards maximum. The length of Pools' pitch if Hartley was on one goal line and the referee was a little behind play being on the other goal line. Or alternately 77yards if Hartley was on one touchline and the referee on the other. Or a matter of inches.

HTH

Compo · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:32 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

But it's 2010: with all this technology around, I think incidents like this should really be picked up.

Who is going to pay for this technology, Jesus your complaining about something you got for Free, give your head and hat a shake.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Compo wrote:

Poolie of Kent wrote:

But it's 2010: with all this technology around, I think incidents like this should really be picked up.

Who is going to pay for this technology, Jesus your complaining about something you got for Free, give your head and hat a shake.

How do you block someone again?

Fetish_Bob · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:04 pm

Poolie of Kent wrote:

But it's 2010: with all this technology around, I think incidents like this should really be picked up.

There's a hell of a lot of CCTV technology about and that still manages to miss muggers/ robbers and other scum bags doing illegal activities. So what's your point?? I would rather that was picked up.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:12 pm

chip fireball wrote:

[ x ] thread of the year. pure comedy gold. rolfl

[x] Chip is right

chessington · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:39 pm

my wife wants to know what i'm crying on the floor with laughter at.............Mr POK, you make my day. Thank you.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:12 pm

Same here....our lass behind me telling me something and I just burst out laughing whilst shaking my head in disbelief!!!! :laugh:

Our lass....'what you laughing for....I was been serious!!!! sadx

Me....'I'm not laughing at what you said....I'm laughing at POK'!!!! :laugh:

Our lass....'Is that the Rarf from Kent'????

Me....'Yes'!!!! :laugh:

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:14 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

Same here....our lass behind me telling me something and I just burst out laughing whilst shaking my head in disbelief!!!! :laugh:

Our lass....'what you laughing for....I was been serious!!!! sadx

Me....'I'm not laughing at what you said....I'm laughing at POK'!!!! :laugh:

Our lass....'Is that the Rarf from Kent'????

Me....'Yes'!!!! :laugh:

Oldham BBC website highlights

Gadgies online