Line-Up: Limbricks likely lads

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

sorry lads the board wont allow me to upload the team sheet.

Attachment:

IMG_5924.jpeg

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

https://x.com/Official_HUFC/status/1908 ... gr%5Etweet

loyal_fan · **Joined:** Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:15 pm **Posts:** 3786

Shame no Mancini or Dodds still

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Leggie43 wrote:

https://x.com/Official_HUFC/status/1908504899538792799?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Well done Leggie lad clappp

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

loyal_fan wrote:

Shame no Mancini or Dodds still

Hopefully they wont be needed against this really piss poor Sunday league team. The lads better perform after losing to this lot earlier in the season. :laugh:

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Leggie43 wrote:

:angry-tappingfoot:

Aye tried to upload it and got error message, Attachment limit had been reached, Or words to that effect.

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Leggie43 wrote:

loyal_fan wrote:

Shame no Mancini or Dodds still

Hopefully they wont be needed against this really piss poor Sunday league team. The lads better perform after losing to this lot earlier in the season. :laugh:

Not going to underestimate this lot mrself.

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

https://x.com/Official_HUFC/status/1908504899538792799?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Well done Leggie lad clappp

I am clueless at this technology crap but it worked this time. :laugh:

Happy to help Gray.

Kettering Poolie · **Posted:** Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:09 pm

Is it that Mr Smithers' first Unchanged line up?

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

loyal_fan wrote:

Shame no Mancini or Dodds still

Hopefully they wont be needed against this really piss poor Sunday league team. The lads better perform after losing to this lot earlier in the season. :laugh:

Not going to underestimate this lot mrself.

Thats exactly the problem with supporting Pools over many many years we are petrified to think positively. I know exactly where your coming from Gray but fook it mate surely its time for them to beat the shit teams and finally give us long long suffering fans some hope.

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

:angry-tappingfoot:

Aye tried to upload it and got error message, Attachment limit had been reached, Or words to that effect.

Kennybottles said yesterday that this problem is due to the maga long running post at the top of the board that is on 254 pages and when it hits 255 the site will go tits up or something along those lines. It sounds like that post need a few pages deleting or something. A few are having the same problem as you this week. I dont understand any of it but hey. :laugh:

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

:angry-tappingfoot:

Aye tried to upload it and got error message, Attachment limit had been reached, Or words to that effect.

Kennybottles said yesterday that this problem is due to the maga long running post at the top of the board that is on 254 pages and when it hits 255 the site will go tits up or something along those lines. It sounds like that post need a few pages deleting or something. A few are having the same problem as you this week. I dont understand any of it but hey. :laugh:

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Double post banghead

Stocksfield_Poolie · **Joined:** Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:29 pm **Posts:** 937

Just show the lads in the changing room, highlights of the game where Ebbsfleet beat us 1-0, if that doesn't stir them up to go and thrash them, nothing will!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLmCMf8k0eY

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

fixed. Theres a total attachment setting in the configuration that was set to 1000mb, I’ve changed it to 10’000. As it’s taken 20 years to reach 1000 there shouldn’t be a repeat of the problem anytime soon.

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Mr Irrelevant wrote:

fixed. Theres a total attachment setting in the configuration that was set to 1000mb, I’ve changed it to 10’000. As it’s taken 20 years to reach 1000 there shouldn’t be a repeat of the problem anytime soon.

Thank You MrI
Hope you are back at it soon. clappp

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Leggie43 wrote:

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

loyal_fan wrote:

Shame no Mancini or Dodds still

Hopefully they wont be needed against this really piss poor Sunday league team. The lads better perform after losing to this lot earlier in the season. :laugh:

Not going to underestimate this lot mrself.

Thats exactly the problem with supporting Pools over many many years we are petrified to think positively. I know exactly where your coming from Gray but fook it mate surely its time for them to beat the shit teams and finally give us long long suffering fans some hope.

When the time comes, When all the Bunkerites line Clarence Rd to bid Raj a fond farewell refred

Thats when me positivity kicks in, JokeKing apart we really should be enjoying this afternoon.

Grayhoundend · **Joined:** Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:13 pm **Posts:** 6989

Stocksfield_Poolie wrote:

Just show the lads in the changing room, highlights of the game where Ebbsfleet beat us 1-0, if that doesn't stir them up to go and thrash them, nothing will!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLmCMf8k0eY

That was the evening i posted Sarll OUT, Absolute disgrace that day.

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Mr Irrelevant wrote:

fixed. Theres a total attachment setting in the configuration that was set to 1000mb, I’ve changed it to 10’000. As it’s taken 20 years to reach 1000 there shouldn’t be a repeat of the problem anytime soon.

loyal_fan · **Joined:** Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:15 pm **Posts:** 3786

1-0 up after Ebbsfleet looked more likely---If Cleary isnt a cheat code at this level am not sure what is.

Will be at Stockport next year

MutleyRules · **Joined:** Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:38 am **Posts:** 1135

Mr Irrelevant wrote:

fixed. Theres a total attachment setting in the configuration that was set to 1000mb, I’ve changed it to 10’000. As it’s taken 20 years to reach 1000 there shouldn’t be a repeat of the problem anytime soon.

Hope you are feeling better John.

Kenny Bottles · **Posted:** Sat Apr 05, 2025 5:21 pm

Leggie43 wrote:

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

:angry-tappingfoot:

Aye tried to upload it and got error message, Attachment limit had been reached, Or words to that effect.

Kennybottles said yesterday that this problem is due to the maga long running post at the top of the board that is on 254 pages and when it hits 255 the site will go tits up or something along those lines. It sounds like that post need a few pages deleting or something. A few are having the same problem as you this week. I dont understand any of it but hey. :laugh:

That's not exactly what I said. The problem with posters not being able to upload attachments is one problem - which reminded me that another potential (and similar) problem might occur soon due to a default limit on the number of pages allowed on a thread. I've been posting on the "Word Association" thread recently, and the number of pages caught my eye as I'm a bit of a computer geek, and someone who recognises the significance of the number 256*

Mr I has confirmed that there was a maximum amount of computer memory set for attachments which he has updated, so that problem is now fixed. But there will also (probably) be a default number of maximum pages per topic - which on another web-forum I am a member of is set to 256* pages and that has caused problems for the owner of the site.

I would therefore recommend as a precaution that Mr I checks that setting before we get to page 256* otherwise it could cause problems.

Regards, Sir Kenneth of Bottles.

*256 is a throwback to ancient 8-bit computers as it's the first decimal number you need 9 bits to represent in binary rather than 8 (or fewer). But depending upon when the board software was first written, and/or which computer language it was written in, and/or the age of the programmer(s) who wrote it, it is often still used as a default value.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Thanks but we’re on page 1434 already in this forum. I set it to 999999 from day one. In terms of posts in a given topic there is no specific limit although when a topic gets very very long it can obviously slow loading time.

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Kenny Bottles wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

Grayhoundend wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

:angry-tappingfoot:

Aye tried to upload it and got error message, Attachment limit had been reached, Or words to that effect.

Kennybottles said yesterday that this problem is due to the maga long running post at the top of the board that is on 254 pages and when it hits 255 the site will go tits up or something along those lines. It sounds like that post need a few pages deleting or something. A few are having the same problem as you this week. I dont understand any of it but hey. :laugh:

That's not exactly what I said. The problem with posters not being able to upload attachments is one problem - which reminded me that another potential (and similar) problem might occur soon due to a default limit on the number of pages allowed on a thread. I've been posting on the "Word Association" thread recently, and the number of pages caught my eye as I'm a bit of a computer geek, and someone who recognises the significance of the number 256*

Mr I has confirmed that there was a maximum amount of computer memory set for attachments which he has updated, so that problem is now fixed. But there will also (probably) be a default number of maximum pages per topic - which on another web-forum I am a member of is set to 256* pages and that has caused problems for the owner of the site.

I would therefore recommend as a precaution that Mr I checks that setting before we get to page 256* otherwise it could cause problems.

Regards, Sir Kenneth of Bottles.

*256 is a throwback to ancient 8-bit computers as it's the first decimal number you need 9 bits to represent in binary rather than 8 (or fewer). But depending upon when the board software was first written, and/or which computer language it was written in, and/or the age of the programmer(s) who wrote it, it is often still used as a default value.

Apologies Kenny my mistake mate.

Kenny Bottles · **Posted:** Sat Apr 05, 2025 5:48 pm

Mr Irrelevant wrote:

Thanks but we’re on page 1434 already in this forum. I set it to 999999 from day one. In terms of posts in a given topic there is no specific limit although when a topic gets very very long it can obviously slow loading time.

Sound, just thought I'd mention it as I've seen it happen.

Looks like I was being a bit "millennium bug" after all..!

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36922

Kenny Bottles wrote:

Mr Irrelevant wrote:

Thanks but we’re on page 1434 already in this forum. I set it to 999999 from day one. In terms of posts in a given topic there is no specific limit although when a topic gets very very long it can obviously slow loading time.

Sound, just thought I'd mention it as I've seen it happen.

Looks like I was being a bit "millennium bug" after all..!

You are now officially a virus. bbolt

Kenny Bottles · **Posted:** Sat Apr 05, 2025 5:56 pm

Leggie43 wrote:

Apologies Kenny my mistake mate.

No need mate. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to computers (and electronics) and can talk shite about them for hours.

Our lass got sick of all my gadgets, and agreed I could have the back bedroom for a "man-cave" about 5 years ago.

I only come out when I need a shite or me dinner's ready...

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

Kenny Bottles wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

Apologies Kenny my mistake mate.

No need mate. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to computers (and electronics) and can talk shite about them for hours.

Our lass got sick of all my gadgets, and agreed I could have the back bedroom for a "man-cave" about 5 years ago.

I only come out when I need a shite or me dinner's ready...

accrington fan · **Joined:** Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm **Posts:** 19276

Kenny Bottles wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

Apologies Kenny my mistake mate.

No need mate. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to computers (and electronics) and can talk shite about them for hours.

Our lass got sick of all my gadgets, and agreed I could have the back bedroom for a "man-cave" about 5 years ago.

I only come out when I need a shite or me dinner's ready...

really wish i was the same. seen others downloading from other sites and looks dead easy until i try and always forget one procedure to have to go back to square one till i lose my rag and stop. unlike other new subjects that come up or at school those who teach how to do this and that on computers seem the worse than on any other subject i have ever started to learn.

Kenny Bottles · **Posted:** Sun Apr 06, 2025 10:27 am

accrington fan wrote:

Kenny Bottles wrote:

Leggie43 wrote:

Apologies Kenny my mistake mate.

No need mate. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to computers (and electronics) and can talk shite about them for hours.

Our lass got sick of all my gadgets, and agreed I could have the back bedroom for a "man-cave" about 5 years ago.

I only come out when I need a shite or me dinner's ready...

really wish i was the same. seen others downloading from other sites and looks dead easy until i try and always forget one procedure to have to go back to square one till i lose my rag and stop. unlike other new subjects that come up or at school those who teach how to do this and that on computers seem the worse than on any other subject i have ever started to learn.

It's horses for courses Accy, and I was born with the "nerd" gene.

As a gadgie of a certain age, I should be able to fix any problem on a car - but I'm absolutely fucking useless.

I don't know me big ends from me bellend...

accrington fan · **Joined:** Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm **Posts:** 19276

i was always fine with cars until more electronics came into it. like computers i could never get my heard around them as you cannot see electricity and can only smell it if you cocked the job up.

Line-Up: Limbricks likely lads

Gadgies online