phil wrote:
Can the record show that this thread contains two arguments?
Argument one is because someone said people over the age of 60 are more likely to be racist.
Argument two is an older gentleman refusing to accept his language is racist.
Surreal.
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
Hang on a minute. I repeatedly asked for clarification as to what is or is not acceptable but it was like pulling teeth, until PJ put an article up for my attention. At that point I said I will not use words that offend people as it is not my intention to use officially designated offensive language to deliberately offend people. Therefore it is a bit rich and totally unfair for you to suggest that I am digging in and closing my eyes and mind.
There is not a man living or has lived on this planet that can put his hand on his heart and accuse me of deliberately racially abusing him, nor is there any man living that can point to a time at which I have deliberately racially abused a player at the VIC., including opposition players.
Sitting in the CK, which probably has the largest proportion of elderly folk, I can't recall any significant racial abuse or racial chanting. Perhaps others can point out to me when it has occurred.
I very rarely chant anything perhaps with the exception of Hartlepool and I've never chanted we hate darlo cos I don't hate our friends from down the road. I feel sorry for them but I don't hate them.
If everybody who goes to the VIC caused as much trouble as I do, we wouldn't be having this discussion.