Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:27 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 8:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:42 pm
Posts: 883
I thought the first 6 games looked very difficult when the fixtures were announced. We all must back the manager as his previous record looks very promising. I was reading about Crawley who have signed a similar amount of players at I think at higher cost and they are below us. If the players we have signed are the right ones they need time to gel and a striker or two to put the ball away. The midfield is cause for concern as they seem to be swamped putting extra pressure on the defence. Pase do not pull the trigger on the manager as has been done in the past as the problems will continue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
thank goodness rochdale kept stockdale after the end of last season. i,m sure he,d have been the number 1 choice to replace lee if he had been available then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 9:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 9530
Rochdale v Crawley next week.
So we cant go bottom.
:happy-wavemulticolor: :happy-bouncygreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 9:11 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
We need stability, like a ship hitting bad weather, some of the big girl’s blouses put their survival suits on and run about with the vapours till it calms down.
It’s now a case of ploughing on, turning a ship round 180 degrees in bad weather can be more traumatic than the bad weather. Try it.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 9:13 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
accrington fan wrote:
thank goodness rochdale kept stockdale after the end of last season. i,m sure he,d have been the number 1 choice to replace lee if he had been available then.

Some ‘experts’ on here were quite in love with idea of him coming here :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
snowy.."Some ‘experts’ on here were quite in love with idea of him coming here :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:"

..stockers was bookies odds on favorite for the pools job at one point..never get it wrong now do they?...still ...sure as a fully paid up member of the ex borer network gibbo will see him alright..or maybe higgy can help him out with a date at the longlands...up the borer... :laugh:

https://twitter.com/higs8/status/1506986638219653126


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22665
It takes time to stop the rot and put the playing side back on track and its not all about money. Man united are a perfect example of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
It takes time to stop the rot and put the playing side back on track and its not all about money. Man united are a perfect example of this.

unless you really hit lucky with recruitment on the cheap money has a big say in it. the reason i expect that hartley has missed out on some signings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:44 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
We are where we are, we’re Pool’s, apart from IOR, it’s been swimming against the tide, beats drowning though.
Even if we got a sugar daddy for life, the ‘Sirens of Doom’ would be wailing about some other aspect such as is the salmon in the sandwiches in the KPG Lounge of the at the new 45,000 seater stadium from natural sources or not..Endless posts on the topic would follow as accusations the new owner is using tinned salmon run riot…he has to go we need a new millionaire chairman.p they chunter :roll:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
Posts: 1278
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
It takes time to stop the rot and put the playing side back on track and its not all about money. Man united are a perfect example of this.


There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
Posts: 1278
Snowy wrote:
We are where we are, we’re Pool’s, apart from IOR, it’s been swimming against the tide, beats drowning though.
Even if we got a sugar daddy for life, the ‘Sirens of Doom’ would be wailing about some other aspect such as is the salmon in the sandwiches in the KPG Lounge of the at the new 45,000 seater stadium from natural sources or not..Endless posts on the topic would follow as accusations the new owner is using tinned salmon run riot…he has to go we need a new millionaire chairman.p they chunter :roll:


‘We’re Pools’ - right, so that means we just accept we’re completely shite does it. Yeah, good one mate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
[quote="Snowy"]We are where we are, we’re Pool’s, apart from IOR, it’s been swimming against the tide, beats drowning though.
whilst that is true and pools will always be pools it does not stop fans looking above rather than below. saying stuff like we could be york, darlo or scunthorpe can only be seen as wanting the club to be just better than them. better saying we should be looking at the likes of wycombe, morecambe and accrington for our future. Doubt the latter 2 could fit our fans in on an average day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
thebigdog wrote:
[

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.

getting and keeping a decent manager that fits the club certainly helps. doubt wycombe and accrington keep every player they wish to keep but have kept faith with the same manager for years to recruit decent replacements and beating the odds by playing infront of less home fans than pools do. just wonder if their sponsorships bring in more dosh than ours do also to make up the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:52 pm
Posts: 4448
thebigdog wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
It takes time to stop the rot and put the playing side back on track and its not all about money. Man united are a perfect example of this.


There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.


The club was on the up after the play offs, the ground was bouncing, some of the decisions since that day wouldn't of looked out of place by a Sunday morning pub team. Only at pools could we turn an exciting team into a bunch of no hopers within 6 months. It's probobly cost us more money neglecting the first team since that day than what it would of cost us by adding two or three decent players to what was a fairly good team.

Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
billyballs..."Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods."

.."decent money"?..here we go again..and as if you would know how much anyone at the club is being paid....more of the usual "more money at shields" crap..boring as f/k yawn1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:56 pm 
Online

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 7418
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:
thebigdog wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
It takes time to stop the rot and put the playing side back on track and its not all about money. Man united are a perfect example of this.


There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.


The club was on the up after the play offs, the ground was bouncing, some of the decisions since that day wouldn't of looked out of place by a Sunday morning pub team. Only at pools could we turn an exciting team into a bunch of no hopers within 6 months. It's probobly cost us more money neglecting the first team since that day than what it would of cost us by adding two or three decent players to what was a fairly good team.

Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods.


The Recruitment person, not all the signings were Hartley, I can’t see how a Recruitment Manager at Pools can be a full time job, once the transfer window closes what does he do ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:22 pm
Posts: 361
Location: Retford
Quote:
There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.



Not sure I'd put him in the brilliant category, we scraped up on penalties through the playoffs. Amazing we got up but we didn't smash the league did we


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
Bostonpoolie wrote:
[


Not sure I'd put him in the brilliant category, we scraped up on penalties through the playoffs. Amazing we got up but we didn't smash the league did we

a good run and for once luck was on the side of pools. how we got there doesn,t matter but i doubt any pools manager for years before and those since would have got us up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 1:12 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.


What planet are orbiting around…. Ground was bound to be full after you get promotion for the first month, check the stats……
The team was being slagged by the same people as the ‘left overs’ as all the best players had been snapped up and we were getting the scraps from the table.
Brilliant Manager (now we’re getting to it) our ‘brilliant manager’ was looking in the direction of Stockport, no way he was stopping here, why he couldn’t just come out up front instead of the fiasco spoilt it for me.
You daub a rosy picture that never really existed.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 9530
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?


BigDog.
Welcome to the RED ink reply club.
We are honored brother. :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:14 am
Posts: 613
Snowy wrote:
What planet are orbiting around…. Ground was bound to be full after you get promotion for the first month, check the stats……
The team was being slagged by the same people as the ‘left overs’ as all the best players had been snapped up and we were getting the scraps from the table.
Brilliant Manager (now we’re getting to it) our ‘brilliant manager’ was looking in the direction of Stockport, no way he was stopping here, why he couldn’t just come out up front instead of the fiasco spoilt it for me.
You daub a rosy picture that never really existed.


Isn’t one of the hardest parts of being a football club attracting new/floating fans? Yes the ground is likely to be full for the first month but as a club we should’ve been doing everything to retain the extra fans. I think we managed to keep quite a few over last season but have lost roughly 1000 this season. We had a platform to build on and seem to have let that pass us by.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:51 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
Krampesh wrote:
Snowy wrote:
What planet are orbiting around…. Ground was bound to be full after you get promotion for the first month, check the stats……
The team was being slagged by the same people as the ‘left overs’ as all the best players had been snapped up and we were getting the scraps from the table.
Brilliant Manager (now we’re getting to it) our ‘brilliant manager’ was looking in the direction of Stockport, no way he was stopping here, why he couldn’t just come out up front instead of the fiasco spoilt it for me.
You daub a rosy picture that never really existed.


Isn’t one of the hardest parts of being a football club attracting new/floating fans? Yes the ground is likely to be full for the first month but as a club we should’ve been doing everything to retain the extra fans. I think we managed to keep quite a few over last season but have lost roughly 1000 this season. We had a platform to build on and seem to have let that pass us by.

How many have been lost by the new age rules?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?


BigDog.
Welcome to the RED ink reply club.
We are honored brother. :lol: :lol:

Aye, expanding the special class.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
Posts: 1278
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.


What planet are orbiting around…. Ground was bound to be full after you get promotion for the first month, check the stats……
The team was being slagged by the same people as the ‘left overs’ as all the best players had been snapped up and we were getting the scraps from the table.
Brilliant Manager (now we’re getting to it) our ‘brilliant manager’ was looking in the direction of Stockport, no way he was stopping here, why he couldn’t just come out up front instead of the fiasco spoilt it for me.
You daub a rosy picture that never really existed.


What on earth have I just read here. :laugh:

There was nothing to complain about because the football was good and the manager was also very very good at his job. He moved on for a lot more money, get over it. Face the facts - he is better and was better than the current Hartlepool United.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
Posts: 1278
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?


BigDog.
Welcome to the RED ink reply club.
We are honored brother. :lol: :lol:


Rent free - every day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:49 pm
Posts: 1278
Snowy wrote:
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?


BigDog.
Welcome to the RED ink reply club.
We are honored brother. :lol: :lol:

Aye, expanding the special class.



Just going to ignore point 1. Point 2 is me commenting on the football - no football team that has to rebuild every season AND loses its best players year on year is going to be positioned to start a season well.

Are you feeling okay Snowy, you know, up top? After all of your years you keep harping on about I thought you’d know better…..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:14 am
Posts: 613
Snowy wrote:
How many have been lost by the new age rules?

I’m going to say definitely not 1000. While the rule is shit it’s only under 14s so a couple of hundred max I’d say leaving a significant portion not turning up for their own reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:45 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:
Snowy wrote:
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.
Now children, let’s guess who’s fault all this is then…….. who could it be sctatchinghead

We’re in a rot of our own making. Anyone who thinks losing your best players year on year - with 0 continuity to your playing staff - is the recipe for success, is likely deluded.
If only we’d known, you had the answer all the time and kept it to yourself….. if only it was that easy eh?


BigDog.
Welcome to the RED ink reply club.
We are honored brother. :lol: :lol:

Aye, expanding the special class.



Just going to ignore point 1. Point 2 is me commenting on the football - no football team that has to rebuild every season AND loses its best players year on year is going to be positioned to start a season well.

Are you feeling okay Snowy, you know, up top? After all of your years you keep harping on about I thought you’d know better…..

Point 1 difficult eh?

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:
Snowy wrote:
thebigdog wrote:

There was no rot to stop when we were promoted from NL. Ground full, including the executive boxes. Team is a great spot. Brilliant manager.


What planet are orbiting around…. Ground was bound to be full after you get promotion for the first month, check the stats……
The team was being slagged by the same people as the ‘left overs’ as all the best players had been snapped up and we were getting the scraps from the table.
Brilliant Manager (now we’re getting to it) our ‘brilliant manager’ was looking in the direction of Stockport, no way he was stopping here, why he couldn’t just come out up front instead of the fiasco spoilt it for me.
You daub a rosy picture that never really existed.


What on earth have I just read here. :laugh:

There was nothing to complain about because the football was good and the manager was also very very good at his job. He moved on for a lot more money, get over it. Face the facts - he is better and was better than the current Hartlepool United.

Good for you.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 5:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
Krampesh wrote:
Snowy wrote:
How many have been lost by the new age rules?

I’m going to say definitely not 1000. While the rule is shit it’s only under 14s so a couple of hundred max I’d say leaving a significant portion not turning up for their own reasons.

Just wondered, silly rule in my opinion. If I had to rely on my old man to accompany me I’d have had to nick in.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 5:22 pm
Posts: 361
Location: Retford
Quote:
There was nothing to complain about because the football was good and the manager was also very very good at his job. He moved on for a lot more money, get over it. Face the facts - he is better and was better than the current Hartlepool United


Odd to be so attached to a former manager?? He did a good job but left, move on and get behind the current set up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 8:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
Bostonpoolie wrote:
Quote:
There was nothing to complain about because the football was good and the manager was also very very good at his job. He moved on for a lot more money, get over it. Face the facts - he is better and was better than the current Hartlepool United


Odd to be so attached to a former manager?? He did a good job but left, move on and get behind the current set up.

Be nice If they did, but some people keep harking back, it must be ❤️….. :laugh: jn

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:16 pm
Posts: 81
Snowy wrote:
Krampesh wrote:
Snowy wrote:
How many have been lost by the new age rules?

I’m going to say definitely not 1000. While the rule is shit it’s only under 14s so a couple of hundred max I’d say leaving a significant portion not turning up for their own reasons.

Just wondered, silly rule in my opinion. If I had to rely on my old man to accompany me I’d have had to nick in.



Not up to Pools, though. The rule was brought in across all clubs in the country as a result of updating safeguarding children policies after a review by EFL and Barnardos.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 10:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
Not blaming Pools, it’s obviously been thought up by people who probably little better to do, still think it’s a silly rule.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2022 7:15 pm
Posts: 3929
I can freely admit i had no idea how it would go before the season started, but suspected with the scottish signings they would be well above or well below the required standard ,ie Hartley was going to come out of it as genius or madman....the early signs aren't good.
I don't have an inside line to how the club is run but I don't really get the criticism of Singh--the bloke isn't going to put his life savings in (and nor should he) and there are no others I am aware of waiting in the wings.
Hartley knew the budget before he joined and decided to spend it on the likes of Murray and Hastie, and seems to have ok'd some of the others without looking close enough (the more I see of Lacey the less I like him)
There is obviously still time for him to turn it around, and he should be allowed to do so, there were signs (from a very low bar) of improvement in the first half vs Bradford, but the current worry is any team with half a brain who knows how to press us even a little will wipe the floor with us based on the 2nd half display.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 6:09 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:
Snowy wrote:
We are where we are, we’re Pool’s, apart from IOR, it’s been swimming against the tide, beats drowning though.
Even if we got a sugar daddy for life, the ‘Sirens of Doom’ would be wailing about some other aspect such as is the salmon in the sandwiches in the KPG Lounge of the at the new 45,000 seater stadium from natural sources or not..Endless posts on the topic would follow as accusations the new owner is using tinned salmon run riot…he has to go we need a new millionaire chairman.p they chunter :roll:


‘We’re Pools’ - right, so that means we just accept we’re completely shite does it. Yeah, good one mate.

You don’t get it I’m afraid and perhaps you never will.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 6:16 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
thebigdog wrote:

‘We’re Pools’ - right, so that means we just accept we’re completely shite does it. Yeah, good one mate.


Not the point I was making at all, subtlety really is wasted on you sonny.
Your trouble is you can’t read, you scan for key words and react like a badly trained donkey and kick out… braying to daw maximum attention.
If you can’t see the point, it’s because you see what you want to see.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 6:21 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:

Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods.


And some people on here have been saying for years we don’t get decent players her because Raj won’t splash the cash. You can’t have it both ways.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 8:15 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
loyal_fan wrote:
I don't have an inside line to how the club is run but I don't really get the criticism of Singh--the bloke isn't going to put his life savings in (and nor should he) and there are no others I am aware of waiting in the wings.

Some ‘supporters’ believe the sole purpose of an owner is to put endless money into a club, usually those with no money of their own.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 8:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 19729
Krampesh wrote:
Snowy wrote:
How many have been lost by the new age rules?

I’m going to say definitely not 1000. While the rule is shit it’s only under 14s so a couple of hundred max I’d say leaving a significant portion not turning up for their own reasons.

more have been lost simply by the club having a bad end to one season and a bad start to another. anyone got the stats for W L D since the rotherham defeat. think the club are bloody lucky that they are getting what they get through the gates. i,d love to trail up to a home game but there has to be a good reason to do it. more reasons to save my money than to spend it at the moment. like most sensible poolies i do not expect the team to win every game or be in a promotion chase season on season but at the moment things look a bigger farce than the relegation season was.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 9:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 9530
Snowy wrote:
loyal_fan wrote:
I don't have an inside line to how the club is run but I don't really get the criticism of Singh--the bloke isn't going to put his life savings in (and nor should he) and there are no others I am aware of waiting in the wings.

Some ‘supporters’ believe the sole purpose of an owner is to put endless money into a club, usually those with no money of their own.


Not endless money.
Just the unbudgeted incomes from last season to get somewhere near the pitch.
Ye every club has a tad of debt.
We getting left behind by a little club like Barrow.
Its embarrassing but know doubt u will have anutha meltdown /tantrum because in your 112 years of being a poolie 93 years have been shite and all should accept it.
Good news Snowman im having a break of here till Saturday.
Try not to miss me to much.
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:03 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
kevin pooles gloves wrote:

Not endless money.
Stating the obvious Kevin.

Just the unbudgeted incomes from last season to get somewhere near the pitch.
You have access to the accounts Kevin? do quantify that.

Ye every club has a tad of debt.
Define a ‘tad’ Kevin.

We getting left behind by a little club like Barrow.
Most clubs in our Division are as well, your point is Keven?

Its embarrassing but know doubt u will have anutha meltdown /tantrum because in your 112 years of being a poolie 93 years have been shite and all should accept it.
Don’t do melt downs Kevin, just ask awkward questions and watch you meltdown.

Good news Snowman im having a break of here till Saturday.
THE BOARD REJOICES clappp

Try not to miss me to much.
Only if the ammo’s faulty or the sights are out Kevin. :laugh:

:lol:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:06 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:35 pm
Posts: 523
Stats line up something like, W1. L10. D6. League games.

We last won on March 18th (soz) 2022, v Newport. According to soccerbase.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:11 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37436
2021 sctatchinghead

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
a few things worrying me 5 league games in and with the transfer window closing the end of the month....

1.we have started the season with only 3 recognised central defenders and when one is out injured we are forced into completely changing our shape..that's just ridiculous...if the team performs best with 3 at the back and its hartley's preferred set up given we have 2 decent wing backs then one injury shouldn't mean we have to change the formation...we clearly need another decent defender in..
2.flapper is non league imo, but as we are unfortunately lumbered with him yet again for the rest of the season, we need to have a decent keeper to bring in for competition and for when it gets worse and the shit really starts hitting the fan... which with flapper it inevitably will..and whoever we bring in needs to be experienced and capable not a young kid...
3.we have 4 defensive central midfielders and crawford and shelton...no way that mix is going to work out and so something definitely needs to change there....

..am banking on hartley being well aware of the issues despite all the talk being about lack of quality in the final third...the next few days will be interesting..

.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:52 pm
Posts: 4448
Snowy wrote:
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:

Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods.


And some people on here have been saying for years we don’t get decent players her because Raj won’t splash the cash. You can’t have it both ways.


Decent wages compared to what say we might get. Like what is the point of this guy supposedly looking for transfers when we have supposedly a decent manager? What a waste, of a wage, be ok if he brought decent players in, since he has arrived have we had 1? I don't get what the club are trying to do at the minute. Seems as though we are on a collision course with the national league.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:45 pm
Posts: 2002
billyliar.."Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods..."Decent wages compared to what say we might get"

..player leaves......billy not happy...its cos raj wont pay him decent wages hes on more money at shields etc
..player underperforms......billy not happy...but hes getting decent wages and its just not good enough etc

...as i say just not very bright... :character-jestercolor:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 7:36 am
Posts: 38
poolie1 wrote:
billyliar.."Some people at that club are earning decent money and are not producing the goods..."Decent wages compared to what say we might get"

..player leaves......billy not happy...its cos raj wont pay him decent wages hes on more money at shields etc
..player underperforms......billy not happy...but hes getting decent wages and its just not good enough etc

...as i say just not very bright... :character-jestercolor:


Any reason you’re avoiding the question in the HOOC thread or are you still thinking of some bs excuse to be taking 50% of the proceeds away from a charity


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Poor Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 5:52 pm
Posts: 4448
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Snowy wrote:
loyal_fan wrote:
I don't have an inside line to how the club is run but I don't really get the criticism of Singh--the bloke isn't going to put his life savings in (and nor should he) and there are no others I am aware of waiting in the wings.

Some ‘supporters’ believe the sole purpose of an owner is to put endless money into a club, usually those with no money of their own.


Not endless money.
Just the unbudgeted incomes from last season to get somewhere near the pitch.
Ye every club has a tad of debt.
We getting left behind by a little club like Barrow.
Its embarrassing but know doubt u will have anutha meltdown /tantrum because in your 112 years of being a poolie 93 years have been shite and all should accept it.
Good news Snowman im having a break of here till Saturday.
Try not to miss me to much.
:lol:


Hobin and to a lesser extent raj basically tried to con people into buying season tickets. This is not a play off budget anybody with half a footballing brain and watched pools for years can see this. You don't have to know what players are on to see this. Just have to look where you get them from, the leagues they are coming from , the standard of those teams. How many league quality players have we signed this year? Umerah possibly our best player so far came from.the mighty Wealdstone.

Hobins promises of marquee signings, well that's just an embarrassing thing to come out with, seems to talk a good game this guy but does much ever get done, apart from volunteers chipping in. Still not convinced by him.

If they came out and said back the club we are still really struggling to produce what fans want because we haven't got the money, despite having good support, then fans wouldn't be as critical. Don't promise what your not able to deliver.

Raj did a brilliant job getting us back to the football league but all that work is being undone by crazy decisions since.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: BansteadPoolie, Bazil, dykey, elwood, Flying Hogans, itwontwork, Jamie1952, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, JohnO55, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, Mikey76, MutleyRules, Optimistic, Poolie_merv, Sandman, Snowy, Splod, Stomper409, Stotty1908, TheNoose and 242 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.