Good grief, that's a statement I haven't heard much, if ever, in 44 years of watching Pools.



https://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/sport/ ... -1-9738927

Can Richard Mennear read a bank statement?

"With the club in a much healthier and stable financial position."

Aye, it's lost another £1.5m and is totally reliant on Clarence 18 Limited.

That's still healthier and more stable than having Coxall the f**k face in charges.

My favourite part of this is someone thinking we spend £85k a year on cars. And still not knowing what debit means.

Every loss making, privately owned football club is 'totally reliant' on its current owners. Pools were in the same position right through the good times with IOR - as the ultimate gifting of the club to Coxberg made clear.

You after laugh

The most vocal people are always the biggest idiots.

Takes dum to know dum like.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What do they think "debit" means?

Empty vessels make most noise- - yOu, aFTer laUGh!

I think debt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see a new poster called billyayresboots has emerged on the other board having a pop at The Trust again, I wonder who this could be. I have no idea. It’s a complete mystery shortly after Mr Blue stopped posting. I doubt those two are linked, I mean he told everyone he was flouncing off the scene.

It’s tremendous that even after the chairman asked them to stop it the shit continues. Buffoons. How many usernames across various forums do this lot have?

Never in the field of human posting has a spell and grammar checker been needed to correct so many posts by so few.

Online equivalent of wearing a groucho disguise.

I think you'll find that person was given the board address at barrow and it is pure coincidence that a new account appeared, which also hated the trust and had the same grammatical errors as the recently retired accounts.

I love the fake accounts if im honest, i liked the african based one, and i loved hat cam, its probably my favourite ever thing thats ever happened on the internet.

Maybe Poolie fan unity isn't best served by cherry picking comments that appear on someone else's board to mock? His swipe at the Trust has not gone unchallenged there.
And the Trust is pretty good at defending its own actions.

Maybe it isn’t but it’s there for people to read whether I comment on it or not. Plus the tone was set in thread long before my post. Everyone knows what was being talked about.

Do you not agree that it’s comical? Does he think he’s pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes? A blind man on a galloping horse could identify him within one sentence. I’m with Yupeb, it’s funny. I think these few people are beyond fan unity and deserve to have the piss taken out of them.

https://www.hufcsupporterstrust.org.uk/ ... 18-account…

Nothing wrong with that, they can't touch you for it. I hear Yubep's with Yupeb too.

I'm not that interested in people with multiple online identities, at least not since Colonel Dibble left the Bunker (except of course that he hasn't). Don't give a monkeys about Billy Ayre's Moustache or whatever he's calling himself today and as I said, it's far from the case that everyone 'over there' is an anti-Trust obsessive.

Are we really at the "yeah but he started it" stage?

I'd be embarrassed if my 7 year old came out with that kind of bollocks.

Thanks for the link Mr. Butt. It's a fair and supportive response that no fan should have an issue with. Not that pointing out that "Conjecture serves no purpose and can be damaging" is going to make any difference at all to the amount of conjecturing that goes on.

He did he invaded Poland.

I didn’t say that to be fair, I just agreed with someone saying it’s funny. I even suggested Mr Dawes is probably right and I never said it’s any more than a handful of people on the other board either because it isn’t more than a few at most of the usual suspects. The effort to register a new user and then for it to be blindingly obvious after one sentence is comical though.

I think people are making an issue where there isn't one.

Raj has pumped a load of money in as he has said a number of times.
Blakeledge has made a substantial loss but still wants to recoup some of it. We knew that 18 months ago.
RS's financial input is structured as an investment. So what? that's exactly what it is and he is protecting it.

Theres nothing in the accounts or the statement that should either worry or surprise anyone with an ounce of financial knowledge.

Spot on Mr I.

Fully agree with you Mr. I and you afTer, laUGh""

I agree with you - Raj has pumped in cash, JB has lost but wants something back, the club continues to hemorrhage cash - but can't see who is 'making an issue where there isn't one'. HUST seem to be pretty much on the button - fairly. What am I missing?