Bluestreak wrote:Whats this Brexit thing.....have i missed something.....is it a type of bee?
Montpoolier wrote:Some Conservative party bigwig whose name I didn't even bother to read recently came out with a statement like "A long delay to Brexit is unthinkable; it could mean the death of the Conservative party."
Wow, that sounds like a national disaster of epic proportions. I can understand Joe Public's despair at the prospect.
PJPoolie wrote:
Cadged off the social media;
“Another stupid BBC vox pop with one of those elderly Brexit voters, completely detached from reality, whose only argument is 'Why can't they just get on with it?' Oh wait, it was the Prime Minister ...”
derwent wrote:She has done a magnificent job for those who voted remain, as has Parliament.
There must be a top choreographer involved.
They have sickened the leave voters to the point of despair and, now that the brexiteers have been worn down, they hope to achieve a people's vote which will finally vindicate their delaying tactics, causing us to remain in Europe.
Then if staying in the EU proves to be a disaster the politicians will blame the people's vote and if remaining is a success, the same politicians will take the credit.
Right from the start we have been played for puppets.
Will the EU welcome us back with open arms? They might but I reckon there will be a price to pay and it's ordinary folk that will pay it.
Valiant wrote:She had a majority in Parliament and called a General Election when none was needed. Whose fault was it that she lost her majority ? Hers.
General Election was resounding rejection of her way of doing things so she should have realised there and then she needed to change tack Instead of reaching out to sympathetic Labour MP's she ignored them . She also made the decision not to make any preparation for No Deal.
Now attacking the very MP's she needs to support her deal. Absolutely clueless and unwilling to consider any opinion other than her own. Don't forget this is the woman who at her time at the Home Office slashed the number of bobbies on the beat but now denies it has had any impact on the rise of Knife crime despite very senior police officer at the Met saying it has !
derwent wrote:The big question, Mr Valiant is why did she follow the course of decision making which you describe.
Think about it.
derwent wrote:Well I can't believe that May has subjected herself to all the abuse and ridicule and everything else she has put herself through, without a good and calculated reason.
She's already lost two humiliating votes and just when there seems a glimmer of hope for her deal, she is winding the MPs up again.
There has got to be an ulterior motive, just got to be.
Nobody in their right mind behaves like that as the norm.
Leaving without a deal is and always has been a real outcome but there is a sting in this tail. All the plotting, planning, posturing and brinkmanship is continuing in the corridors of power and is increasing in tensity and it will continue to increase until whatever they have all agreed behind the scenes is enacted.
Deals are only rubber stamped around negotiating tables, they are negotiated in the corridors and back rooms. Smoke filled rooms as they used to be called.
I can only see losers at this moment in time, with us ordinary folk right at the top of the pile.
poolieinnottingham wrote:The best way forward I think is to cancel article 50 now to avoid any chew, then book in another referendum for 6 months time or however long is statutorily needed.
Some people want May's deal, some want no deal, and some want to remain.
Therefore all three options should be on the paper. Then we would see exactly what the people want.
Pooliekel wrote:The starting point was no deal
PJPoolie wrote:
Deals weren’t even mentioned, leaving the EU without any sort of trade deal certainly wasn’t. If it was it would have harmed the leave campaign as all of the economic forecasts point at a shrinking economy and who would actually vote for that? The leave campaign stuck with wild speculations and outright lies that suited several different layers of self interest.
If that was a starting point the result would have been different.
yloop wrote:We are we're we are... I'm just gonna get the popcorn out and live my best life.
poolieinnottingham wrote:The best way forward I think is to cancel article 50 now to avoid any chew, then book in another referendum for 6 months time or however long is statutorily needed.
Some people want May's deal, some want no deal, and some want to remain.
Therefore all three options should be on the paper. Then we would see exactly what the people want.
yloop wrote:We are we're we are... I'm just gonna get the popcorn out and live my best life.
Pooliekel wrote:
It's been a complete waste of time trying to get 27 countries, no scrub that , France and Germany to give us anything at all.
yloop wrote:It's ok, Nigel Farage is walking to London, that will sort it all out.
PJPoolie wrote:Someone pointed out that Prime Ministers Twitter account has 5.4 million followers, that ‘speech’ had 444 likes!!
I’m surprised it was so many.
This is surely the worst government and opposition in history?
Loid Blackwell wrote:
Farage and Batten must be laughing all the way PJ ??
Loid Blackwell wrote:He did his bit for the country a few years ago Talbot ,nothing more..
Montpoolier wrote:"May said the Government would vote against the indicative votes amendments as she believed they would set an "unwelcome precedent" where Parliament could overrule the government."
Excuse me but could someone explain to me what is the fucking point of parliament in that case?
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: frankie1951, kevin pooles gloves, MutleyRules, Snowy, swedpool5157 and 664 guests