Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Loughlin
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:12 pm
Posts: 1015
Have you seen the shite he putting up on twittter tonight. The fella is so arrogant it's untrue, gladly he doesn't read the bunker so I can say what a prick the guy is!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
Seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 300
I always thought he came across alright, he's just a fan trying to make a living by being "cosy" with the club at the end of the day. But he's really starting to piss me off as well now, should have cut his losses after the Donnelly front page shocker yesterday.

Sure he'll show a bit more investigative nous if the Trust get a place on the board. I for one cant wait for those "exclusives"... Although, *coughs* i'd be surprised if he could do more probing than he did to Gary Coxall bbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
What's been said I've just had a look and don't see anything worth get excited about apart from him sticking up for Roy Kelly a bit. That's fair enough in my eyes, I thought it was terrible misguided article and Tweeted him directly to say why I think it was but it would be a boring World if we all agreed. Is that it or have I missed something?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 300
Aye, there's nowt overly newsworthy there, think it's mainly the fact he's still accusing people of having an 'agenda' against Coxall. No real argument as far I can see it. He needs to get over the fact people's assumptions about his lovely lovely person of a mate were proven right though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
Is he?

Where?

He's spoke out against the owner to be fair, more than the Mail has to date. It might have taken a while but he has.

I'm not sure what calling each other pricks is going to achieve in this position, I would challenge any of you to not respond to people you probably don't even know calling you names on the Internet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 300
Just in a reply to some people who I assume are off here mate. Was his last tweet when I looked. Like I say, nowt major there, he's been getting some stick for a while, deserved and undeserved at times like you say, but he hasn't helped himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
His bit about Donnelly was very 'keyboard warriorish'

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:26 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:32 pm
Posts: 2628
Location: Walking round the houses
I liked Carson's reply :laugh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
It's probably all going round in circles bit now n doesn't really show anyone in a good light chewing on twitter (me included)

In a very last attempt to defend this place n the 'detectives'

The people who uncovered Gary's actions didn't have an agenda against him since day one. He was welcomed at the trusts launch night, spoke on the stage well and actually made us believe our future looked good.

It was only until the first loan with access finance and the winding up petitions that people started to dig into him.

Shame that it's went this way, I wish Gary had made a success of it all me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37661
PJPoolie wrote:
Is he?

Where?

He's spoke out against the owner to be fair, more than the Mail has to date. It might have taken a while but he has.

.
Taken a while......? :laugh: To compare him to the Mail is pointless, he's also spoken out more against the owner than 'Freelance Castration Monthly' and 'Radiator Review', who come to think of it probably have more of an opinion about our owner than the two of them put together.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 10:05 am 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
I have this vision of him being around in America in the 60s slagging off Woodward and Bernstein for being marry detectives.

He appears to be still under some illusion that this place is anti huff and he can't just accept that he got something badly wrong and move on.

Nobody wants to keep attaching him but he appears to cast the first stone on every occasion.

He got coxall so wrong but nobody would hold that against him if he just appeared to be sitting on the right side of the fence.

It seems like he just can't admit to himself that he was wrong.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
I would like to think this is the start of a new era, a clean slate, with us descending no further, but why do I get the feeling this is just the beginning of possibly the end, and there is further heartache to come before we start on the long road back to normality?.

All this in-fighting , squabbling and bitching, its self destructive and will eventually kill the club.

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:10 pm
Posts: 463
Opinions are fine. We all have them and there will be lots of differences. It's the personal agenda some people seem to be on, to attack anyone who has a different opinion to them and picking up on anything they can find to beat them with.
As horden says it is self destructive and we ALL need to be bigger than that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
horden wrote:
I would like to think this is the start of a new era, a clean slate, with us descending no further, but why do I get the feeling this is just the beginning of possibly the end, and there is further heartache to come before we start on the long road back to normality?.

All this in-fighting , squabbling and bitching, its self destructive and will eventually kill the club.


This.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
:clap:
horden wrote:
I would like to think this is the start of a new era, a clean slate, with us descending no further, but why do I get the feeling this is just the beginning of possibly the end, and there is further heartache to come before we start on the long road back to normality?.

All this in-fighting , squabbling and bitching, its self destructive and will eventually kill the club.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
Everyone needs to get over themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:55 pm
Posts: 1278
Location: back home
I can't see anything wrong with Loughlin's twitter. I agree, think it's time everyone wound their necks in a bit and just move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 6028
Loughlin was duped by Coxall as were we all for a period. He may have said things he regrets but haven't we all.
Time to let bygones be bygones and concentrate on what the clubs needs? Unity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:32 pm
Posts: 6011
Chip over 600 people have stumped up now to agree with you. Those who think they know better are obviously I'll informed.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

_________________
All participation is optional and you'll not have an AK pushed down your throat if you're not in uniform


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:54 pm
Posts: 187
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Posts: 2361
Location: The Town End
TCN wrote:
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?


Because they think that the people who set the trust up have an agenda to control the club, pathetic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
TCN wrote:
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?



I dont know if they will admit it but im 99% certain the hostility and abuse secretly makes them even more determined to get it to work.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 6:00 pm
Posts: 53
TCN wrote:
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?


It makes no sense to me either. I'm wondering if other supporters trusts have come up against the same thing?
It could just be that some individuals don't like the fact that they didn't come up with the idea themselves.

People in general just don't make sense a lot of the time. I think the best thing anyone can do is do what feels right for you, join the trust or not, buy a season ticket or not and try to rise above any of the other stuff. Not that easy I know and articles like the one in question which are misinformed at best or just blatantly wrong don't help, especially with emotions understandably running high at the moment.

For what it's worth, I have every faith that the Trust are moving things forward in a very professional way and I appreciate everything those involved are doing. As I'm sure do the other 600 plus members.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:48 pm
Posts: 1852
TCN wrote:
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?

Because they're being a bit thick.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:46 pm
Posts: 18
I'm sure I've read from other trusts, that the main enemy towards a trust is some of the fans the trust wants to give the club back to.

Maybe this includes guano journalists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:57 pm
Posts: 9540
Location: Wynyard Golf Club
There's always going to be those who will say and do the complete opposite but they can just crack on moaning and doing their own thing. The trust is growing in numbers by the week which is fantastic to see, however I have the feeling the bigger it grows the more the opposites become annoyed.

_________________
Arguing with idiots is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon, it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board and flies back to its flock to claim victory.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Homer wrote:
so its opposite land


Image

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:10 pm
Posts: 463
thetownendfaithful wrote:
TCN wrote:
Perhaps I'm being a bit thick, but why on earth would there be hostility and abuse directed towards a group of people who's interest lies in the protection and future of our club?


Because they think that the people who set the trust up have an agenda to control the club, pathetic.


Think this sums it up in one sentence.
And they don't seem to want to be convinced otherwise, so it is time to let them get on with it. banghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
I'd take the trust board controlling the club over the current owners.

Disclaimer - this is my opinion. I am a member of the trust but my opinion is my own and does represent the trust, every member and does not mean the trust are trying to take over the club.

Ps screw Flanders


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
I'm a member of Dogs Trust. any views I make on here also shouldn't be classed as representing Dogs Trust.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 5:29 pm 
You don't even have a dog.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 5:43 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 2005
Location: Darlo
Chip Fireball wrote:
I agree Geoff, its just difficult when people keep having a dig day after day, week after week.

There were people ( who are not members of the Trust ) having pop at Phil Dunn for doing an interview on Look North the other night as a spokesperson for the Trust. Why is it him they ask and not The Chairman, suggesting Phil is getting too big for his boots and trying to take over.

The simple truth of the matter- Ronnie is on holiday this week and asked Phil if he could do it. Phil has gone and done something a lot of us wouldn't have the balls to do, in his own spare time, to promote the Trust, and has got stick for it.

By and large we do ignore it, but unfortunately there are about 6 people, who will not let it go and keep on making these attacks. Its absolutely crackers because the likes of Phil and Ronnie are diehard fans.


Phil always comes across well anyway, a proper fan with his head screwed on. An ideal spokesperson in my opinion.
Mind you some people would whinge no matter who was put in front of the cameras or on the radio.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 5:44 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 2005
Location: Darlo
Oh and as for Loughlin, the bell end even blocked comments on all Pools articles on the Echo website. Scared of a few comments the shitehawk.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: East Durham Riviera
loan_star wrote:
Oh and as for Loughlin, the bell end even blocked comments on all Pools articles on the Echo website. Scared of a few comments the shitehawk.



Don't hold back loan star, don't beat about the bush, tell him what you really think of him :laugh:

_________________
Social Media - giving idiots a voice since 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
horden wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Oh and as for Loughlin, the bell end even blocked comments on all Pools articles on the Echo website. Scared of a few comments the shitehawk.



Don't hold back loan star, don't beat about the bush, tell him what you really think of him :laugh:


He doesn't read the place. It's fine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
But like everyone else who doesn't read...

They'll know what's on here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 6:00 pm
Posts: 53
Chip Fireball wrote:
I agree Geoff, its just difficult when people keep having a dig day after day, week after week.

There were people ( who are not members of the Trust ) having pop at Phil Dunn for doing an interview on Look North the other night as a spokesperson for the Trust. Why is it him they ask and not The Chairman, suggesting Phil is getting too big for his boots and trying to take over.

The simple truth of the matter- Ronnie is on holiday this week and asked Phil if he could do it. Phil has gone and done something a lot of us wouldn't have the balls to do, in his own spare time, to promote the Trust, and has got stick for it.

By and large we do ignore it, but unfortunately there are about 6 people, who will not let it go and keep on making these attacks. Its absolutely crackers because the likes of Phil and Ronnie are diehard fans.


It's crazy. Why would everyone be working so hard for the Trust if they weren't diehard fans wanting what's best for the club? It must be hard when it feels like you're under attack, on a personal level too.

It feels a bit to me, from what I've read, like some people want to make it into some sort of competition as to who are the biggest fans? When there are far more worrying things to think about like where has all the money gone, where any future money will go, how the hell we get back into the EFL, how to get rid of the main shareholder and the list goes on and on. It doesn't matter who's the biggest fan when there's no club left....

What a sad state of affairs.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 7:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 4:07 pm
Posts: 1065
Jan_Ove wrote:
Chip Fireball wrote:
I agree Geoff, its just difficult when people keep having a dig day after day, week after week.

There were people ( who are not members of the Trust ) having pop at Phil Dunn for doing an interview on Look North the other night as a spokesperson for the Trust. Why is it him they ask and not The Chairman, suggesting Phil is getting too big for his boots and trying to take over.

The simple truth of the matter- Ronnie is on holiday this week and asked Phil if he could do it. Phil has gone and done something a lot of us wouldn't have the balls to do, in his own spare time, to promote the Trust, and has got stick for it.

By and large we do ignore it, but unfortunately there are about 6 people, who will not let it go and keep on making these attacks. Its absolutely crackers because the likes of Phil and Ronnie are diehard fans.


It's crazy. Why would everyone be working so hard for the Trust if they weren't diehard fans wanting what's best for the club? It must be hard when it feels like you're under attack, on a personal level too.

It feels a bit to me, from what I've read, like some people want to make it into some sort of competition as to who are the biggest fans? When there are far more worrying things to think about like where has all the money gone, where any future money will go, how the hell we get back into the EFL, how to get rid of the main shareholder and the list goes on and on. It doesn't matter who's the biggest fan when there's no club left....

What a sad state of affairs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I agree


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 10:13 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 2005
Location: Darlo
horden wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Oh and as for Loughlin, the bell end even blocked comments on all Pools articles on the Echo website. Scared of a few comments the shitehawk.



Don't hold back loan star, don't beat about the bush, tell him what you really think of him :laugh:


:dance:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2017 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:43 pm
Posts: 70
Jan_Ove wrote:
Chip Fireball wrote:
I agree Geoff, its just difficult when people keep having a dig day after day, week after week.

There were people ( who are not members of the Trust ) having pop at Phil Dunn for doing an interview on Look North the other night as a spokesperson for the Trust. Why is it him they ask and not The Chairman, suggesting Phil is getting too big for his boots and trying to take over.

The simple truth of the matter- Ronnie is on holiday this week and asked Phil if he could do it. Phil has gone and done something a lot of us wouldn't have the balls to do, in his own spare time, to promote the Trust, and has got stick for it.

By and large we do ignore it, but unfortunately there are about 6 people, who will not let it go and keep on making these attacks. Its absolutely crackers because the likes of Phil and Ronnie are diehard fans.


It's crazy. Why would everyone be working so hard for the Trust if they weren't diehard fans wanting what's best for the club? It must be hard when it feels like you're under attack, on a personal level too.

It feels a bit to me, from what I've read, like some people want to make it into some sort of competition as to who are the biggest fans? When there are far more worrying things to think about like where has all the money gone, where any future money will go, how the hell we get back into the EFL, how to get rid of the main shareholder and the list goes on and on. It doesn't matter who's the biggest fan when there's no club left....

What a sad state of affairs.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Being involved with a Supporters Trust always attracts those who want to spoil, criticise, undermine and troll their efforts for whatever reason . . . jealousy, mistrust, opposition, etc. It's important to have clear and transparent goals which fans can support, especially financially. If they trust you with their money then you're doing something right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37661
There are just some people who think that fans running a cub is like a dog walking on its back legs, can be done, but just not natural. :roll:
The same people orgasmically embrace any silver tongued gobshite who labels themself a 'businessman'. They like the idea of the club being run by someone who 'knows what they're doing' and offers them a 'vision'. They know their place.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Loughlin
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2017 7:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 6:00 pm
Posts: 53
QuakerPete wrote:
Jan_Ove wrote:
Chip Fireball wrote:
I agree Geoff, its just difficult when people keep having a dig day after day, week after week.

There were people ( who are not members of the Trust ) having pop at Phil Dunn for doing an interview on Look North the other night as a spokesperson for the Trust. Why is it him they ask and not The Chairman, suggesting Phil is getting too big for his boots and trying to take over.

The simple truth of the matter- Ronnie is on holiday this week and asked Phil if he could do it. Phil has gone and done something a lot of us wouldn't have the balls to do, in his own spare time, to promote the Trust, and has got stick for it.

By and large we do ignore it, but unfortunately there are about 6 people, who will not let it go and keep on making these attacks. Its absolutely crackers because the likes of Phil and Ronnie are diehard fans.


It's crazy. Why would everyone be working so hard for the Trust if they weren't diehard fans wanting what's best for the club? It must be hard when it feels like you're under attack, on a personal level too.

It feels a bit to me, from what I've read, like some people want to make it into some sort of competition as to who are the biggest fans? When there are far more worrying things to think about like where has all the money gone, where any future money will go, how the hell we get back into the EFL, how to get rid of the main shareholder and the list goes on and on. It doesn't matter who's the biggest fan when there's no club left....

What a sad state of affairs.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Being involved with a Supporters Trust always attracts those who want to spoil, criticise, undermine and genius their efforts for whatever reason . . . jealousy, mistrust, opposition, etc. It's important to have clear and transparent goals which fans can support, especially financially. If they trust you with their money then you're doing something right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, you're never going to please everyone all of the time. I just think, if you don't want to be involved then just get on and do your own thing and don't abuse those who do. And yes, nearly 700 people have trusted the Trust with their money and that says more than a handful of doubters trying to stir things up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Essex poolie, Flying Hogans, Freaky Teeth, Infidel, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, Kallang Poolie, loan_star, Mctee1908, Ozzy Saltburn, pollyo, PTID, Robbie10, stevven, Stomper409, Sussex UK, UKP and 370 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.