Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:46 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
Remind me of the ownership of Newport County will you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:28 pm 
Would that be the same as the o's?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:32 pm
Posts: 6011
How many teams have a Supporters Trust with an active Member on their Board MrI? ..

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

_________________
All participation is optional and you'll not have an AK pushed down your throat if you're not in uniform


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
I'd have to look like it up but the number Ian definitely on the increase.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:39 pm 
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Remind me of the ownership of Newport County will you?


Was it their trust or that 89th minute goal that saves an equally struggling club?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:08 pm
Posts: 140
Playdoh wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Remind me of the ownership of Newport County will you?


Was it their trust or that 89th minute goal that saves an equally struggling club?


Both, considering that the goalscorer was one of the many January signings they made.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:37 am
Posts: 269
Playdoh wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Remind me of the ownership of Newport County will you?


Was it their trust or that 89th minute goal that saves an equally struggling club?


I think you've missed the point mate.

The fact that there ownership brought in a number of signings in January to strengthen and make an actual effort to stay up. As opposed to ours that sold anyone they could replaced them with kids in positions we didn't need and tried to flog pint glasses on ebay.

At no point this season as far as i am aware have Newport been wound up. We have been 3 times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:51 pm 
Don't think we were wound up,they were paid. At least I hope they have been.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:52 pm 
Chip Fireball wrote:
Playdoh wrote:
Would that be the same as the o's?


If you are talking about Orient they are owned by Francesco Bechetti.

Like Coxall, a Chairman who decided the January transfer window was a good time to offload any players he could get a transfer fee for, on the basis he had kids he couple play in the first team.

The two teams that didn't strengthen their squads, both got relegated.


Has the LOFT been running club in his absence?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 6028
For every Newport there's a York City.

But for every fan owned club there's another club owned by a crook stealing money from the game. Success is temporary, the town should always have its own club whatever it's level.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Playdoh wrote:
Don't think we were wound up,they were paid. At least I hope they have been.


Yes with massive cunting loans!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:03 pm 
Yubep wrote:
Playdoh wrote:
Don't think we were wound up,they were paid. At least I hope they have been.


Yes with massive cunting loans!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That would have to be paid off along with GC shares and Pam ,this finance guy and all. Along with the deposit needed for the National league.

The shopping list is massive and a very large start off point for any new owners. Whoever takes over needs a wedge for working capital as this list seems endless.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:13 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 2005
Location: Darlo
Sounds like Coxall is waiting for his pot of gold. Difficult times for you lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
Frankly, administration wouldn't be the worst option. As Mr Loid says, we do have the ground as a foundation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 7:47 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
only a fool would prefer admin to giving pam and billy bullshitter their money.

Much better they steal it, than go into admin.

At least someone would make money other than administrators.

infact I am going to give Pam my bank details and give her 50% of my wages in a direct debit.

In Pam/Sage/JPNG/FDE/B.Bullshitter we trust.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm
Posts: 1439
Administration could be a disaster now that we've gone down. Starting in the conference with a points deduction would make bouncing straight back much harder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:08 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
If the club is losing money, or appears to be, maybe someone should approach Gary and suggest he owes the club have the debt.

Or we get plod to open the books and lets see how much he has really taken out.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:06 pm
Posts: 1072
I'm just baffled still how these snakes passed the FA fit and worthy owner tests. Can we not sue the FA?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 1057
alibarthez wrote:
I'm just baffled still how these snakes passed the FA fit and worthy owner tests. Can we not sue the FA?


How many clubs are or have been in the shit because of their owners? Even clubs at the top end have had unscrupulous owners. I agree it's time the FA admitted the fit and proper persons test is a joke and changed things.

Listening to the radio earlier, ian wright suggested the idea of an annual bond paid by the owners for the following season to ensure wages are paid etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 308
Yes would be a good idea..I think the fa don't give a stuff for the likes of pools as long as premier league clubs are alright that's all they care about. Money in the premier league makes me sick


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: For those who say that Trust ownership can't work
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 1057
I'd agree but then they've let Portsmouth, Leeds, Blackburn and a fair few others fail.

I think reform is needed. A club should be operating in the black and should have the funds for all aspects of the new season placed in a holding account and paid accordingly.

If the club's operating costs per year account are £1 miliion, then that should be put into a holding account before the season starts. At least that ensures staff, players and the tax man get paid on time. . And stops scheisters bleeding clubs dry - to an extent.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: dykey, Essex poolie, Flying Hogans, Freaky Teeth, Graham Robson, Infidel, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, loan_star, Mctee1908, Ozzy Saltburn, pollyo, poolie1966, Poolie27, PTID, RichyHpool, Robbie10, Splod, Stomper409, Sussex UK, UKP, Warwick Hunt and 359 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.