Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 7:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Like you pointed out last night Chris. What is worse... what's happening at the club or those blindly still supporting him?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:26 pm
Posts: 1013
Wow that is pretty scary to read back even from such a relatively short vantage point in the future. Seems like January has come and gone, there is no tangible evidence any real talks are underway in relation to the ground or any project and here was no mention of anything like this in the Q&A session where questions were vetted and time was wasted on arse licking bullshitting questions about nothing issues. People who tried to ask difficult questions were either patronized or the question was ignored and deemed 'insulting'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 2411
That has been denied on several occasions.

_________________
http://i11.tinypic.com/2vwcmeb.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
We were told by one pools fans, who had inside info, that we were getting a Jnauary announcement that would have our minds blown.

I have been waiting to be mind blown now for about 6 weeks.

Maybe that Pools fan could give us an update?

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
The Colonel wrote:
We were told by one pools fans, who had inside info, that we were getting a Jnauary announcement that would have our minds blown.

I have been waiting to be mind blown now for about 6 weeks.

Maybe that Pools fan could give us an update?

Maybe you should let it go. As a supposed pools fan and Trust promoter, shouldn't you/we be attempting to unite the fan base, not continue the shite?

Every member of the Trust has the moral obligation to try and unite the fans for what's looking like one of our biggest tests yet.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
misterb2001 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
We were told by one pools fans, who had inside info, that we were getting a Jnauary announcement that would have our minds blown.

I have been waiting to be mind blown now for about 6 weeks.

Maybe that Pools fan could give us an update?

Maybe you should let it go. As a supposed pools fan and Trust promoter, shouldn't you/we be attempting to unite the fan base, not continue the shite?

Every member of the Trust has the moral obligation to try and unite the fans for what's looking like one of our biggest tests yet.


Oh please behave. Its not my job to unite any fooker. Neither am I in the trust. Yet.

But lets give you the benefit of the doubt here, how do you propose "WE" unite the fans? And what fans need uniting?

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 2006
Location: Darlo
pooliecrab wrote:
Kind of contradicting yourself there Mr I. While they may not be cut from the same cloth, the end result could mean the same for Pools.
As you say Coxall brought in Sage, what reason do they have for wanting the club to stay alive? They have money invested but is that purely a loan against the clubs assets at no risk to themselves? Like I've mentioned previously, if the club goes bust what option do the council have but to sell the ground? While I support the Trust, getting together the funds to make a rival bid for the stadium is a huge ask.

Needless to say I've as much trust for Coxall as I do Goldberg. Not sure why recent events has changed anyone's opinions.


This all sounds like Reynolds and Darlo without the 25000 seater white elephant.
Reynolds borrows off Sterling to pay debts, cant pay Sterling, club into administration etc etc.
The fact that Sterling got the ground when they took over the club was the only saving grace as this was an asset believe it or not.
When Singh put us in administration we didnt own the ground (thanks to Houghton putting it in a different company) so had no real assets, hence lack of a proper takeover.
Whilst I'm not saying you are going into administration, the whole scenario is similar.
I'm glad all this sort of stuff is now in our hands rather than relying on some bloke who talks the talk but delivers nothing other than trouble.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:48 pm
Posts: 324
http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/ha ... -1-8386933

Can anyone tell me what JPNG Limited actually do? Apart from being the owners of HUFC.
What is their source of income? Anyone got a link to any accounts they may have filed away?
What does Coxhall do? What is his role? I would like to know what work he actually does?

I would like this lot bought out, the sooner the better!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
The Colonel wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
We were told by one pools fans, who had inside info, that we were getting a Jnauary announcement that would have our minds blown.

I have been waiting to be mind blown now for about 6 weeks.

Maybe that Pools fan could give us an update?

Maybe you should let it go. As a supposed pools fan and Trust promoter, shouldn't you/we be attempting to unite the fan base, not continue the shite?

Every member of the Trust has the moral obligation to try and unite the fans for what's looking like one of our biggest tests yet.


Oh please behave. Its not my job to unite any fooker. Neither am I in the trust. Yet.

But lets give you the benefit of the doubt here, how do you propose "WE" unite the fans? And what fans need uniting?

Easiest way is to stop being a bell end constantly trying to wind people up. Almost impossible for you I would imagine like.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:50 pm
Posts: 120
Not that I'm a Martin Samuels fan but there is a good piece about Leyton Orient he has written that has a resonance.
Third item down I think.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... g-MPs.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:59 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
misterb2001 wrote:
Easiest way is to stop being a bell end constantly trying to wind people up. Almost impossible for you I would imagine like.


and there you go, resorting to personal insults yet again. :naughty:

Tell you what. Just for a change, give us all your opinion on whats going on at Pools. And try to be honest about it. Go on, say something interesting. :laugh:

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:03 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
Oh and whilst I am on, Pools fans should be applauding the Detectives, and be forever in their debt. Chipfireball, MrI. ECG, and the others will be regarded as the ones that saved Pools in years to come.

Unlike those others that are still treating them like they are the anti-christ.

Thoughts on that Mr B?

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 2411
Totally agree Colonel

_________________
http://i11.tinypic.com/2vwcmeb.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
well hopefully,we can all take great comfort after Fridays meeting.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
The Colonel wrote:
Oh and whilst I am on, Pools fans should be applauding the Detectives, and be forever in their debt. Chipfireball, MrI. ECG, and the others will be regarded as the ones that saved Pools in years to come.

Unlike those others that are still treating them like they are the anti-christ.

Thoughts on that Mr B?



Finding this stuff out is good, we need to know the truth. We also need to not scoff at those who choose not to believe. Your problem is you feel the need to be part of a group and then hammer anyone who doesn't have the same opinion.

The trust needs all the members it can, those who want the best for it should ensure that it gets as many signed up as humanly possible.

If you truly wanted the best for it then why would you constantly stir up animosity?

The ones that will 'save Pools' are those that will do their utmost best to increase numbers of the Trust membership, even if that means holding their tongue on occasion.

Mr Monkeybutt, for example, at the very least has put himself forward to try and help the cause, even though I do believe he does as much harm as good on occasion.

I've done fuck all apart from joining the Trust (only last week) and try to get people to stop with the pathetic rivalry. It hasn't worked, but at least I've tried.

What have you done?

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:46 pm
Posts: 18
What have you done?

He along with many others, have seen through the bull guano.

At least it looks like you're taking you're rose tinted specs off


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:13 pm 
misterb2001 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Oh and whilst I am on, Pools fans should be applauding the Detectives, and be forever in their debt. Chipfireball, MrI. ECG, and the others will be regarded as the ones that saved Pools in years to come.

Unlike those others that are still treating them like they are the anti-christ.

Thoughts on that Mr B?



Finding this stuff out is good, we need to know the truth. We also need to not scoff at those who choose not to believe. Your problem is you feel the need to be part of a group and then hammer anyone who doesn't have the same opinion.

The trust needs all the members it can, those who want the best for it should ensure that it gets as many signed up as humanly possible.

If you truly wanted the best for it then why would you constantly stir up animosity?

The ones that will 'save Pools' are those that will do their utmost best to increase numbers of the Trust membership, even if that means holding their tongue on occasion.

Mr Monkeybutt, for example, at the very least has put himself forward to try and help the cause, even though I do believe he does as much harm as good on occasion.

I've done fuck all apart from joining the Trust (only last week) and try to get people to stop with the pathetic rivalry. It hasn't worked, but at least I've tried.

What have you done?


I have bit my lip for over a week now, did you notice?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Yes I did Mr Butt. Keep up the good work :wink:

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:21 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
misterb2001 wrote:

If you truly wanted the best for it then why would you constantly stir up animosity?



Right. Show me this constant animosity.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Oo-Did-Dat wrote:
What have you done?

He along with many others, have seen through the bull guano.

At least it looks like you're taking you're rose tinted specs off

No rose tinted specs here, I've been worried since the first WUP. Haven't quite jumped to as many conclusions as some but certainly haven't been in the GC can do no wrong camp.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:38 pm 
misterb2001 wrote:
Yes I did Mr Butt. Keep up the good work :wink:


I went to see a Rarf counsellor and came away partly derarfed, there is an inclination now and again to revert to type but the medication is helping :shifty:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 1057
Is it time we continued to put pressure on coxall and so called journalists to find out the truth? Some may see it as unhelpful, but sitting waiting for the club to potentially go to the wall is a day wasted?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:32 pm
Posts: 1573
It really is poo your pants stuff. Really depressing. After IOR Coxall came in to the club saying all the right things and then paying for travel to away games when we did fuck all business in January......but here we are seemingly on the brink of something very seriously shit.

Can't see what we can do other than trust in the Trust. They are the only ones genuinely interested in the club and nothing more.

Coxall will no more tell us the truth than Theresa May.

I think it's fucking ludicrous that owners of football clubs can get away with what they do. There should be separate rules governing football clubs as they are of massive local interest and importance and if owners do not or are incapable of running it there should be some form of safety net/enforced sale (I appreciate you would need a buyer). Not that this will ever happen because the world is run by money and greed.

At the VERY least the fit and proper test should fucking work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:03 pm 
New thread on facebook stating the Mail can`t even get the date right, JPNG was liquidated in Feb 2016, I can`t be arsed to put him right as a member of the trust, CHEW is inevitable, somebody please inform the poor soul it was incorporated on that date.

He is a loyalist and I admire his blind devotion but come on banghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22671
As important (probably more so) as joining the Trust is getting involved. I was one of a few that did the work in getting the thing started and I believe that it will end up as one of the few achievements of my otherwise pointless existance.

Others have got on board and are doing good works behind the scenes. You too can do likewise.

The answer to the seemingly often asked question 'but what can we do?' is simply that. Join an organisation that has the backing of national government through supporters direct and do your bit to help. Get involved in whatever level you can. No accountancy degrees or detective experience required. The day will come when painters, decorators and labourers will be needed to help sustain a club that they own a share of. That day may not be today or tomorrow but its coming, and its coming to us and most clubs of our level.

This invitation is open to all Pools supporters whoever they are. The only proviso is that you genuinely give a stuff and are prepared to rock the boat occasionally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 6028
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
I was one of a few that did the work in getting the thing started and I believe that it will end up as one of the few achievements of my otherwise pointless existance.

I know a tramp who is particularly grateful for your existence. He asks why you never call him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:18 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
I know a trump who asks the same thing.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:25 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
With all of this evidence that the detectives have pulled together and the fact that it has all been proven to be 100% accurate just how can people be expected to try and pull other fans together?

Like chip has stated. If whats already out there isnt enough for you then you will never be onboard.

I was on jury service years ago and we by 11 to 1 voted not guilty. The one was so delusional it was pointless arguing with her.

Despite over whelming evidence proving innocence.

Her argument. He was on trial so must be guilty. Why else was he on trial.

Its a similar logic being used by some now.

They cannot be talked round.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:27 pm
Posts: 8125
Location: Another planet
On the plus side, after all the online publicity Peter Goldberg/Arber probably needs another new name by now. I suggest Peter Rarf-Thievinget. Nice ring to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
I saw an appeal from Cleveland Police for a missing person obviously no laughing matter but I did notice he had the Worlds best name in Brandon Rainbow. So or if I was Goldberg I'd be calling myself that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 3:59 pm
Posts: 3998
Location: The Town End
I find it strange how people will believe Coxall without a single shred of evidence to support what he says, yet when faced with evidence to cast his claims into doubt its not to be believed.

One man has the power to put everyone's mind a rest, he's appeased some with vague promises of a sustainable future from this housing development. He may genuinely intend to do this, but things just don't add up. I don't understand why people think everyone should blindly support him and the club despite the obvious evidence that things are not going well behind the scenes. It just makes no sense to me at all, of course we all want pools to do well, and we all want the team to win but being concerned about the future of the club at the same time doesn't make people any less of a fan, quite the opposite I think.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 2411
Chip, you may be a bit of a cock, but you're spot on in everything you post in this matter.

_________________
http://i11.tinypic.com/2vwcmeb.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 4:07 pm
Posts: 1065
Chip Fireball wrote:
The problem with Coxhalls plan, is that the land in question would be of a lot more value if the football ground was wiped off the face of the earth, along with the bowls club, skate park, and Millhouse leisure centre. Flatten that lot and you have a fair amount of land slap bang in the middle of town.

Not many folk want to buy luxury apartments with a big dilapidated football ground next to it, but they might if it was not there.

Don't know how fans stand on this, personally I like the football ground exactly where it is, and I'm not sure I would want a new Chester City style 5000 capacity breeze block replacement up Queens Meadow or on the Wynyard Estate. Perhaps I'm just being sentimental, but I don't think it would be the same. That's assuming we even got that much, they might just give us a patch of land and say to the Trust build your own football ground.

The bottom line is that we have owners who put zero into the club, take a lot out of it, and who seem interested only in borrowing against the club to try and make money in the property market. Anyone who questions their motives is an enemy of the club, or a detective, or an armchair expert.

An armchair expert I may be, but I've forgotten more about Hartlepool United then these people will ever know. I also think I am a pretty good judge of popular opinion.

If GC and Akers Belcher think regenerating the town centre means moving the football club and dumping it somewhere the tourists and street café patrons cant see it, they may be under estimating the strength of feeling towards HUFC.

^ This clappp clappp clappp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:51 am
Posts: 376
phil wrote:
There is one thing I really don't get about this regeneration of the town for tourism thing. Who the hell goes to Hartlepool?! Imagine coming here for a holiday, the ugly football stadium must be the least of these people's problems. Either that, or the only legitimate reason anyone visits the town, other than drug trafficking.


This has been a fundamental flaw of successive Town Councils - this mania for attracting "tourists". Any "tourist" arriving in Hartlepool must either have the worlds most defective sat-nav or be a fan of post-industrial nightmare desperation. On a recent "Simpsons" episode the approach to Springfield had a sign saying "Springfield 1 mile - lower your expectations", a modified version of this would be very apt on the A689.
The Local Authority never seem to have a plan to make Hartlepool better for the people who live there, just tidying up Seaton or The Headland or the increasing shabby Marina, for instance. The future is always some grandiose, sun-kissed, cafe society bullshit that ends up knee-deep in litter, blood, vomit and broken glass.
The hopelessness of the Football team just mirrors the hopelessness of the town and the last few pounds and pence are in the process of being chewed off that particular carcass.
The future is fan-owned, and the sooner it arrives the better, regardless at what level we'll be playing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:23 pm
Posts: 1441
Did Coxall seriously own a company called "The Fumb Duck Limited"?

We're fooked, well and truly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:54 am 
I would love to know how much money of their own these new owners of Pools have actually put into the club since they arrived....and also how much they have actually taken out!!!! confised


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 6028
Given that they got the club debt free for absolutely nowt, have sold players and received a fair chunk of TV/cup money. That's not mentioning the loans they've obtained in the clubs name against club assets, where that money is gone/going isn't yet clear.
Not a bad gig really if you have no morals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 10:45 am
Posts: 830
Chrissy Stevo wrote:
I find it strange how people will believe Coxall without a single shred of evidence to support what he says, yet when faced with evidence to cast his claims into doubt its not to be believed.

One man has the power to put everyone's mind a rest, he's appeased some with vague promises of a sustainable future from this housing development. He may genuinely intend to do this, but things just don't add up. I don't understand why people think everyone should blindly support him and the club despite the obvious evidence that things are not going well behind the scenes. It just makes no sense to me at all, of course we all want pools to do well, and we all want the team to win but being concerned about the future of the club at the same time doesn't make people any less of a fan, quite the opposite I think.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


It's fixed in the minds of some people that you 'don't criticise your own'. Once that's your philosophy, facts aren't allowed to matter. For instance, a few years ago, there was some sort of violent incident in the town end, when someone was seriously hurt. Witnesses informed the police who the culprit was and were then criticised by other fans for 'betraying their own'. So, yeah, facts and consequences don't matter at all. Let criminals run riot. Who cares as long as they're your mates.

The other thing to question is the whole idea of who 'The Club' are. The fans are the Club. No-one else. So, raising questions about the current figurehead isn't criticising the club at all, it's criticising him. Again, this is a distinction that escapes people who prefer not to think very much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
It would be much easier to dismantle the club if they were out of the football leagues and have generally less support in the town.
Divide, dismantle and conquer.

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Cloud 9
Chip Fireball wrote:
they may be under estimating the strength of feeling towards HUFC.


clappp

_________________
"We Londoners pride ourselves on not being impressed by anything except the annual visit of Hartlepool's fans" David Hepworth of Mirror Sport on Saturday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
Agree entirely with all of the last few points here.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:49 pm
Posts: 1954
Location: Morpeth
[quote="Chip Fireball"]Ironically the football is one of the few things that does bring visitors to the town- there will be 300-400 up from Plymouth at the weekend, many of whom will stay over. One suspects though that the council considers these the " wrong kind " of visitors and would rather they rocked up somewhere on the outskirts of town, and stayed for as short a time as possible.

Fair point - I only ever return to the town to watch Pools - and each time I guess I'll drop £50 into the local business community via too many pies, even more beers, etc...And I guess I'm not alone in this.

So, the club does bring money into the town - and has, in the past, brought exposure of the town to the media via some success (yes, we have had some), the fancy dress away days, etc.

And yes, the thought of a Chester type breeze block industrial park stadium is horrible - as is the prospect of going the way of so many other depressed, former industrial towns who have lost their football club, their heart and soul and are all but invisible to the rest of the country. Step forward Barrow............Workington......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Posts: 1516
Location: by the small door
Apart from the odd special event like the tall ships race that did attract visitors (at what cost?), the town center/marina is really just for locals. No-one passes through Hartlepool on their way somewhere else. It's never going to be a destination of choice. Therefore the the football club probably attracts more long distance visitors than anything else.

There are still a few positive things about the current situation along with a shedload of negatives

1. the club don't own the ground
2. historic debts were cleared a year ago
3. they didn't sell Carson and Thomas in the transfer window

All we can do now is to continue to be vigilant. Coxall and his mates own the club. When the annual accounts are submitted shortly we may get a better view of the finances and all shareholders should demand an AGM. Perhaps the trust could try and establish how many shareholders it has and ensure that there is a sufficient call for answers at the AGM.

_________________
My glass isn't half full or half empty - its just too small


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:45 am 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
Splod wrote:
Apart from the odd special event like the tall ships race that did attract visitors (at what cost?), the town center/marina is really just for locals. No-one passes through Hartlepool on their way somewhere else. It's never going to be a destination of choice. Therefore the the football club probably attracts more long distance visitors than anything else.

There are still a few positive things about the current situation along with a shedload of negatives

1. the club don't own the ground
2. historic debts were cleared a year ago
3. they didn't sell Carson and Thomas in the transfer window

All we can do now is to continue to be vigilant. Coxall and his mates own the club. When the annual accounts are submitted shortly we may get a better view of the finances and all shareholders should demand an AGM. Perhaps the trust could try and establish how many shareholders it has and ensure that there is a sufficient call for answers at the AGM.


I agree with most of this.

The point about the club owning the ground though. How do we know they even want to? Equally how do we know that the council want to either?

Could it be that demolishing it would suit both parties?

Worrying isnt it?

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Posts: 6028
Pretty sure the Arsenal and Reading models he loves to talk about involved moving to a newly built stadium elsewhere.

Only difference being their old stadia were in areas people want to live in. It truly is baffling, imagine one day going to sponsor Berwick, for example, then deciding the only logical next step would be to take them over and develop houses on the land near their stadium.
The more you think about it the dafter it sounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 2411
Lot of words written about the divide between two see of fans but it basically boils down to one of two things ....

Anyone who doesn't believe this bloke is a conman and a shyster simply doesn't WANT to believe that this man is a conman and a shyster.

or

Those that support him have passed the point of no return when it comes to admitting they have changed their ideation.

_________________
http://i11.tinypic.com/2vwcmeb.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:35 pm 
Bossa Nova wrote:
phil wrote:
There is one thing I really don't get about this regeneration of the town for tourism thing. Who the hell goes to Hartlepool?! Imagine coming here for a holiday, the ugly football stadium must be the least of these people's problems. Either that, or the only legitimate reason anyone visits the town, other than drug trafficking.


This has been a fundamental flaw of successive Town Councils - this mania for attracting "tourists". Any "tourist" arriving in Hartlepool must either have the worlds most defective sat-nav or be a fan of post-industrial nightmare desperation. On a recent "Simpsons" episode the approach to Springfield had a sign saying "Springfield 1 mile - lower your expectations", a modified version of this would be very apt on the A689.
The Local Authority never seem to have a plan to make Hartlepool better for the people who live there, just tidying up Seaton or The Headland or the increasing shabby Marina, for instance. The future is always some grandiose, sun-kissed, cafe society bullshit that ends up knee-deep in litter, blood, vomit and broken glass.
The hopelessness of the Football team just mirrors the hopelessness of the town and the last few pounds and pence are in the process of being chewed off that particular carcass.
The future is fan-owned, and the sooner it arrives the better, regardless at what level we'll be playing.


As you drive into Greatham you may notice the floral displays under the GREATHAM signs at both entrances, note the generally litter free streets and well kept gardens, floral displays in tubs on the high street and a sense of people giving a shit.

As you drive into Hartlepool on the A689, take note of the litter strewn on both sides of the dual carriage way, gets worse near sappers corner and looks a shithole, a sense of people not giving a shit!

We have people who are doing community service, if this council leader wanted to impress people visiting the town, perhaps he should deploy his resource to this area, imagine supporters from nice towns driving along here," Hartlepools a shithole, I wanna go home", before they actually get here :doh:

Please note, the mattress dumped in the village will be removed shortly :naughty:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:52 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
And Arsenals new magnificent stadium is a mere piss up a wall distance from the run down Highbury.

Infact they are more or less next door neighbours.

And the luxury flats that now surround both Highbury and the Emirates are worth millions. Islington or Raby road? Mmmmmmm.

In Hartlepool they will back on to Belk Street.

If that doesnt make the loyalists think, then nowt will.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 10:45 am
Posts: 830
bresslaw wrote:
Lot of words written about the divide between two see of fans but it basically boils down to one of two things ....

Anyone who doesn't believe this bloke is a conman and a shyster simply doesn't WANT to believe that this man is a conman and a shyster.

or

Those that support him have passed the point of no return when it comes to admitting they have changed their ideation.


I think that first statement is probably actionable. No idea what the second one means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Peter Goldberg
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:57 pm
Posts: 9540
Location: Wynyard Golf Club
Nowt we can do innit

_________________
Arguing with idiots is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon, it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board and flies back to its flock to claim victory.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bluestreak, Corner Flag, Essex poolie, Freaky Teeth, JBPoolie, loyal_fan, Mctee1908, millhouseseats, Ozzy Saltburn, poolie1966, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Rinkender, Robbie10, stevven, Stomper409, TforTurner, trevwoody and 393 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.