Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:37 pm
Posts: 98
Blackburn set for double swoop of free agent Wes Brown and Peterborough defender Jack Baldwin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
Blackburn don't exactly seem the greatest move at minute from the outside they look a club in turmoil. I notice they had a crowd of 3,000 the other night. I couldn't see them paying much of a fee either which would be a shame for our sell on clause. They should hold out for Man City to come in with a £20 million bid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:55 am
Posts: 4504
We have a massive sell-on clause for Baldwin..this could be HUGE news for us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
If I was Hignett and we get some cash id be instantly ringing Boro up with £100k for Jackson and then having a sneaky talk to Scunthorpe and seeing why Luke Williams is only sitting on the bench.

I presume it was under Hignett that Williams was here?

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:55 pm
Posts: 1278
Location: back home
tREE_wiTH_hAMStER wrote:
If I was Hignett and we get some cash id be instantly ringing Boro up with £100k for Jackson and then having a sneaky talk to Scunthorpe and seeing why Luke Williams is only sitting on the bench.

I presume it was under Hignett that Williams was here?


Yeah it was during Hignett's time as assistant under Cooper, I believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: EX Hartlepool now in sunny Billingham
Yes any missing pieces in the jigsaw would be great to see us going forward.With a couple of good signings you never know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 7:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:36 pm
Posts: 900
ElvisC wrote:
We have a massive sell-on clause for Baldwin..this could be HUGE news for us.


But is that for pools or for Hodcroft sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:10 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
why would money owed to one party( Pools) be paid to another party (Hodcroft/IOR) ?

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Fetish_Bob wrote:
why would money owed to one party( Pools) be paid to another party (Hodcroft/IOR) ?


Any number of potential contractual reasons.

If I thought there was even a tiny chance of you understanding then I would take the time to try and explain it to you.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 7595
Fetish_Bob wrote:
why would money owed to one party( Pools) be paid to another party (Hodcroft/IOR) ?


It could along the lines of that any potential future income which was agreed during IOR ownership with sell on clauses belongs to them as they negotiated it, no one has any idea about the Terms and Conditions agreed by the sale to the current owners.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Baldwin
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:37 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 4891
Fetish_Bob wrote:
why would money owed to one party( Pools) be paid to another party (Hodcroft/IOR) ?


If for no other reason, this is Pools and therefore anything is possible. And as Hodcroft and Green were in the middle of it. only a fool would believe anything wasnt possible.

_________________
We won't use threats, we won't use fists
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds, yeah
And that's our minds. Yeah


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Exiledpoolie62, fckpoolie, Infidel, Ozzy Saltburn, Pitlad, Snowy, walkep and 333 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.