Kal Naismith Joins Pools On Loan

ed-t-ball · **Posted:** Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:57 pm

http://www.hartlepoolunited.co.uk/news/ ... 00445.aspx

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Another winger to sit on bench?

Hartleblue · **Posted:** Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:20 pm

At this rate we will have a team of contract players and a full team of loanies!

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Trying to beat last years loan quota of 18.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PJPoolie · **Joined:** Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm **Posts:** 15342

Accrington I thought were the best team we played at the Vic last season and this lad was considered one of their better players so even though he's not quite established himself at Portsmouth who have the strongest squad in the division on paper this is a good signing.

alibarthez · **Joined:** Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:06 pm **Posts:** 1072

Tells me Banton has failed to remotely impress. Hope the lad can do the business.

Barriewardrobe · **Posted:** Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:23 pm

Are we typical of a league 1 or 2 club, pre-season you sign what players you can, then from October onwards sign loan players. Obviously this probably wouldn't happen if you're near the top of the league, and with no injury worries. Personally 'long term loanees' are fine, but 30 day one's are pretty much pointless, unless it's an absolute emergency.

PJPoolie · **Joined:** Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm **Posts:** 15342

Barriewardrobe wrote:

Are we typical of a league 1 or 2 club, pre-season you sign what players you can, then from October onwards sign loan players. Obviously this probably wouldn't happen if you're near the top of the league, and with no injury worries. Personally 'long term loanees' are fine, but 30 day one's are pretty much pointless, unless it's an absolute emergency.

They aren't pointless if they help you get points.

Magnus came in for the Dagenham game we won 1-0 and he got man of the match, those three points could be useful come May (when we scrape into the play offs

)

Barriewardrobe · **Posted:** Sat Nov 14, 2015 1:18 am

Chip Fireball wrote:

A 30 day loan signing kept us in the League the last 2 seasons. Hardly pointless.

OK, hopefully we can sign a few more 30 day loan signings, we should make the play-offs ! :laugh:

Bless, some folk like to disagree with someone's post, just for the the sake of disagreeing. And we need to sign a striker (who can't score) on loan, because......
So it's like a 'magic wand' a player who has not played for us before, will suddenly be the answer to all our prayers....get real Chip !

Barriewardrobe · **Posted:** Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:09 pm

PJPoolie wrote:

Barriewardrobe wrote:

Are we typical of a league 1 or 2 club, pre-season you sign what players you can, then from October onwards sign loan players. Obviously this probably wouldn't happen if you're near the top of the league, and with no injury worries. Personally 'long term loanees' are fine, but 30 day one's are pretty much pointless, unless it's an absolute emergency.

They aren't pointless if they help you get points.

Magnus came in for the Dagenham game we won 1-0 and he got man of the match, those three points could be useful come May (when we scrape into the play offs

)

Indeed PJ & Chip, hope I'm proved wrong....(again)

The Fat Man · **Joined:** Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:03 pm **Posts:** 2107

Great ball, great goal. Three points thanks to loan moves!

Barriewardrobe · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:42 pm

Chip Fireball wrote:

Get real ? LOL, I'm the one talking sense .

Luke Williams was a 30 day loan, without which we would have almost certainly gone down. Tshibola, Hughill, you think we would have stayed up without these lads last season ? Or the others like Bingham that came in and got vital goals or Mirfin that helped stop them at the other end.

I wasn't disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, I was disagreeing because what you said ( 30 day loan signing are pointless ) is clearly wrong.

Yes in an ideal world we would have a huge squad of our own players, but we don't live in an ideal world, and if you can bring someone in for 4 or 5 games that's better than the options you have I'm really struggling to see how its pointless.

Chip, I take it ALL back...... clappp

Pooliepaul · **Joined:** Tue May 17, 2011 2:12 pm **Posts:** 119

Hope we can keep him for as long as possible the guy looked different class today.

Hartlepool davey · **Joined:** Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:14 pm **Posts:** 270

The more playing time he gets the better he will be , a goal scoring wide man ask Accrington fans

alibarthez · **Joined:** Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:06 pm **Posts:** 1072

He strolled it. Reminded me of Monkhouse when he joined on loan.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Reminded me of monkhouse in his pomp

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ptbap · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:24 pm

Looked a bit like Monkhouse.

Barriewardrobe · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:03 pm

Barriewardrobe wrote:

Chip Fireball wrote:

Get real ? LOL, I'm the one talking sense .

Luke Williams was a 30 day loan, without which we would have almost certainly gone down. Tshibola, Hughill, you think we would have stayed up without these lads last season ? Or the others like Bingham that came in and got vital goals or Mirfin that helped stop them at the other end.

I wasn't disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, I was disagreeing because what you said ( 30 day loan signing are pointless ) is clearly wrong.

Yes in an ideal world we would have a huge squad of our own players, but we don't live in an ideal world, and if you can bring someone in for 4 or 5 games that's better than the options you have I'm really struggling to see how its pointless.

Chip, I take it ALL back...... clappp

I don't think Mr Fireballl does 'light hearted' banter, do you Chip ?

Kal Naismith Joins Pools On Loan

Gadgies online