Was there really any point in signing the lad if hes not going to play him!. This is the 4th game of his spell and hes barely played, two of which were at home against teams below us! Some of Moore's decisions are baffling me of late.

Especially as he is playing Carroll again who he hooked at half time saturday and basically murdered him in his after match press conf by saying he found out about a few lads, then plays him again today.

Today we'll need players to step up and put their big boy pants on and I havent seen any evidence that Carroll is capable of that either in defense and especially in midfield. He is powder puff, doesn't look to be able to beat a man and looks lost.

From what I have seen of Banton I've not been too impressed but he at least deserves a chance to give us an attacking outlet and impetus.

And he's picked Featherstone again

I really dont understand why he wasnt given a start in the two home games when we are supposed to take the game to the opponent. I just dont understand why he brought him in if hes not going to play him! Waste of a loan

He needs to start playing him so he can have the type of impact like other loan signings of 14/15 like Atkinson, woodman and Armstrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cos ultimately we signed him to make it look like trying. Shit signing after signing and going towards the number we signed last season if not careful

He hand a chance to being him on went Magnus went off injured but instead he chose Kudus. I know he scored a couple for the reserves midweek but you get the impression Banton was just a panic signing to get someone in

How does Carroll start games I wouldn't have him on the bench, I think ronnie picks players who he likes but not ofor football talent , he says they wouldn't be here if they were good , bollocks ! other unfashionable teams in this league manage to sign players , pools have always had this problem but we have had some bloody good players over the years