Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 2:20 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 1262
Location: Land of the Kimchi
An absoloute load of bollocks this is...........it should be headline of the 'Daily Sport' not the BBC

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27435624

banghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 8:06 am 
I guess the BBC have recently invested our money in some renewable energy companies. What a load of bollocks!

I've noticed their coverage of the fracking nonsense has been much higher than any other news agency, talking up the negative effects.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:27 pm
Posts: 8125
Location: Another planet
I guess the BBC have recently invested our money in some renewable energy companies.

Bad guess they aren't allowed to reinvest our money in that way.


What a load of bollocks!

Certainly looks that way. Maybe they mean there would only much left if none was imported
in which case it would be true but still bollocks because it is being imported.

I've noticed their coverage of the fracking nonsense has been much higher than any other news agency, talking up the negative effects.

Could be because they are independent of the financial institutions and lobbying cabals that seem to be obsessed with the joys of fracking. Anything that gives gives Gideon Osbourne a massive erection has to have a down side.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 8:44 am 
a) The BBC investing money bit is a joke, was making fun of the pro-environmental stance they always take
b) Sensationalist bollocks then.
c) Anything that stops us from importing can only be a good thing. The BBC haven't given any positives on fracking, only the environmental effects for affected areas which in my opinion is more bollocks :laugh:

The BBC would be more credible in my eyes if they stopped calling women's football 'football' and putting it on the sports pages as if it's a proper sport, stopped sensationalist environmental headlines and stopped over reporting on anything to do with Rupert Murdoch.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:27 pm
Posts: 8125
Location: Another planet
You should write in, misogynists who favour world destruction and champion sleazy media barrons are an under represented minority.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:00 am 
born toulouse wrote:
You should write in, misogynists who favour world destruction and champion sleazy media barrons are an under represented minority.


Damn right, the BBC are a just and fair organisation after all.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: What
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:27 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Sittin on the Fence
I've only got approx 1 weeks worth of olive oil left. Should I panic Buy? :(

_________________
"Takeaways are for life, not just treats or special occasions or Xmas! (The Bishop)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: 1stockton, Bluebones, charltonclive, dykey, Flying Hogans, Freaky Teeth, Jamie1952, JBPoolie, Mulvaney, MutleyRules, Rinkender, Stocksfield_Poolie, stupoolie, WindyMilitant and 289 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.