Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:14 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:50 pm 
Flinders: 7 - calm and composed.
Austin 8 - excellent, a real footballer, can see why he was so highly rated at Darlow.
Pistol 8 - his best game for us but not a left-back.
Big Sam 9 - superb, a rock.
Liddle 8 - read the game well, very composed.
Monky 7 - did ok but a little peripheral at times.
Jones 8 - great to have him back, a terrier.
Humps 7 - solid and effective but we need a bloke who can play the killer ball.
Brown 8 - looked to be getting back to something like his best before his injury.
Behan 7 - did better as the game went on but needs to learn to bend his runs.
Boyd 6 - frustrating.

Subs:
McSweeney 7 - got stuck in.
Groinlick 7 - looks a prospect.
Sweeney - little time to impress.

Excellent three points and another clean sheet. clappp clappp


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:47 pm
Posts: 99
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
Flinders: 7 - calm and composed.
Austin 8 - excellent, a real footballer, can see why he was so highly rated at Darlow.
Pistol 8 - his best game for us but not a left-back.
Big Sam 9 - superb, a rock.
Liddle 8 - read the game well, very composed.
Monky 7 - did ok but a little peripheral at times.
Jones 8 - great to have him back, a terrier.
Humps 7 - solid and effective but we need a bloke who can play the killer ball.
Brown 8 - looked to be getting back to something like his best before his injury.
Behan 7 - did better as the game went on but needs to learn to bend his runs.
Boyd 6 - frustrating.

Subs:
McSweeney 7 - got stuck in.
Groinlick 7 - looks a prospect.
Sweeney - little time to impress.

Excellent three points and another clean sheet. clappp clappp


sctatchinghead 8 and 9s? wow u really see the game differently to me but hey I like your positiveness :razz: the defence played well, but creativity from the midfield and forwards was none exsistent. Very drab encounter, infact no replace drab with shit bbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:17 pm 
Only players who deserve more than a 7 is the defence.. nuff said


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:34 pm 
The most I would give is a 7 to one or two....that's it!!!! confised

But Over The Parrot with the 3 Points!!!! :coool:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
8s and 9s :laugh:

Can tell he works for the Mail. No clue at all.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
Flinders: 7 - calm and composed.
Austin 8 - excellent, a real footballer, can see why he was so highly rated at Darlow.
Pistol 8 - his best game for us but not a left-back.
Big Sam 9 - superb, a rock.
Liddle 8 - read the game well, very composed.
Monky 7 - did ok but a little peripheral at times.
Jones 8 - great to have him back, a terrier.
Humps 7 - solid and effective but we need a bloke who can play the killer ball.
Brown 8 - looked to be getting back to something like his best before his injury.
Behan 7 - did better as the game went on but needs to learn to bend his runs.
Boyd 6 - frustrating.

Subs:
McSweeney 7 - got stuck in.
Groinlick 7 - looks a prospect.
Sweeney - little time to impress.

Excellent three points and another clean sheet. clappp clappp


Sorry OO but you are clearly an idiot or just on the wind up. I defended you earlier when people queried whether you should be banned but if you are going to post such rubbish then you should be banned IMO.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
hang on... I thought this was a forum for people to express their opinions. If you cant discuss it with maturity and just resort to name calling and pathetic smilies then shouldnt it be you who should be banned?

Im one to talk like :laugh:

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
misterb2001 wrote:
hang on... I thought this was a forum for people to express their opinions. If you cant discuss it with maturity and just resort to name calling and pathetic smilies then shouldnt it be you who should be banned?

Im one to talk like :laugh:


:roll: :laugh:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:27 pm
Posts: 2175
Location: Frodsham where ladies have plums in their mouth
misterb2001 wrote:
hang on... I thought this was a forum for people to express their opinions. If you cant discuss it with maturity and just resort to name calling and pathetic smilies then shouldnt it be you who should be banned?

Im one to talk like :laugh:


Do you realise that Grave and OO are the same person and they're on the wind up!!!

I understand that in these circumstances three exclamation marks are obligatory

_________________
I think I know A Short Cut


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:27 am 
I heard that Master.OO done shite in his Maths at Junior School!!!! confised confised

therethere


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Frodraff wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
hang on... I thought this was a forum for people to express their opinions. If you cant discuss it with maturity and just resort to name calling and pathetic smilies then shouldnt it be you who should be banned?

Im one to talk like :laugh:


Do you realise that Grave and OO are the same person and they're on the wind up!!!

I understand that in these circumstances three exclamation marks are obligatory


Im most certainly not the same person as OO :laugh:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Flinders- 8
Austin- 8
Hartley- 7
Liddle- 7
Collins- 7
Brown- 4
Monkhouse- 4
Humphreys- 6
Jones- 7
Behan- 5
Boyd- 6

Hope that helps.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
Can you please include decimal points in future.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Yubep wrote:
Can you please include decimal points in future.


Just the decimal point?

Or numbers after it?

And if so, to how many decimal places would suffice? :laugh:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 414
Mr Ripper wrote:
Yubep wrote:
Can you please include decimal points in future.


Just the decimal point?

Or numbers after it?

And if so, to how many decimal places would suffice? :laugh:


Im sure 2 decimal places will be adequate. Especially seems as though Boyd was a 5.75 on saturday. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:30 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37694
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
Flinders: 7 - calm and composed.
Austin 8 - excellent, a real footballer, can see why he was so highly rated at Darlow.
Pistol 8 - his best game for us but not a left-back.
Big Sam 9 - superb, a rock.
Liddle 8 - read the game well, very composed.
Monky 7 - did ok but a little peripheral at times.
Jones 8 - great to have him back, a terrier.
Humps 7 - solid and effective but we need a bloke who can play the killer ball.
Brown 8 - looked to be getting back to something like his best before his injury.
Behan 7 - did better as the game went on but needs to learn to bend his runs.
Boyd 6 - frustrating.

Subs:
McSweeney 7 - got stuck in.
Groinlick 7 - looks a prospect.
Sweeney - little time to impress.

Excellent three points and another clean sheet. clappp clappp

The right to post, does not give you the right to be taken seriously.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The ratings that count
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Snowy wrote:
Obafemi Obsession wrote:
Flinders: 7 - calm and composed.
Austin 8 - excellent, a real footballer, can see why he was so highly rated at Darlow.
Pistol 8 - his best game for us but not a left-back.
Big Sam 9 - superb, a rock.
Liddle 8 - read the game well, very composed.
Monky 7 - did ok but a little peripheral at times.
Jones 8 - great to have him back, a terrier.
Humps 7 - solid and effective but we need a bloke who can play the killer ball.
Brown 8 - looked to be getting back to something like his best before his injury.
Behan 7 - did better as the game went on but needs to learn to bend his runs.
Boyd 6 - frustrating.

Subs:
McSweeney 7 - got stuck in.
Groinlick 7 - looks a prospect.
Sweeney - little time to impress.

Excellent three points and another clean sheet. clappp clappp

The right to post, does not give you the right to be taken seriously.


:laugh:

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: charltonclive, Corner Flag, Darylmore, Devo, Flying Hogans, itwontwork, Jamie1952, Jazzmorgans123, JBPoolie, Kettering Poolie, loan_star, Mikey76, millhouseseats, Ozzy Saltburn, paulus the woodgnome and a side salad, pollyo, Poolie24, Poolie27, Poolie_merv, Porter’s porter, PTID, Rinkender, Robbie10, Sandman, Snowy, Stomper409, Sussex UK, Tonto1968, trevwoody, WindyMilitant and 259 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.