Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 8:46 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: new left back?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:15 pm
Posts: 239
do any of you think it will be happening now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 11
Maybe in January?

Just as crucial is centre midfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
no, i think with the defenders we have at our disposal we should be fine, if Turner is going to be looking to improve one position, it should be a leader in Central Midfield

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:40 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
poolie 95 wrote:
do any of you think it will be happening now?



Silliest question of the season so far. Which as it only 8 days old takes some doing.What do you base the question on. One performance, when the current LB has probably not put a foot wrong in the previous games.(Did you see any of them). Or is it lets pick a position and simply have a go at whoever is playing in it.

I should have just moved on and ignored it. As I said silliest post of the season so far and will probably still be it when the season finished.

Just realised use name Poolie95 it probably means your 14. At least I wasn't abusive.

Even for 14 it's pretty stupid.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
Spot on Bob.

I dont suppose the critics have taken into consideration the fact that Hartley is young, will have been nervous on his home debut, and will have been trying too hard. Oh and was probably jaded from wednesday, like all of the looked.

Oh, and I forgot to add one very small minor detail:

Charlton were bloody good. :evil:

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:55 am 
I don't think it was a silly question. Of all the positions that should or could've been strengthened in the summer, left back should've have been third on the priorty list behind a goal keeper & a right back. For the simple fact, we should not have players playing out of position as they have done for the past two seasons, because it has really hurt us!

Granted, I had not seen the two previous performances, and Charlton did have a very good right winger, but the sooner we are able to play Hartley at Centre half the better. Defensive confidence on yesterday's performance still looks very very fragile. If Hartley plays in his proper position, he certainly looks as if he will be a good signing.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:15 pm
Posts: 239
Fetish_Bob wrote:
poolie 95 wrote:
do any of you think it will be happening now?



Silliest question of the season so far. Which as it only 8 days old takes some doing.What do you base the question on. One performance, when the current LB has probably not put a foot wrong in the previous games.(Did you see any of them). Or is it lets pick a position and simply have a go at whoever is playing in it.

I should have just moved on and ignored it. As I said silliest post of the season so far and will probably still be it when the season finished.

Just realised use name Poolie95 it probably means your 14. At least I wasn't abusive.

Even for 14 it's pretty stupid.



i was not having a go at anybody but turner named the left back position as one of his main priorities and signing a centre back is not going to solve that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
LSPoolie wrote:
I don't think it was a silly question. Of all the positions that should or could've been strengthened in the summer, left back should've have been third on the priorty list behind a goal keeper & a right back. For the simple fact, we should not have players playing out of position as they have done for the past two seasons, because it has really hurt us!

Granted, I had not seen the two previous performances, and Charlton did have a very good right winger, but the sooner we are able to play Hartley at Centre half the better. Defensive confidence on yesterday's performance still looks very very fragile. If Hartley plays in his proper position, he certainly looks as if he will be a good signing.

personally, i would put Hartley as 4th choice centre back at the moment behind Collins, Clark and Liddle. He can and has played left back several times before and has impressed there. He will play well in 75% of games in that position (which is 60% better than last season).

I think yesterdays performance highlighted where our main weakness lies...

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:33 pm
Posts: 198
As Bob said what a stupid post. Hartley played well at Mk and as fantastic at Coventry. He was a bit off the pace yesterday but i would rahter play him left back then centre back! He played there at York when Collins went off and at Gatshead and in my opinio he is a better left back than CB! I think he will be a good player for us! Why the go at Hartly??? Why not Mcsweeny???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:16 pm
Posts: 844
Location: With the man in the wind and the west moon
I'm mates with Peter and I'm sure he was nervous as hell playing in front of his home crowd, watched by all of his friends and family and hoping he wouldn't put a foot wrong. He didn't play well yesterday, but he was up against a tricky winger, Monkhouse gave him barely any cover and, as ADG said, he was trying a bit too hard. He's not a left back, but I feel much more confident with him there than Humphreys.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:15 pm
Posts: 239
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
poolie 95 wrote:
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.

but we dont need one as Hartley can quite competently play there. If Hartley got injured, then we may need one

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:11 pm 
I don't think the lad has posted something 'silly' to be honest.

Hartley is a centre back doing a job at left back, he is still a square peg in a round hole. Fair enough he's done a very good job in a couple of games and can clearly play left back but we still need an out and out left back in the squad. Sweeney did well at right back in some games last season it didn't mean he was the answer.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
misterb2001 wrote:
poolie 95 wrote:
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.

but we dont need one as Hartley can quite competently play there. If Hartley got injured, then we may need one


To be totally honest he did not look like a left back (although I admit to only having seen him play in yesterdays game). He looked like a centre half trying to play as a left back. If what Kolley Kibber says is true about him being nervous etc then maybe it is unfair to judge him on yesterdays game. Hopefully if he gets more comfortable playing there he will improve.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Grave wrote:
misterb2001 wrote:
poolie 95 wrote:
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.

but we dont need one as Hartley can quite competently play there. If Hartley got injured, then we may need one


To be totally honest he did not look like a left back (although I admit to only having seen him play in yesterdays game). He looked like a centre half trying to play as a left back. If what Kolley Kibber says is true about him being nervous etc then maybe it is unfair to judge him on yesterdays game. Hopefully if he gets more comfortable playing there he will improve.


it obviously would be better to play a left back at left back. But from Turners point of view, if there isn't a decent enough left back to bring in, then wait until one becomes available. Hartley or even Austin would be able to do more than a decent job at it.

I wouldn't call them square pegs in round holes, more oval pegs in round holes :wink:

As Chip rightly said, central midfield is our main issue at present.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
poolie 95 wrote:
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.


Check the close season signings , we did sign a left back................... Neil Austin, played more games at left Back for Barnsley than he did at right back. Perhaps that was Turner's idea all along and hence the signing of Haslam,for right back. As Austin was still getting over a slight injury he has played Hartley there because he had no other option open to him. Hence Austin coming on yesterday to give him some match practice, with maybe Turner thinking the game was beyond us. and not making a more attacking substitution when he had the chance. Just a thought.

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Kolley Kibber wrote:
I'm mates with Peter and I'm sure he was nervous as hell playing in front of his home crowd, watched by all of his friends and family and hoping he wouldn't put a foot wrong. He didn't play well yesterday, but he was up against a tricky winger, Monkhouse gave him barely any cover and, as ADG said, he was trying a bit too hard. He's not a left back, but I feel much more confident with him there than Humphreys.



Are you mates with all the players?

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:08 pm 
Fetish_Bob wrote:
poolie 95 wrote:
i was never trying to have a go at Hartley! i was saying turner said he needs a left back and he has not signed one. Hartley is a center back and that is what he was signed as so we still need a left back.


Check the close season signings , we did sign a left back................... Neil Austin, played more games at left Back for Barnsley than he did at right back. Perhaps that was Turner's idea all along and hence the signing of Haslam,for right back. As Austin was still getting over a slight injury he has played Hartley there because he had no other option open to him. Hence Austin coming on yesterday to give him some match practice, with maybe Turner thinking the game was beyond us. and not making a more attacking substitution when he had the chance. Just a thought.


Austin was signed as a right back because he's right footed and is a right back! He can however fill in at left back.Turner was on Radio Boro talking to Ali Brownnose long after the signing of Austin stating that he was still on the lookout for a left back. We don't have a specialist left back in the squad and haven't since Hugh Robertson left the club and before that Mark Robinson.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 6476
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
Kolley Kibber wrote:
I'm mates with Peter and I'm sure he was nervous as hell playing in front of his home crowd, watched by all of his friends and family and hoping he wouldn't put a foot wrong. He didn't play well yesterday, but he was up against a tricky winger, Monkhouse gave him barely any cover and, as ADG said, he was trying a bit too hard. He's not a left back, but I feel much more confident with him there than Humphreys.



Are you mates with all the players?


I am guessing they are a similiar age so would have played football together when they were younger or went to school together maybe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:16 pm
Posts: 844
Location: With the man in the wind and the west moon
Fensy wrote:
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
Kolley Kibber wrote:
I'm mates with Peter and I'm sure he was nervous as hell playing in front of his home crowd, watched by all of his friends and family and hoping he wouldn't put a foot wrong. He didn't play well yesterday, but he was up against a tricky winger, Monkhouse gave him barely any cover and, as ADG said, he was trying a bit too hard. He's not a left back, but I feel much more confident with him there than Humphreys.



Are you mates with all the players?


I am guessing they are a similiar age so would have played football together when they were younger or went to school together maybe


But idiot wouldn't realise that would he?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:16 pm
Posts: 844
Location: With the man in the wind and the west moon
chip fireball wrote:
pretty sure kolley played for the boro and hartley played for sunderland, so hartley has probably kicked the living shiit out of him in the past as well. rolfl rolfl sadx


Or the other way round :wink:

He was a striker and I was a left back in our younger days, though I never played against Peter at academy level. He's a school year younger than me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
How silly of me not to realise people who are guessed to be a similar age all went to school together :roll:

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
How silly of me not to realise people who are guessed to be a similar age all went to school together :roll:


Dont you know anything :roll: :laugh:

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:24 pm
Posts: 7529
Location: Rocking my soul in the bosom of Abraham
Grave wrote:
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
How silly of me not to realise people who are guessed to be a similar age all went to school together :roll:


Dont you know anything :roll: :laugh:


Why are you talking to yourself.

_________________
Dont need no country,wont fly no flag
Cut no slack for the Union Jack,Stars & Stripes got me jet lagged


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
GroovyCrimes wrote:
Grave wrote:
Tree_With_Hamster wrote:
How silly of me not to realise people who are guessed to be a similar age all went to school together :roll:


Dont you know anything :roll: :laugh:


Why are you talking to yourself.


rolfl rolfl rolfl

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
Kolley Kibber wrote:
I'm mates with Peter and I'm sure he was nervous as hell playing in front of his home crowd, watched by all of his friends and family and hoping he wouldn't put a foot wrong. He didn't play well yesterday, but he was up against a tricky winger, Monkhouse gave him barely any cover and, as ADG said, he was trying a bit too hard. He's not a left back, but I feel much more confident with him there than Humphreys.


It was a terrible game for the kid to make his debut. That winger was superb, and Monkhouse was not at the races either. I felt for him. A hartlepool lad who will have been desperate to have a great game. I hope he keeps his place tomorrow, he deserves another chance.

Just for once you would hope the MH terrace would have looked after one of its own. Sadly some didnt. Lets just hope his confidence wasnt dented.

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:33 pm
Posts: 198
He is a better left back then centre back with what i ahve seen! He should play tomorrow as he has only had one bad game! At coventy especially he was superb!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:15 pm
Posts: 239
no one ever said he did absolutley crap did there?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
poolie 95 wrote:
no one ever said he did absolutley crap did there?


To be honest, I felt he REALLY struggled on saturday but hopefully it was the nerves to blame and he was up against a very decent player. I certainly didnt booern him or anything. He is new to competitive league football if he is used to playing in the reserves/youth teams so it may take time. At least we have Austin as a back up.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new left back?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
i thought he was average at best on saturday but have no doubts that he will develop into a very good player over time. He is already better than what we had last season and the defense overall will concede less goals. We just have to start scoring now!

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, BansteadPoolie, blueste1, bobby lemonade, charlesI, Essex poolie, Hawklord, JBPoolie, Kebab&chips, loan_star, loyal_fan, mander, millhouseseats, Mute Witness, MutleyRules, Pigeonace1, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Robbie10, Splod, stevven, Stomper409, stupoolie, Sussex UK and 217 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.