Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Wed Jul 16, 2025 1:41 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Rose signing
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:49 pm
Posts: 1506
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html

_________________
Trust the Trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Posts: 2361
Location: The Town End
i hope so :grin: !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
He hasn't made many appearances like has he? 70 in 3 years!

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:04 am 
aptid wrote:
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html


Who suggested it was 'dead?'

Stockport are in a state of upheaval and CT has been on holiday all week.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:49 pm
Posts: 1506
Oh dear, it must have been me.

_________________
Trust the Trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
PJ_Poolie wrote:
aptid wrote:
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html


Who suggested it was 'dead?'

Stockport are in a state of upheaval and CT has been on holiday all week.

there were a lot of suggestions on here that as Stockport are being took over then they would cancel the deal. Whereas i think thats what the Administrators were waiting for sctatchinghead

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:07 am 
misterb2001 wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
aptid wrote:
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html


Who suggested it was 'dead?'

Stockport are in a state of upheaval and CT has been on holiday all week.

there were a lot of suggestions on here that as Stockport are being took over then they would cancel the deal. Whereas i think thats what the Administrators were waiting for sctatchinghead


If he wants to come here how can they cancel the deal? Even if they are taken over they still have to come out of admin that just doesn't happen automatically.

I think people just panic if we don't sign four players a day, pre season training doesn't even start for 11 days, plenty of time I'm confident the gaps in the squad will be filled.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:50 pm
Posts: 1113
Location: Hartlepool
Aye, a goalie (or two) would be nice! :grin:

_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand Binary, and those who do not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
PJ_Poolie wrote:
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html

Who suggested it was 'dead?'

Stockport are in a state of upheaval and CT has been on holiday all week
there were a lot of suggestions on here that as Stockport are being took over then they would cancel the deal. Whereas i think thats what the Administrators were waiting for sctatchinghead

If he wants to come here how can they cancel the deal? Even if they are taken over they still have to come out of admin that just doesn't happen automatically.

I think people just panic if we don't sign four players a day, pre season training doesn't even start for 11 days, plenty of time I'm confident the gaps in the squad will be filled.


because he's under contract, if he played a certain amount of games last season it triggered another year, we agreed with the administrators to waive the year deal, but i believe it all depends on what the people taking over say, i could be completely wrong like

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:06 pm 
misterb2001 wrote:
PJ_Poolie wrote:
Sky still running with the story, maybe it isn't dead

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 28,00.html

Who suggested it was 'dead?'

Stockport are in a state of upheaval and CT has been on holiday all week
there were a lot of suggestions on here that as Stockport are being took over then they would cancel the deal. Whereas i think thats what the Administrators were waiting for sctatchinghead

If he wants to come here how can they cancel the deal? Even if they are taken over they still have to come out of admin that just doesn't happen automatically.

I think people just panic if we don't sign four players a day, pre season training doesn't even start for 11 days, plenty of time I'm confident the gaps in the squad will be filled.


because he's under contract, if he played a certain amount of games last season it triggered another year, we agreed with the administrators to waive the year deal, but i believe it all depends on what the people taking over say, i could be completely wrong like


He's WAS under contract before they went into administration. Even if they are taken over they will still be in admin until they have a creditors meeting and the creditors are 'happy'. Due to them being in administration he probably hasn't been getting paid which means the previous contract is not really worth the paper it's written on because it's been breached.

If he wants to come their is very little Stockport can do take over or no take over.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37590
MadJohn wrote:
Wouldn't worry too much about his shortage of games. As I understand it, it's not down to injury, or at least it wasn't last season. I know it sounds like extravagance to us, but I believe Stockport had TWO left backs last season ( :shock: ) and the other one had a great season and kept Rose out of the team for quite a while.
TWO LEFT BACKS!!!........ that sounds like a novel concept. :wink:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rose signing
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm
Posts: 1278
If the other one was keeping him out, why aren't we signing him ?

_________________
Form is temporary
Class is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: BansteadPoolie, Brian Honour's Left Foot, Flying Hogans, Jamie1952, JohnnyMars, Jules, Krampesh, Mctee1908, MutleyRules, Ozzy Saltburn, Smokin Joe, Snailwood2, Splod, stevven, stupoolie, TFP, TheNoose, WindyMilitant and 236 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.