I suppose if you don't laugh you'll cry.

Scores on the doors from the Ripper jury?

Lee-Barrett- 4
Liddle- 3
Humphreys- 3
Collins- 2
Nelson- 4
Jones- 5
Monkhouse- 7
Clark- 7
Sweeney- 9
Porter- 3
Parker- 3
Nardiello- 3


Three players worthy of their wages. The rest a total crock of shite. I'm glad beer isn't illegal yet.

We played better than that like, the manner we lost in was infuriating but players didn't warrant twos and threes.

Some of the low marks are for skill levels, some are for application. Some are a mixture of both. We were woeful for the most part.

Apart from ten spineless minutes we were the better team, other than those ten minutes didn't they even have any efforts on goal?

We should have scored four or five.

Humphreys and Liddle didn't have bad games, Collins had a good game until one mistake got punished. I actually thought Ben Clark was one of our poorer performers (he really now Jones is back should be playing centre back) the game in the main passed him by.

I'd go;

ALB 5

Liddle 6
Humphreys 6
Collins 6
Nelson 5

Jones 7
Clark 5
Sweeney 8
Monkhouse 6

Porter 6
Parker 6

We've played worse and won this season, our problems are always the same and nothing has been done to address this.

Why do people lick our number 3's rear?? He is terrible, some passes - i use that word loosely - was woeful and wayward, infact, not some, most of them!!!!

Player of the century, pah!

I'd have had Darren Knowles ahead of him.

Were you there Sat? How do you know?

I saw him behind the Millhouse stand at half time like Mr O

Well if he was there he will have seen Humphreys play ok. It was the centre rarves who were culpable.

I was in the Mill House as Fensy said, infact i was chatting to his kid bro' for a bit.

No. 3 didnt play 'OK' at all, or is that he played OK in comparrison to his usual antics?
The centre backs should have had Neil Harris in their back pockets but decided not to bother I guess! Too much effort and running.

The 3rd goal was a bit of a howler like. Oh dear.

Humphreys was a decent player up to late 2005. Since then he has been a complete joke and has averaged about a goal a game against us. Frankly I would have chased him after the last promotion. As for player of the century, what a joke that is. As was said before; some people would vote for him in a bonnie baby competition. Even if he wasn't in it.

That said he will get a new contract in the summer because he still has those photos of Ken Hodcroft with Max Mosley. (allegedly)

fine but can you at least admit he had a half decent game on Saturday?

Are you for real? Is this the same game that their winger tortured him everytime and Humphreys never once managed to even block one of his crosses? Fuck me it was a good job he took that knock and went off at half time.

erm crosses? i remember one maybe two crosses from them in the entire game, you better take off your 'ihatehumphriesbecauseimacunt tinted specatcles'

That bit about Ritchie is nonsense pj.

He had a good run during the game where he got past a couple of opposition players. That was ALL he done! In the whole of the 90 mins he failed to prevent either right winger (one was replaced injured at half time) from getting a cross into the box. He was diabolical. Admittedly its not his fault that his legs have gone and he is no left back but if that sort of performance gets an 'average' rating then im at a loss to explain how he could ever get a pitifully low score.

There is some real arselicking goes on here. Its this sort of reluctance to see the 'old guard' for what they bring to the team which has partly resulted in the club suffering of late. He was 'ok once, now he isnt and his performances are nowhere near good enough.

We desperately need an external manager to come in who owes no loyalty to such players and banishes the dead wood (Before it is too late)

Thats complete and utter garbage MrB. There were at least ten times that game in which the winger got a cross in despite Ritchies best efforts. He never prevented one! If Matty Robson had done this then he would be getting booed.

I dont hate Ritchie, its just that I can see him for what he is, shiit.

Why the fook would I, or countless others, need to 'arselick' players
You are a low watt bulb sometimes, Grave

I think by " arselicking" he means that certain posters who love Richie will fail to notice the numerous times their winger skinned him or got crosses in without Richie even being quick enough to raise a foot to block it. They just block it from their memory because its Richie.

apologies, replace the word 'arselick' with 'bum'.

Thats the one.

Humphreys has failed to cut out a single cross this season

Not particularly wanting to fall into the hate him, or love him groups, but I do remember one attempted cross in the first half that he blocked, which went back onto their player, and went behind for a goal kick, much to the annoyance of the Millwall fans, who presumably thought it should have been a corner.

I think the vilification of Humphries has reached virus proportions, it's an almost cartoonesque like reaction that his every action is condemned ..he's become the beacon of abuse for every swivel eyed cospiracy theorist and closet bully boy who needs a scapegoat. He's not as good as some thonk he is and not as bad as some would like to believe he is ... but who could we blame if we didn't have him? ...

spot on Snowy.

The funny thing is, he wasnt responsible at all for the joke defending on saturday that lead to the three goals.

But lets blame him anyway.

He also wasnt responsible for all the missed chances at the end either.

And he doesnt pick the "Hologram" in goal either. Who owns the copyright to that by the way?

Agree completely.

Also liked the Officer Crabtree moment there.

Utter gubbins Grave, total nonsense.

He should have been left out recently, but to say he had a bad game on Saturday quite simply isn't true. You mention crosses, I don't remember a single instance of a Millwall player putting over a cross in the game in open play. They only attacked for ten minutes in which we shipped three goals and nether full back was at fault for any of them.

Snowy is spot on, FFS 'arselicking' is now giving someone 6 out of 10

Pj their winger got several crosses past him. Everytime he receieved the ball, he either skinned him or managed to cross the ball without Humps even raising a foot.

As I said before, some people just dont choose to see these incidents because its Richie.

and some people choose to see these incidents because it's Ritchie.

Liddle let many crosses past him, but not a word get's said about that - presumably becasue it's not fashionable to knock him (though give it time... )

and some people completely over exaggerate things in a negative way because its richie. The fact is he was not hammered by a winger on saturday and he stopped several crosses. Probably got skinned twice at most. Overall he had a half decent game.

I agree people see what they want to see with certain players and I dont think I have ever nocked richie on here as he has been a brilliant player for the club but his time has came and past, would like to see him go to the coaching staff but his future now shouldnt be in the starting 11.

he would be perfect for the bench or for a role in the midfield. The problem with richie is that he is a midfielder being played out of position. People are getting angry at richie when they are too stupid (yes im calling them stupid) to realise that its the managers fault he is playing there. He gives his all in a position he isnt very good at every week and thats all he can do.

richie for the position of the new mark tinkler

Lee-Barrett
McCunnie Clark Nelson Liddle

Humphreys
Sweeney Jones Monkhouse

Porter Parker

Complete tosh

hey grave, i think there is a pattern developing here. I have an opinion and yours is the complete opposite. How cool is that!

Have you ever considered the possibility that there are no facts at all, ever, not just about football but about the world generally? There are just people making statements and other people contradicting them.

I think Richie should stay left back.........













.....in the changing rooms.

This post should be deleted for being the oldest and least funny joke ever.

I concur, a new low for the Bunker.

Tree, just stick to what you know and call him a 'lovely lovely person' in future, OK?