Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:36 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm
Posts: 755
agreed

_________________
The Scotty Syndrone - Dont give in to it - you know it make sense - too late you've got it already


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:52 pm 
turner out


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:40 pm
Posts: 3561
Location: Still trying to find myself
Scotty out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
tits out

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:04 pm
Posts: 2361
Location: The Town End
rat out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:07 pm 
no6bus wrote:
tits out


do you mean turner and west or the more female variety? sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
i would have took nardiello off when he first felt his twinge and brought on foley for him, put guy up front (who harldy ever got passed to today - bad teamwork) and foley on the wing. Would have then brought rowell on for Clark. We would have won, I knows it.

Why was guy hardly ever passed to?

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:11 pm
Posts: 614
katcha wrote:
i would have took nardiello off when he first felt his twinge and brought on foley for him, put guy up front (who harldy ever got passed to today - bad teamwork) and foley on the wing. Would have then brought rowell on for Clark. We would have won, I knows it.

Why was guy hardly ever passed to?

pissed me off that too, he stuck to the touchline and was wide open for most of the game but was just ignored for the big punt up field


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:38 pm 
Offline
Partially Top Guano Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:09 pm
Posts: 11204
Location: i am busy right now, can i ignore you some other time?
katcha wrote:
i would have took nardiello off when he first felt his twinge and brought on foley for him, put guy up front (who harldy ever got passed to today - bad teamwork) and foley on the wing. Would have then brought rowell on for Clark. We would have won, I knows it.

Why was guy hardly ever passed to?


Because we think we can only attack down the left

_________________
I was awoken last night by Darlo fans in the street playing football with a hedgehog
I was absolutely digusted and about to call the RSPCA when the hedgehog went 1-0 up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:35 pm
Posts: 523
Fetish_Bob wrote:
katcha wrote:
i would have took nardiello off when he first felt his twinge and brought on foley for him, put guy up front (who harldy ever got passed to today - bad teamwork) and foley on the wing. Would have then brought rowell on for Clark. We would have won, I knows it.

Why was guy hardly ever passed to?


Because we think we can only attack down the left


What left the only thing on the left wing was space


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
jumbodabber wrote:
Fetish_Bob wrote:
katcha wrote:
i would have took nardiello off when he first felt his twinge and brought on foley for him, put guy up front (who harldy ever got passed to today - bad teamwork) and foley on the wing. Would have then brought rowell on for Clark. We would have won, I knows it.

Why was guy hardly ever passed to?


Because we think we can only attack down the left


What left the only thing on the left wing was space


we attacked down the left all game!!!!!!! It was the right wing that we never used!

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:39 pm 
Very occasionally we went down the right & Guy looked sharp. Nardiello I thought was shit, never won a header all game, didn't look particularly interested & doesn't have the common sense to know when he should pass the ball & when to hold it, gave the ball away time & time again trying to be too clever - you may have guessed, I don't like him!!! Wheere was Mr Lange today?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:40 pm 
Out injured for a month. Dislocated his shoulder v Leicester.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:35 pm
Posts: 523
Because we think we can only attack down the left[/quote]

What left the only thing on the left wing was space[/quote]

we attacked down the left all game!!!!!!! It was the right wing that we never used![/quote]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
jumbodabber wrote:
Because we think we can only attack down the left


What left the only thing on the left wing was space[/quote]

we attacked down the left all game!!!!!!! It was the right wing that we never used![/quote][/quote]

sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 6475
Cowboy wrote:
Very occasionally we went down the right & Guy looked sharp. Nardiello I thought was shiit, never won a header all game, didn't look particularly interested & doesn't have the common sense to know when he should pass the ball & when to hold it, gave the ball away time & time again trying to be too clever - you may have guessed, I don't like him!!! Wheere was Mr Lange today?


I also wasn't that impressed MR C, i lost count the amount of times that he turned and beat a man only to turn back into him to try and beat him again and then losing the ball


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:15 pm 
Was this MOM against MK Dons ?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: jonny rowell ???
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:28 am
Posts: 971
Location: you will find me here there and everywhere
chip fireball wrote:
starts one game, gets man of the match, is never seen again.

if ever a game was crying out from some creativity from midfield that was it.

instead we had 90 minutes of clark and liddle in each other pockets playing head tennis.

very poor management mr turner.


I concur fully. :evil:

Liddle and Clark were dreadful

_________________
78 revolutions a minute now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: BigJeffy, Bostonpoolie, garthwd, Kettering Poolie, Mctee1908, Ozzy Saltburn and 219 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.