Bitter Arseholes

Reefmonkey · **Joined:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm **Posts:** 755

aido87 wrote:

shutupshutupshutupshutupshutup banghead

Oh I guess I'll have to then seing that you want me to rolfl

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22665

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:33 pm

Mr I wrote:

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

Careful Mr I, this conversation may break out into normal sensible one with posts like that :wink:

parmopooly · **Posted:** Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:35 pm

I thought MacKay came up trumps tonight and he really surprised me, well done to him.
Gives us more options if he can keep that up, well done Michael.

Reefmonkey · **Joined:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm **Posts:** 755

Mr I wrote:

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

Fair point but I still think the majority on would have expected him to start tonight especially with what the options were, that said Mackay did do better tonight

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:49 pm

Reefmonkey wrote:

Mr I wrote:

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

Fair point but I still think the majority on would have expected him to start tonight especially with what the options were, that said Mackay did do better tonight

there is no doubt in my mind that he will become a regular starter once he 'settles in'

Dugoutpaddy · **Joined:** Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:23 am **Posts:** 1772

Reefmonkey wrote:

misterb2001 wrote:

but you still stand by the pathetic statement of "he is not what we need at this moment" when you have seen precisely 0 mins of this kid in action. You could have said you will withold judgement, but no you have written him off. Idiot

I do stand by my statement (pathetic in your opinion perhaps) which was 'I dont think he is what we need at the moment' how come I cant have an opinoin on not having seen him play when all the rest of you on here can have your view ALSO without having seen him play - double standards me thinks. I have not written him off where have I said that? It may be he is the next Ronaldo with similar skills but his age and experience may mean he is not what we need at the moment - I could have said that I would withold judgement but I opted not too, my choice because at that moment in time based on what I knew of him I (thats me) didnt think he was what we need at the moment

Oh and I see that the personal insults are back - I have a view and you dont agree yet I'm the idiot - I thought all the kids hung about on another board

Now I get it Ronny, you talk in scribble

Should have guessed really, just couldn't see it through the shite
HEY but heres hope

You might welcome to the board :grin:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37440

Reefmonkey wrote:

Mr I wrote:

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

Fair point but I still think the majority on would have expected him to start tonight especially with what the options were, that said Mackay did do better tonight

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

Obafemi Obsession · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:01 pm

Snowy wrote:

Reefmonkey wrote:

Mr I wrote:

He's only just arrived and gone on the bench. Seems perfectly normal to me.

Fair point but I still think the majority on would have expected him to start tonight especially with what the options were, that said Mackay did do better tonight

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

Good post Snowy. And no analogy!

Reefmonkey · **Joined:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm **Posts:** 755

Snowy wrote:

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

On that basis neither have you or anyone else so we may as well close the board down now

Frodraff · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:22 pm

Reefmonkey wrote:

Snowy wrote:

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

On that basis neither have you or anyone else so we may as well close the board down now

Oh Aye!

Reefmonkey · **Joined:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm **Posts:** 755

Frodraff wrote:

Reefmonkey wrote:

Snowy wrote:

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

On that basis neither have you or anyone else so we may as well close the board down now

Oh Aye!

So you agree that only selected people are allowed to express and opion - I rest my case and stand by the comment

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:44 pm

Reefmonkey wrote:

I rest my case and stand by the comment

i wish you'd rest your mouth.... :evil:

Frodraff · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:16 pm

[quote="Reefmonkey]

So you agree that only selected people are allowed to express and opion - I rest my case and stand by the comment[/quote]

I now see what everyone is objecting to. Nark/wind up?

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Reef - sadly this place is full of retards. You get used to them.

Spender · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:20 am

Considering that the average supporters bus doesn't set off from Oxford, Cambridge, The Inns Of Court, The London School of Economics, The Sorbonne or even Harvard, by referring to everyone as 'retards' (the most unimaginative of insults, and patently cribbed from a very average American film) perhaps you miss out quite a lot of middle ground??

Mind it never did trouble you that much........ :roll:

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:07 pm

BLOODY HECK THAT WAS HARD WORK banghead

phew

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37440

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Reef - sadly this place is full of retards. You get used to them.

So why do you keep posting here then?

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37440

Reefmonkey wrote:

Snowy wrote:

The 'majority on here' don't pick the team, Turner does. Therefore, all selections, tactics and general circumstances are his and his alone, so your input is surplus to requirements. This may come as a surprise to you and you may feel you have the right to have some input, but you don't... geddit?

On that basis neither have you or anyone else so we may as well close the board down now

There is a subtle difference, which like a dogs whistle, is way beyond your comprehension,.... but you'll carry on anyway, morally supported by Tree howling at the moon and you performing word contortions that outdo even the Red Arrows contortions with their aircraft.

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:36 pm

Snowy you are indeed a Legend, the board is great reading just for your replies clappp

Bitter Arseholes

Gadgies online