A Cull on Rarfism

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22665

We're going to have a spate of temporary bans which may be made permanent if the rarfism continues after the temp ban.

Gentlemen, your suggestions please.

tigro · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:44 pm

what is rarmism????? :shock:

BernardCribbensUSA · **Joined:** Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:48 pm **Posts:** 186

i variation of being a doyle ?

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22665

tigro wrote:

what is rarmism????? :shock:

The state of being a rarf. The act of posting shite or posting for the sole intention of annoying everyone.

tigro · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:49 pm

damn..........thats me fooked then sadx

bluemonkey · **Joined:** Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:54 pm **Posts:** 1101

Gentlemen, your suggestions please.

How about Tree but only for 24 hours either side of a match?.

katcha · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:15 pm

i take it you are asking for users to suggest other users?

may cause some issues

but

tree with hamster
reef monkey
talbot avenger and chip fireball somedays :grin:

and i wouldnt make the top two just temporary.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:17 pm

katcha · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:24 pm

only overloked you as you been on a sabbatical!

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:31 pm

bluemonkey wrote:

Gentlemen, your suggestions please.

How about Tree but only for 24 days either side of a match?.

sounds good to me!!! :laugh:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

You can tell a message board is on its arse when admins start asking for nominations for bans.

Very grown up.

WGAFF · **Joined:** Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:51 pm **Posts:** 282

or what about a 24 hour ban after the match for the likes of ECG, PoolieKev after we get thrashed 4-0 away from home and everythings still rosey?? confised

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:18 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

You can tell a message board is on its arse when admins start asking for nominations for bans.

Very grown up.

how ironic....one of the most childish wind-up posters in recent times using the words "very grown up" :laugh:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

misterb2001 wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

You can tell a message board is on its arse when admins start asking for nominations for bans.

Very grown up.

how ironic....one of the most childish wind-up posters in recent times using the words "very grown up" :laugh:

I think those nominating people for bans are the more childish ones.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:21 pm

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

misterb2001 wrote:

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

You can tell a message board is on its arse when admins start asking for nominations for bans.

Very grown up.

how ironic....one of the most childish wind-up posters in recent times using the words "very grown up" :laugh:

I think those nominating people for bans are the more childish ones.

i think there should be some middle ground, no bans, but no wind up posts either, that way everybody will be happy.....apart from you as we still have Turner in charge and ALB in between the sticks :laugh:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Agreed.

WGAFF · **Joined:** Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:51 pm **Posts:** 282

its a message board ffs, if people have a change of opinion so be it...if we'd got beat 3-0 last night EVERYONE would be shouting for Turner out and a proper manager in. :roll:

WGAFF · **Joined:** Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:51 pm **Posts:** 282

dont take yourself so fuckin serious you not nice people. :roll:

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

WGAFF wrote:

dont take yourself so f*** serious you c***. :roll:

Me?

WGAFF · **Joined:** Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:51 pm **Posts:** 282

No, not you, you paranoid twat.
Tree you make sense, sometimes, well A-LOT of the times compared to some of the more established posters on here. ffs bring back the old days when if you had a view about the club you wouldnt expect your windows out on the same night!!

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Tree posts a lot more sense than he is given credit for.

He also posts a shed load of stuff that I feel is written to provoke people into an argument. If he cut out the sh**e he could easily be one of the best contributors on here.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Tree posts a lot more sense than he is given credit for.

He also posts a shed load of stuff that I feel is written to provoke people into an argument. If he cut out the sh**e he could easily be one of the best contributors on here.

Am touched :laugh:

BillinghamPoolie · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:18 am

You certainly are!! bbolt

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

Tax Paying Poolie wrote:

Tree posts a lot more sense than he is given credit for.

He also posts a shed load of stuff that I feel is written to provoke people into an argument. If he cut out the sh**e he could easily be one of the best contributors on here.

Am touched :laugh:

Don't be.

I still think you're a tw*t!

:laugh:

WGAFF · **Joined:** Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:51 pm **Posts:** 282

Salty · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:02 am

I hate t osee the bunker ruined by these cun ts

if they cant see after a gentle nudge like this tthat they are being c untish and dont wind their necks in them ban em and good fookin riddance to supertwat and his pain in the fookin arse cronies [big bite, that should please the stupid fookin tailend :roll:

]

wnakers the fooking lot of em!

CLIQUE RULES OK! :P :roll:

Salty · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:03 am

in the meantime I'm orfski

someone text me when the bunkers back to nermal, ta loves :grin:

Frodraff · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:07 am

zzzzzzzz

Spender · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:16 am

WGAFF wrote:

or what about a 24 hour ban after the match for the likes of ECG, PoolieKev after we get thrashed 4-0 away from home and everythings still rosey?? confised

You could always start self harming I suppose. :roll:

Anyway seeing the last time I can remember that 0-4 away happened was 2002, I'd call that grounds for optimism, wouldn't you??

Oh no of course not. :grin:

katcha · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:14 am

chip fireball wrote:

katcha wrote:

i take it you are asking for users to suggest other users?

may cause some issues

but

tree with hamster
reef monkey
talbot avenger and chip fireball somedays :grin:

and i wouldnt make the top two just temporary.

i could do with yet another ban tbh, ive got a shitload of important stuff on at work, and at the end of a day thats more important than a meaasge board.

you won't have time to fart from Monday confised

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:29 pm

chip fireball wrote:

katcha wrote:

i take it you are asking for users to suggest other users?

may cause some issues

but

tree with hamster
reef monkey
talbot avenger and chip fireball somedays :grin:

and i wouldnt make the top two just temporary.

i could do with yet another ban tbh, ive got a shitload of important stuff on at work, and at the end of a day thats more important than a meaasge board.

Have you 2 phones to answer now like.. :wink:

BillinghamPoolie · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:14 pm

Spender wrote:

WGAFF wrote:

or what about a 24 hour ban after the match for the likes of ECG, PoolieKev after we get thrashed 4-0 away from home and everythings still rosey?? confised

You could always start self harming I suppose. :roll:

Anyway seeing the last time I can remember that 0-4 away happened was 2002, I'd call that grounds for optimism, wouldn't you??

Oh no of course not. :grin:

I was thinking something similar, when I read that, but couldn't be arsed to check how long it is since we actually lost 4-0 away.

GroovyCrimes · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:21 pm

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

how long it is since we actually lost 4-0 away.

Blackpool October 18 2003

*Taken from in the mad crowd

BritishWestHpool · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:35 pm **Posts:** 1243

From someone who doesnt post very much on here anymore - though does view (and sometimes is pleased he does and sometimes wishes he hadnt wasted the time):

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions.

Its the response to POK everytime he posts - whether its a seemingly pointless or irrelevant post (though of course that is the moderators name and other more established posters are allowed to get away with such things) or actually a decent point he makes. He must have a right thick skin cos sometimes on here its akin to fox hunting and ripping the poor bugger apart. Its painful and sad to read (in my opinion)

Its the fact (for me) that so many just love a good complain, nothings right or ever will be, the worlds so fucked up, all these people are bounders and smackheads and this and that - and thats even before the football.

Of course I'm not saying people shouldnt be allowed to complain (I dont have any influence in the board anyway and no'one probably gives a toss what I think) but it does get wearing at times. And being honest, the main reason I dont post on the board very much at all is that I hardly ever see a match these days and so its hard to comment when you dont see anything or anyone. But certainly the above points all contribute pretty heavily to me....

Pierrepoint · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:04 am **Posts:** 1723

I'm surprised the doom mongers are not out in force today (then again we could just rerun the pre Stoke threads and change the name to West Ham to save them the bother) .

bobby lemonade · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:13 pm

the world is going to end in 2012! :shock:

Frodraff · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:16 pm

chip fireball wrote:

i wouldnt trump at work anyway. its unprofessional for a start.

and it kills canaries

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:00 pm

BritishWestHpool wrote:

From someone who doesnt post very much on here anymore - though does view (and sometimes is pleased he does and sometimes wishes he hadnt wasted the time):

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions.

Its the response to POK everytime he posts - whether its a seemingly pointless or irrelevant post (though of course that is the moderators name and other more established posters are allowed to get away with such things) or actually a decent point he makes. He must have a right thick skin cos sometimes on here its akin to fox hunting and ripping the poor bugger apart. Its painful and sad to read (in my opinion)

Its the fact (for me) that so many just love a good complain, nothings right or ever will be, the worlds so f*** up, all these people are bounders and smackheads and this and that - and thats even before the football.

Of course I'm not saying people shouldnt be allowed to complain (I dont have any influence in the board anyway and no'one probably gives a toss what I think) but it does get wearing at times. And being honest, the main reason I dont post on the board very much at all is that I hardly ever see a match these days and so its hard to comment when you dont see anything or anyone. But certainly the above points all contribute pretty heavily to me....

Excellent post BWH and you are right about POK :wink:

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

townendtimmy wrote:

BritishWestHpool wrote:

From someone who doesnt post very much on here anymore - though does view (and sometimes is pleased he does and sometimes wishes he hadnt wasted the time):

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions.

Its the response to POK everytime he posts - whether its a seemingly pointless or irrelevant post (though of course that is the moderators name and other more established posters are allowed to get away with such things) or actually a decent point he makes. He must have a right thick skin cos sometimes on here its akin to fox hunting and ripping the poor bugger apart. Its painful and sad to read (in my opinion)

Its the fact (for me) that so many just love a good complain, nothings right or ever will be, the worlds so f*** up, all these people are bounders and smackheads and this and that - and thats even before the football.

Of course I'm not saying people shouldnt be allowed to complain (I dont have any influence in the board anyway and no'one probably gives a toss what I think) but it does get wearing at times. And being honest, the main reason I dont post on the board very much at all is that I hardly ever see a match these days and so its hard to comment when you dont see anything or anyone. But certainly the above points all contribute pretty heavily to me....

Excellent post BWH and you are right about POK :wink:

I CONCUR

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6475

bobby lemonade wrote:

the world is going to end in 2012! :shock:

So the Government is wasting all of our money on the Olympics and we won't actually be here to see them :shock:

LeicesterPoolie 2 · **Joined:** Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:20 pm **Posts:** 127

can't you just 'ignore' the posters, who get on your tits

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:17 pm

LeicesterPoolie 2 wrote:

can't you just 'ignore' the posters, who get on your tits

that would leave me talking to myself :laugh:

GroovyCrimes · **Posted:** Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:23 pm

Fensy wrote:

bobby lemonade wrote:

the world is going to end in 2012! :shock:

So the Government is wasting all of our money on the Olympics and we won't actually be here to see them :shock:

Best news Ive had all day

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22665

BritishWestHpool wrote:

From someone who doesnt post very much on here anymore - though does view (and sometimes is pleased he does and sometimes wishes he hadnt wasted the time):

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions.

Its the response to POK everytime he posts - whether its a seemingly pointless or irrelevant post (though of course that is the moderators name and other more established posters are allowed to get away with such things) or actually a decent point he makes. He must have a right thick skin cos sometimes on here its akin to fox hunting and ripping the poor bugger apart. Its painful and sad to read (in my opinion)

Its the fact (for me) that so many just love a good complain, nothings right or ever will be, the worlds so f*** up, all these people are bounders and smackheads and this and that - and thats even before the football.

Of course I'm not saying people shouldnt be allowed to complain (I dont have any influence in the board anyway and no'one probably gives a toss what I think) but it does get wearing at times. And being honest, the main reason I dont post on the board very much at all is that I hardly ever see a match these days and so its hard to comment when you dont see anything or anyone. But certainly the above points all contribute pretty heavily to me....

[/quote]

Theres definitely food for thought in that.

tREE_wiTH_hAMStER · **Joined:** Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am **Posts:** 20758

BritishWestHpool wrote:

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions

Best and most correct quote of the week.

misterb2001 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:19 am

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

BritishWestHpool wrote:

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions

Best and most correct quote of the week.

i love your 'selective hearing'. Ignore the part that describes you to a tee..........

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:44 pm

My definition of rarfism is conduct, in a context of banter, that you wouldn't accept anywhere, not just on a messageboard.
My yardstick is this: if this was a discussion in a pub rather then on t'Interweb and someone kept seriously pissing everyone off every time he entered the circle (a circle of varying composition), for whatever reason, then he'd be a rarf and get the cold shoulder from everyone but those who enjoy a good out-rarfing contest.

aido87 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:47 pm

so is mankyreeftree with disorder banned or what ?

Reefmonkey · **Joined:** Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:01 pm **Posts:** 755

Tree_With_Hamster wrote:

BritishWestHpool wrote:

Its not just rarfism from a select few, its the response to rarfism - and its the fact that some things are considered rarfism by long term posters just because they dont agree with their own opinions

Best and most correct quote of the week.

Totally agee

Mr Creosote · **Joined:** Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:05 pm **Posts:** 1887

Aye agee two.

A Cull on Rarfism

Gadgies online