To save you from possible hanging at some time in the near futur, you may wish to come on the baord and answer these questions.

1. Ali Gibb. Just what exactly does he give the team that you love so much?

You see none of us see it. Sorry.

2. Lee Bullock. Similar to above.

3. David Foley. What the hell has happened to the player who was man of the match two games on the trot?

I have a feeling you have left him out to make room for Ali Gibb. If true, that is not clever.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Kind Regards

Mr ADG.

sorry mr AGED
BUT I AM THE REAL DANNY WILSON
Foley was doing his homework
ali was imitating Icey as he was a crowd favourite for two whole weeks
lee bullock was imitating another Lee Bullock a former footballer

come and see me on Saturday
i did get you tvs around the ground last night so you could see Jeff i know he was on the pitch but he looks better on the screen

Doesnt look like it.

As the last remaining member of the Danny Wilson Fan club, maybe you could answer for him.

Well answer the questions yer tw@t.

I want three answers.

So get on with it Danny.

Fank you.

For your pwompt and kind wesponse.

Can I be your fwiend?

So you agree then that 4 4 2 isnt working?

Ah .... the old 4-4-2 question, this has been a constant source of debate amongst the professionals in the game and as no consensus has been arrived at the could confirm universal acceptance in the professional management ranks but I have to say that the flexibillity inherent in the formational format we adopt is suited to the conditions prevalent at the time the match is held and therefore requires a certain amount of fluidity in our response to the said conditions and this leads to the speculative formational equation propagated by Brian Paperclip that any formation is a good formation if you are victorious but a bag of shite if you lose and therefore can only be ananlysed post match in a clinical and functional manner discarding misplaced criticism and supporter non supportive input from the unhelpful non positive factions prevalent. I hope this is some help to you.

Dear Danny

Suppose the cost function (in$) to manufacture x items is given by:

C(x) = ((1/3)x^3) – ((2x)^2) + kx + 10.

1.How do I find the value of k so that C(x) has exactly one
horizontal tangent line?

2.How do I identify the value of x at the place where the above
unique horizontal tangent line occurs?

3.How then do I compute the cost in manufacturing the item, if x is
the value you computed in question 2 and k is the value computed in
question 1.

4.How do I find the value of k so that y = 2x is a tangent line to
the parabolic curve y = x^2 + k.

5.A manufacturer of widgets that the cost to produce x widgets can be
calculated by: C(x) = ((.1x)^2)-10x+10000. What is the marginal
cost?

6.Still working on 5, what is the marginal cost when x is 10?

7.Still working on 5, how do I find the value for x for which the
cost is the maximum?

8.If y = x^x then how do I find (dy/dx) at x = e?

9.How about if y = Ln[Ln[x]] then how do I find (dy/dx) at x = e?

Thanks!

Hope you have the time to help here Danny:

Q1. What can scientific, technical and socio-economic analyses contribute to the determination of what constitutes dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system as referred to in Article 2 of the Framework Convention on Climate Change?

Q2. What is the evidence for, causes of, and consequences of changes in the Earth’s climate since the pre-industrial era?

a. Has the Earth’s climate changed since the pre-industrial era at the regional and/or global scale? If so, what part, if any, of the observed changes can be attributed to human influence and what part, if any, can be attributed to natural phenomena? What is the basis for that attribution? i'm trying to work the team out for Saturday, so can I you to a number of publications I wrote which you may find beneficial in your research .....



b. What is known about the environmental, social and economic consequences of climate changes since the pre-industrial era with an emphasis on the last 50 years?

Q3. What is known about the influence of the increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, and the projected human-induced change in climate regionally and globally on:

a. the frequency and magnitude of climate fluctuations, including daily, seasonal, inter-annual, and decadal variability, such as the El Nino-Southern Oscillation cycles and others?

b. the duration, location, frequency and intensity of extreme events such as heat waves, droughts, floods, heavy precipitation, avalanches, storms, tornadoes, and tropical cyclones?

c. the risk of abrupt/non-linear changes in, among others, the sources and sinks of greenhouse gases, ocean circulation and the extent of polar ice and permafrost? If so, can the risk be quantified?

d. the risk of abrupt or non-linear changes in ecological systems

Q4. What is known about the inertia and time-scales associated with the changes in the climate system, ecological systems, and socio-economic sectors and their interactions?

Q5. What is known about the regional and global climatic environmental, and socio-economic consequences in the next 25, 50 and 100 years associated with a range of greenhouse gas emissions arising from scenarios used in the TAR (projections which involve no climate policy intervention):

To the extent possible, evaluate the:

- projected changes in atmospheric concentrations, climate and sea level;

- impacts and economic costs and benefits of changes in climate and atmospheric composition on human health, diversity and productivity of ecological systems, and socio-economic sectors (particularly agriculture and water);

- the range of options for adaptation, including the costs, benefits and challenges; and

- development, sustainability and equity issues associated with impacts and adaptation at a regional and global level..

Q6. How does the extent and timing of the introduction of a range of emissions reduction actions determine and affect the rate, magnitude and impacts of climate change, and affect the global and regional economy, taking into account the historical and current emissions?

Q7. What is known from sensitivity studies about regional and global climatic, environmental and socio-economic consequences of stabilizing the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (in carbon dioxide equivalents), at a range of levels from today’s to double that level or more , taking into account to the extent possible the effects of aerosols? For each stabilization scenario, including different pathways to stabilization, evaluate the range of costs and benefits, relative to the range of scenarios considered in question 5, in terms of:

- projected changes in atmospheric concentrations, climate and sea level, including changes beyond 100 years;

- impacts and economic costs and benefits of changes in climate and atmospheric composition on human health, diversity and productivity of ecological systems, and socio-economic sectors (particularly agriculture and water);

- the range of options for adaptation, including the costs, benefits and challenges;

- the range of technologies, policies and practices that could be used to achieve each of the stabilization levels, with an evaluation of the national and global costs and benefits, and an assessment of how these costs and benefits would compare, either qualitatively or quantitatively, to the avoided environmental harm that would be achieved by the emissions reductions;

- development, sustainability and equity issues associated with impacts, adaptation and mitigation at a regional and global level.

Q8. What is known about the interactions between projected human-induced changes in climate and other environmental issues, e.g., urban air pollution, regional acid deposition, loss of biological diversity, stratospheric ozone depletion, and desertification and land degradation? What is known about the environmental, social and economic costs and benefits and implications of these interactions for integrating climate change response strategies in an equitable manner into broad sustainable development strategies at the local, regional and global levels?



Q9. What is known about the potential for, and costs and benefits of, and timeframe for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?

a. What would be the economic and social costs and benefits, and equity implications of options for policies and measures, and the mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol, that might be considered to address climate change regionally and globally?

b. What kind of economic and other policy options might be considered to remove existing and potential barriers and to stimulate private- and public-sector technology transfer and deployment among countries, and what effect might these have on projected emissions?

c. What portfolios of options of research and development, investments, and other policies might be considered that would be most effective to enhance the development and deployment of technologies that address climate change?

d. How does the timing of the options contained in a, b and c affect associated economic costs and benefits, and the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases over the next century and beyond?



Q10. What are the most robust findings and key uncertainties regarding attribution of climate change and regarding model projections of:

- future emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols;

- future concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols;

- future changes in regional and global climate;

- regional and global impacts of climate change; and

- cost and benefits of mitigation and adaptation options?

so you just couldnt be bothered to give up your time to answer could you.