Boydie as well.....

Always going to be Boydy wasnt it

Deflected too

Good job he started on the bench or he probabaly would have scored 3 or 4 past our clown.

after 4 wins in a row we go to the game which, on paper, should have been the easiest and lose it

To be fair Tree if a shot is deflected and the keepers already commited then there isnt much he can do.. Even tho i am still not convinced by keeper or Wilson

Not quite over yet.....

Where did I comment he was at fault today????

I see Foley is on again

Probably your most informative post.

the bunker will be back alive tonight then
started at each other all ready

we were awful in the second half

we were awful in the second half

We will continually be awful with that clown in goal and no recognised full backs. But Wilson STILL cannot see it

Very informative.

tree, you're an idiot

What have I said thats wrong?

I had hoped he would only warm the bench down there and get sent back and we could maybe nick him on loan but there goes that idea.

Still Wilson seems very happy with our clown in todays paper.

Dimi is not coming back.
Posting after every game we lose saying we need a new goalkeeper is just as bad as the people who bump up threads after we win.
You're like that little annoying 'lovely lovely person' in the corner who never shuts up.
Or Headlander.

Its like trying to have a conversation with children......

most children i know would have kicked your whining teeth down your throat by now

I would of said 'fcuking whining cnuting teeth', but I get your drift

Lee-Barrett wasn't at fault for the goal, it took a deflection. In the second half Orient wanted it more than us. We didn't close them down like we did in the first half. We had some decent chances in the first half but didn't create much at all in the second half. The goal was a bit lucky being deflected but Orient deserved the win.

Sounds like our game at Carlisle.
Not much difference between the teams but one team wanted it more.

I never said ALB was at fault. Jesus cant you lot read posts????

Im saying the same problems still exist that did before our little run started and indeed through it. Nothing has changed. We had 2 games where the opposition were so shite they managed 1 shot on goal each and we got 2 clean sheets and suddenly peopel creamed their pants. Our full backs and keeper are still not good enough and till its addressed then we wont go any further.

But he plays for Swansea.

nah i wont dig out the critical posts of dimi

'Peopel creamed their pants'

The way you are going, you will win the medal for most over reactive poster from Leeds Poorlie

i think the problem that people have Tree, is that we ALL know where our weaknesses are, yet you feel the need to highlight them every 20 minutes.

and it seems like you actually hope ALB has a bad game just so you can ram it down peoples throats.

Exactly. We're not Chelsea, we can't just sign who we want. We all know our weaknesses, as I'm sure Wilson does.

I have to agree.

Thats the trouble, he cant see the weaknesses.

how do you know?

well if he can see the weaknesses and he has refused to do anything about it, ie

* the goalkeeper situation
* and the fact we need a left back,
*oh and the fact we should have replaced barker mid season if wilson wanted rid of him

then wilson isnt doing his job properly is he

We all knew last season we needed a full back or two and a keeper and yet he didnt sign one.
Even this season a loan signing could have been made with regard to these positions but nothing has happened.

your last point is completely ridiculous Grave, Wilson had a chance to bring in a better player (Kyle) and did, how is that a negative???

The Goalkeeper situation (although Wilsons fault for originally signing them both) HAS been attempted to be resolved, you and i both know it. Wilson has been told he HAS to get rid of one before he can bring one in, he tried to get rid of Budtz and it fell through. So he CAN see that weakness, he just hasnt been able to do owt about it so far

left-back? who knows if he has tried to get someone else in but we would have to get rid of someone first. Who? I hardly doubt Turner/IOR would allow the club captain/player of the century to leave.

sorry but the barker/kyle argument is probably the most ridiculous thing i have ever read on this board

Regarding Trees comments on ALB, I see where he's coming from..if you bought a car and had to spend a lot of time and effort putting right niggly things that should have been working in the first place you have a right to feel pee'd off....to say it works reasonably well now, begs the question why not get a reliable model in the first place and avoid all the hassle.

That's the problem with buying second hand cars, unless you're a REALLY good mechanic, you're never 100% sure how good a car you are getting.

Oy! cut that out, BP. Snowy has exclusive rights to the use of car analogies on this board.

Sorry.

Fookin right have I ... thank you for pointing that out Mr Head, the cheque is in the post, the usual fee.

Maybe the thing is Mr Hamster, if you weren't so condescending and superior sounding in your missives, people might take you a bit more seriously. If your mission is to get peoples backs up just for the sake of doing so, then you should be Chief Executive of the Supreme Principle of the Effective Rarfishness Mission.

Or SPERM for short..

Bet you do one with CU NT in it or summat.

The 'C' would obviously be China/Chinese etc....

Tree may be a miserable sod bit I dont think he would not be sad enough to spend hours trying to think of some silly acronym to be honest.

Really? How exactly does he spend his time then, Grave? We're all a bit intrigued about Tree...from a purely psychological point of view

He mostly spends his time completing times crosswords and when he wants somehting a bit more of a challenge he visits this board and tries to understand the folk on here

(allegedly)