Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:40 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:29 pm 
Offline
My real name is ADG, Don't take me seriously, I'm a fat Victor Meldrew on a wind up.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:05 pm
Posts: 1887
Dickenson clearly practices free kicks daily.

We get one on the edge of the box, and its taken by Ben Clark who has hardly kicked a ball in anger all season.

So what the hell do we practice in training? stpid stpid banghead banghead

_________________
Gone for good. Worn down by the Nish haters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm
Posts: 3115
Mr Creosote wrote:
So what the hell do we practice in training? stpid stpid banghead banghead


Defending sadx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22657
Both Jonny Wilkinson and David Beckham were obsessive about practicing free kicks long after the training session had finished. Nuf said!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:49 pm 
I wonder when they practiced them the keeper stood five yards off his line? You know like ALB does. I'm no goalkeeping expert but surely you giving yourself a better chance if you are on your line? Giving yourself more time to see and save it also making it less likely that you'll be lobbed banghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
Mr I wrote:
Both Jonny Wilkinson and David Beckham were obsessive about practicing free kicks long after the training session had finished. Nuf said!


Think that goes by the name of "commitment" these players just dont have any.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:49 pm
Posts: 178
Why when we take free kicks do we touch before hand sctatchinghead

All this means that you are taking it a fraction wider to bend it around the wall but allowing the defenders to charge you down stpid

So it always gets blocked or goes miles over the bar sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:37 pm 
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
Mr I wrote:
Both Jonny Wilkinson and David Beckham were obsessive about practicing free kicks long after the training session had finished. Nuf said!


Think that goes by the name of "commitment" these players just dont have any.


Honestly mate are you really a Pools fan? I mean why do you come out with drivel like that?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
Shall we all go fishing??? Seems to be a good spot this bunker place i know!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:15 pm 
I love people who spout shite, then when people react claim they were 'fishing for bites'. No you were just spouting shite.

Grow up.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
You constantly spoute shite and you are actually serious with it, which is quite unfortunate! I use this board to take the urine out of people like you! Now and again i'll say something worth while, until then, i'll continue on the wind up... clappp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:21 pm 
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
Shall we all go fishing??? Seems to be a good spot this bunker place i know!


Is that like 'I'm going to make you angry for my own entertainment??" sctatchinghead

OK, sit tight, I'm going round your mams house with a box of matches.....this'll be a fookin' hoot..... :roll: :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
Fire away "mate"...... you heading Stranton Cemetry way like you fuucckking litte prick of a man!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:23 pm 
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
You constantly spoute shite and you are actually serious with it, which is quite unfortunate! I use this board to take the urine out of people like you! Now and again i'll say something worth while, until then, i'll continue on the wind up... clappp


So saying our players (the ones who play for the club you claim to support) don't have any commitment is being 'on the wind up'. Hilarious.

stpid


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:23 pm 
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
You constantly spoute shite and you are actually serious with it, which is quite unfortunate! I use this board to take the urine out of people like you! Now and again i'll say something worth while, until then, i'll continue on the wind up... clappp


Oh yeah, incidentally, here's a wind up for you...... refyellow

Next time, you're dust.... :grin: :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
hope you have a long box of spills :laugh:

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:26 pm 
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
Fire away "mate"...... you heading Stranton Cemetry way like you fuucckking litte prick of a man!!


Why, is her house in Stranton Cemetary like?? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

Oh incidentally, that was personal abuse.

Now that WAS a quality wind up, it took two posts to get you banned. Amateur..... yawn1


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:28 pm 
A shame losing such a high brow contributor to the board, I loved hearing about how great Hull was.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:19 pm 
I'm sure I read on this Thread 'Personal Abuse' directed at him first like....so should he be banned!?!? confised confised

But that photo is funny....who is it???? sctatchinghead :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
i know him!

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 10
No I shouldn't be banned. As you said Mutley, it was directed at me in the 1st place. Keyboard warriors eh!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22657
If everyone was banned for wind ups we'd have a very quiet message board. Dibble and Muttley would have been banned three years ago. Purile childishness is what puts most people off and we've had a bit of that recently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:02 am 
Is the Gaffer Matty Robson's Chin? I'm confused. sctatchinghead


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:23 am 
Yubep wrote:
i know him!


me too!! :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 10
I've seen him around one or twice, he doesnt live in Hartlepool he lives in Ull, which is much better, and nicer than Hartlepool could ever be. The kebabs are better, the pubs are better, the beer is better, the streets are cleaner, the shoes are better, the socks are better, they wear clean pants at least twice a week, and they are much better at wind-ups.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:43 am 
nope, hell!

remember this Mentalist?!

Image


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 10
I do, and all she kept saying was look at him he doesnt come from anywhere!!! crazy lass! But at least your a 'Geordie'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:26 pm 
Can I ask why the lad has been banned? I've seen a lot worse abuse on here go unpunished. And that was from the moderators! :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:36 pm 
:shock:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 10
It's ok, its getting looked at I beleive. Hopefully Matty_Robson's_Chin username will be back soon, until then........ It's this crappy effort. I was looking at BBC when i saw The Gaffer so used that. Daft eh!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:49 pm 
Why have the pics been removed?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:11 pm 
He was banned for personal abuse. We are well aware that he has joined under another name.

Either he toes the line or doesn't. I banned the username, I didn't ban his IPA.

It's now up to him.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
:evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:05 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
the photo has been removed at the request of mr chin.

the ban is being looked at, though its not much of a ban if he is still posting.

the normal process if its felt that a poster is being abusive and possibly acting under the influence of drink is to block a members ability to post for 24 hours to give them time to cool off and reflect.

this has been done to a lot of accounts, my own included.

at the end of the day the board is not a true democracy. it is owned and paid for by a bunker member from his own pocket. if he is pulling out a large sum of money to run the board and keeping it functional in his own time he is within his rights to say who can and who cant post.

if mr chin is, as he says, only using the board to annoy people living in a town he dislikes, then i fail to see why he would object to having his ability to post removed. everyone of us has been guilty of participating in wind-ups in the past, but if your sole function as a member of the board is to provoke people and partake in threads where insults are hurled , you will be banned. membership is a privelege not a right.


He dislikes Hartlepool? He should be horse whipped and shit on.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:32 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37262
The Gaffer wrote:
I've seen him around one or twice, he doesnt live in Hartlepool he lives in Ull, which is much better, and nicer than Hartlepool could ever be. The kebabs are better, the pubs are better, the beer is better, the streets are cleaner, the shoes are better, the socks are better, they wear clean pants at least twice a week, and they are much better at wind-ups.
HULL...? ..if ever there was a case for 'global warming' making the sea levels rise, this was it.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:34 pm 
Didn't Hull win the crappest town in Britain before Boro won it?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:36 pm 
they did and still are IMO, although southampton must be close :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37262
i know the Germans bobmbed it badly, but you'd think they'd make a start at clearing up the fookin mess. :roll:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:46 pm 
is,nt mr creos.. er mr prescott from there?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:48 pm 
Aye.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37262
He was one of their M.P's...a political colossus..... or maybe not. :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
Some parts are horrific East Park, Orchard Park, Most of East Hull & Brandsholme are the instant ones that come to mind. The Docks, marina, the avenues, prinny ave, old town & bev road are all very decent area's. One of my major issues with the city is that they dont do Parmo's!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Hearing about how good Hull supposedly is bores the tits off me.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:20 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37262
I do think having a Costa Coffee in the station and putting palm trees outside the prison give it a certain .....ambience ... much like putting a dado rail on a dredger.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
I sometimes wish it was as good as Hartlepool SUPERB renovated train station :roll: I went in it last weekend to find you walk into another entrance and thats about it.
Just have to see what the goon's at C4 say about it. (if they visit this time)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:31 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37262
Do me a favour pal I was last in Hull ...yesterday... it was a shiit-hole. As for Hartlepool, we all know what it's like and we don't kid ourselves or bull the place up, whereas you come on here like the tourism officer for the Humber Riviera as though it were the City of Atlantis emerging from the ocean depths... it's dump next to wide muddy river... so cut the crap. By the way , if Hartlepools such a dump as you imply, why not give it a wide berth and apply for asylum in the Brigadoon of the East Riding. :roll:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
Its not muddy is it, its silt. Definition of silt: Fine particles of sand or rock that can be picked up by the air or water and deposited as sediment.

If you went down the rough area's you would beleive that. go down the M62 and onto the A63 and check whats down there after you go past Smith & Nephew. I defend the City from people like you putting it down constantly, its far from perfect and i know this. but nowhere is perfect. Some worse than others. Hartlepool has many good points....the marina.
A quality shopping centre. A retail park.

Agree to disagree on this one maybe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
I sometimes wish it was as good as Hartlepool SUPERB renovated train station :roll: I went in it last weekend to find you walk into another entrance and thats about it.
Just have to see what the goon's at C4 say about it. (if they visit this time)


You have to be the world's dullest man.

Our train station is better than yours- give me fucking strength.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2155
It was the 1st example i could think of and seen as though he mentioned Costa Coffee..... makes a bit of sense. AND i heard some lass talking about how good it was while i was waiting for my train to Newcastle. sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:42 am 
yawn1


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Proof if it was needed that we dont practice freekicks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Matty_Robson's_Chin wrote:
It was the 1st example i could think of and seen as though he mentioned Costa Coffee..... makes a bit of sense. AND i heard some lass talking about how good it was while i was waiting for my train to Newcastle. sctatchinghead


She's probably as dull as you.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: bobby lemonade, CathMc70, Corner Flag, garthwd, Gatehouse, Infidel, itwontwork, JBPoolie, jumbodabber, Kettering Poolie, Manchester Exile, Mikey76, MutleyRules, Ozzy Saltburn, Pigeonace1, Poolie24, Pooly_Imp, PTID, Sandman, Sedgefield Poolie, Snailwood2, Snowy, Splod and 233 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.