Are We Hartlepool Or Newcastle United????

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 4:59 pm

What the feck are Pools playing at having a HUGE Portrait of Shearer in the Centenary Suite????

I just can't understand it and it has got me fuming!!!! :evil:

Mick Tait's Head Bandage · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:02 pm

Me too Mutters..........seen it today in the paper, i'm thinking of breaking in just to smear excrement all over it :uhoh:

aptid · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:49 pm **Posts:** 1506

Quote:

What the feck are Pools playing at having a HUGE Portrait of Shearer the future Pools manager in the Centenary Suite????

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22655

What the fuck has he got to do with Pools?

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:12 pm

Its an insult to those that have pulled on a Pools shirt.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:16 pm

Honestly....I'm fecking bouncing about it!!!! rage

I wonder what Mr.Snowy has to say about it????

I think they are trying to justify it by saying that we played Newcastle in the first football match at the Vic....but what the feck has that got to with that whinging kunt who will never ever be Manager of Pools!!!!

:evil:

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22655

I for one will never set foot in that lounge while that monstrosity is hanging there.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:20 pm

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Its an insult to those that have pulled on a Pools shirt.

Mr.Parmo is here with me and he thinks the same....It should be a portrait of a Pools player like Kenny Johnson, Fogarty, Paul Staff or even Humphreys!!!! :shock:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:26 pm

Hodcroft has well and truly tied HIS colours to the mast!!!! :evil:

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 5:42 pm

Agree why was it not a poolie legend to open the suite or more so Mrs Harold Hornsey.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 6:28 pm

Disgusted!!!! Mr.Mutley, Hartlepool!!!! :evil:

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

When I found this out, I too had a foul mouthed rant.

I am not happy about it.

Anyone but Shearer.

We've had more links with Darlow than Scumcastle. Would we have a portrait of Craig Liddle on the wall as well? NO.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 6:48 pm

Exactly!!!! :evil:

Do the likes of Colchester have a portrait of Paul Mariner on their wall????

I very much doubt it!!!! :evil:

monkeehanger · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 7:07 pm

Unbelievable!!!

What an insult to all of the people who have served Pools over the last 100 years!

:evil:

Hangem · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 7:37 pm

Glad someone has brought this up. Totally agree with you lot and I can't seem to see the reason behind it.

refred

JohnnyMars · **Joined:** Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:24 am **Posts:** 2471

I agree with Chip Fireball - if the relationship between us and Newcastle Utd is so good why don't they help us out with a few loan players?

It just seems that Hodcroft wants to pay homage to Shearer and his ex-club. We are becoming the Tony Blair to their George W Bush refred

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

the only one loan i could think of was harper

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 8:23 pm

EMBARRASSING - DISGUSTING - SHAMEFUL. I AM FUMING ABOUT THIS.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22655

I would support Darlington before Newcastle. No irony intended. Seriously I detest those patronising nonentities and Ken Hodcroft has dropped 1000% in my estimation.

Being a mackem, I can't imagine Mark Simpson is over the moon either.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22655

I would support Darlington before Newcastle. No irony intended. Seriously I detest those patronising nonentities and Ken Hodcroft has dropped 1000% in my estimation.

Being a mackem, I can't imagine Mark Simpson is over the moon either.

no6bus · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm **Posts:** 5095

gremmlin wrote:

the only one loan i could think of was harper

so you didnt read the coppinger thread then :roll:

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 8:58 pm

Mr I wrote:

I would support Darlington before Newcastle. No irony intended. Seriously I detest those patronising nonentities and Ken Hodcroft has dropped 1000% in my estimation.

Being a mackem, I can't imagine Mark Simpson is over the moon either.

You can support who you like. Who you support is not relevant, especially if you could even mention the words support and Darlington in the same sentence.
This was not Hodcroft's idea. The portrait of Shearer was gifted to the club by Jack Nixon and Hodcroft, being the polite gentleman that he is, accepted it. At this moment in time it is hanging in the Centenary Lounge as a mark of respect to the man who donated it. It may not always hang there.
I suppose that Hodcroft could have spit in the old boy's face and burnt the portrait. Jack Nixon is an adopted Poolie and what he did was with the best intentions and a gift to the club.
Nothing more and nothing less.
However we musn't let stupid prejudices, hatred and lack of respect get in the way of a well intentioned gift. :roll:

katcha · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:00 pm

whatever it is it is a bit of pr for the club and you never know he might have an eye on the managers chair after all

Obafemi Obsession · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:11 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

Disgusted!!!! Mr.Mutley, Hartlepool!!!! :evil:

I had to check the date to see if it was April 1. Can't understand what a picture of Shearer has to do with Pools. Maybe the Bunkerites should write to the Mail to offer their thoughts? rage

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:18 pm

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You can support who you like. Who you support is not relevant, especially if you could even mention the words support and Darlington in the same sentence.
This was not Hodcroft's idea. The portrait of Shearer was gifted to the club by Jack Nixon and Hodcroft, being the polite gentleman that he is, accepted it. At this moment in time it is hanging in the Centenary Lounge as a mark of respect to the man who donated it. It may not always hang there.
I suppose that Hodcroft could have spit in the old boy's face and burnt the portrait. Jack Nixon is an adopted Poolie and what he did was with the best intentions and a gift to the club.
Nothing more and nothing less.
However we musn't let stupid prejudices, hatred and lack of respect get in the way of a well intentioned gift. :roll:

If it was a gift to the club....ie.Pools....why didn't he paint a picture of a Pools player????

Or why didn't he give the picture to Newcastle????

Mr.Hodcroft could have took the picture home and hung it above his bed!!!! :evil:

It has no relevance to Pools....at all!!!! :evil:

There is no reason on this earth why a painting of a player who has no association with this club should be hanging on OUR clubs wall so please don't try and justify it!!!! :roll:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm

Obafemi Obsession wrote:

I had to check the date to see if it was April 1. Can't understand what a picture of Shearer has to do with Pools. Maybe the Bunkerites should write to the Mail to offer their thoughts? rage

My last letter never got published so unless I change my name to Jim 'Fecking Nuclear' Allan I can't see why a letter about Pools will get published!!!! :evil:

threepintwonder · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:35 pm

it's not right it should have been opened by our local mp who has done so much for the people of our town,he fought tooth and nail to get our hospital closed,single handedly(cause nobody wanted the loser involved)got the post offices closed,and lined his self up with a cushy little number as a junior minister,so nobody has done more in his self interest as our yes man mp,and he must be gutted not to open it

katcha · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:38 pm

threepintwonder wrote:

it's not right it should have been opened by our local mp who has done so much for the people of our town,he fought tooth and nail to get our hospital closed,single handedly(cause nobody wanted the loser involved)got the post offices closed,and lined his self up with a cushy little number as a junior minister,so nobody has done more in his self interest as our yes man mp,and he must be gutted not to open it

As you can see by his track record he cannot open things he just closes them

threepintwonder · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:44 pm

katcha wrote:

threepintwonder wrote:

it's not right it should have been opened by our local mp who has done so much for the people of our town,he fought tooth and nail to get our hospital closed,single handedly(cause nobody wanted the loser involved)got the post offices closed,and lined his self up with a cushy little number as a junior minister,so nobody has done more in his self interest as our yes man mp,and he must be gutted not to open it

As you can see by his track record he cannot open things he just closes them

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:46 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You can support who you like. Who you support is not relevant, especially if you could even mention the words support and Darlington in the same sentence.
This was not Hodcroft's idea. The portrait of Shearer was gifted to the club by Jack Nixon and Hodcroft, being the polite gentleman that he is, accepted it. At this moment in time it is hanging in the Centenary Lounge as a mark of respect to the man who donated it. It may not always hang there.
I suppose that Hodcroft could have spit in the old boy's face and burnt the portrait. Jack Nixon is an adopted Poolie and what he did was with the best intentions and a gift to the club.
Nothing more and nothing less.
However we musn't let stupid prejudices, hatred and lack of respect get in the way of a well intentioned gift. :roll:

If it was a gift to the club....ie.Pools....why didn't he paint a picture of a Pools player????

Or why didn't he give the picture to Newcastle????

Mr.Hodcroft could have took the picture home and hung it above his bed!!!! :evil:

It has no relevance to Pools....at all!!!! :evil:

There is no reason on this earth why a painting of a player who has no association with this club should be hanging on OUR clubs wall so please don't try and justify it!!!! :roll:

I am not trying to justify it. I am trying to tell you why Hodcroft accepted it. It was not as if Hodcroft had commissioned the portrait was it? Jack Nixon turned up with a portrait of the man he had discovered and preferred to give that portrait to Pools. That was HIS choice. If Nixon hadn't turned up with the portrait then Hodcroft wouldn't have been put in the position he was. Think about that for a minute. The portrait was donated to the club and not to Hoddy personally, which would explain why he hasn't hung it above his bed.
If you are so bothered about the 'history' of why the portrait ended up at Pools why don't you go down to the club and ask them personally. You are jumping up and down ( as usual ) and jumping to conclusions ( as usual ) over something you have not bothered to research ( as usual ).
Have you never received a gift that you might not have appreciated but, in the interests of being polite, have appeared to be over the moon with? Have you never considered that may be the case here? Or would you rather just dive in?
Sometimes, Mutters, the answer is quite some way from the end of your nose. Have another look. :wink:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 9:57 pm

TickhillPoolie wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You can support who you like. Who you support is not relevant, especially if you could even mention the words support and Darlington in the same sentence.
This was not Hodcroft's idea. The portrait of Shearer was gifted to the club by Jack Nixon and Hodcroft, being the polite gentleman that he is, accepted it. At this moment in time it is hanging in the Centenary Lounge as a mark of respect to the man who donated it. It may not always hang there.
I suppose that Hodcroft could have spit in the old boy's face and burnt the portrait. Jack Nixon is an adopted Poolie and what he did was with the best intentions and a gift to the club.
Nothing more and nothing less.
However we musn't let stupid prejudices, hatred and lack of respect get in the way of a well intentioned gift. :roll:

If it was a gift to the club....ie.Pools....why didn't he paint a picture of a Pools player????

Or why didn't he give the picture to Newcastle????

Mr.Hodcroft could have took the picture home and hung it above his bed!!!! :evil:

It has no relevance to Pools....at all!!!! :evil:

There is no reason on this earth why a painting of a player who has no association with this club should be hanging on OUR clubs wall so please don't try and justify it!!!! :roll:

I am not trying to justify it. I am trying to tell you why Hodcroft accepted it. It was not as if Hodcroft had commissioned the portrait was it? Jack Nixon turned up with a portrait of the man he had discovered and preferred to give that portrait to Pools. That was HIS choice. If Nixon hadn't turned up with the portrait then Hodcroft wouldn't have been put in the position he was. Think about that for a minute. The portrait was donated to the club and not to Hoddy personally, which would explain why he hasn't hung it above his bed.
If you are so bothered about the 'history' of why the portrait ended up at Pools why don't you go down to the club and ask them personally. You are jumping up and down ( as usual ) and jumping to conclusions ( as usual ) over something you have not bothered to research ( as usual ).
Have you never received a gift that you might not have appreciated but, in the interests of being polite, have appeared to be over the moon with? Have you never considered that may be the case here? Or would you rather just dive in?
Sometimes, Mutters, the answer is quite some way from the end of your nose. Have another look. :wink:

Two words to you Watty....

As Usual!!!! :laugh:

Why would I want to research why a portrait of a player who hasn't any ties with Pools whatsoever is hanging up in Hartlepool United's Centenary Bar????

It's wrong and it shouldn't be there and i think you are on your own on this one Watty!!!! confised

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:06 pm

You've got my name wrong, Muttley. You already know my name is Frank. Do you really need to make cheap shots?
As for being on my own.........I don't think so. :wink:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:09 pm

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You've got my name wrong, Muttley. You already know my name is Frank. Do you really need to make cheap shots?
As for being on my own.........I don't think so. :wink:

Give over....you're old enough to know better!!!! :roll:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37230

MutleyRules wrote:

Honestly....I'm fecking bouncing about it!!!! rage

I wonder what Mr.Snowy has to say about it????

I think they are trying to justify it by saying that we played Newcastle in the first football match at the Vic....but what the feck has that got to with that whinging kunt who will never ever be Manager of Pools!!!!

:evil:

I was sat in the engine room office this morning when I first came into work and was reading the Echo and was totally gobsmacked, thinking is it just me who thinks this is complete and utter bollox...? I mean why St Alan, don't we have enough Poolie legends capable of performing the task instead?
The very idea of Shearers face beaming down like some footballing Kim il Sung on the assembled humble Poolies is enough to make you vomit...what about a painting of some worthy poolie legend, or doesn't that attract the same media response or impress the more gullible Poolls supporters who are are only to ready to recognise their 'betters'...... :roll:

I DON'T KNOW WHO THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO IMPRESS, BUT IT'S GOT THE CLOSE SEASON OFF TO A CRAP START FOR ME... a marketing bollock has been well and truly dropped and a lot of Pools fans patronised. :evil:

Do you reckon Newcastle would put a picture of any pools player in pride of place if I commisioned a painting.... so how about showing us some respect and not offering the thing to us in the fIrst place, THAT'S THE PART THAT MAKES ME ANNOYED, the idea we'd actually be happy to be patronised and they can't see it as such :roll:

BillinghamPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:19 pm

A minor point, the chap who donated the painting is called Jack Hixon, the scout who discovered Shearer. So I can understand his pride in it, and as he almost certainly knows of KH's interest in the Barcodes, can appreciate why he gave it. It will be gone from the walls of the suite before the new season begins, as I believe that KH is intelligent enough to know it will not go down well with the average supporter. If I am wrong, and he doesn't, he will certainly be made aware of it by most visitors to the room, if he happens to be around at the time.

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:21 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You've got my name wrong, Muttley. You already know my name is Frank. Do you really need to make cheap shots?
As for being on my own.........I don't think so. :wink:

Give over....you're old enough to know better!!!! :roll:

You are right I am, but your tedious insistance that I am your superhero, this Watty fellow, is getting a bit stale. Whereas I would love to boost your Hercule Poirot image I am afraid I have to disappoint you on this one. Mr I has cleared me on this board and has messaged me stating that he does not consider me to be the fellow to whom you allude. If I said ' stick to the point'.......would that make sense to you?
Sticking to the theme..........if you are so disillusioned as to why the portrait events took the path they did, then why not ask the club. Then you can come on here and enlighten us as to why the chain of events took the course they did. therethere

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:23 pm

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

A minor point, the chap who donated the painting is called Jack Hixon, the scout who discovered Shearer. So I can understand his pride in it, and as he almost certainly knows of KH's interest in the Barcodes, can appreciate why he gave it. It will be gone from the walls of the suite before the new season begins, as I believe that KH is intelligent enough to know it will not go down well with the average supporter. If I am wrong, and he doesn't, he will certainly be made aware of it by most visitors to the room, if he happens to be around at the time.

Precisely.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37230

If the club put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall you'd see the positive side of it..... :roll:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:25 pm

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You are right I am, but your tedious insistance that I am your superhero, this Watty fellow, is getting a bit stale. Whereas I would love to boost your Hercule Poirot image I am afraid I have to disappoint you on this one. Mr I has cleared me on this board and has messaged me stating that he does not consider me to be the fellow to whom you allude. If I said ' stick to the point'.......would that make sense to you?
Sticking to the theme..........if you are so disillusioned as to why the portrait events took the path they did, then why not ask the club. Then you can come on here and enlighten us as to why the chain of events took the course they did. therethere

I'm not really Mutley you know....that dog off the cartoons....honestly I'm not!!!! :roll:

yloop · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:25 pm

Snowy wrote:

If the club put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall you'd see the positive side of it..... :roll:

He'd probably get player of the century

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37230

With his 'management' record you wouldn't argue with him :laugh:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:29 pm

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

A minor point, the chap who donated the painting is called Jack Hixon, the scout who discovered Shearer. So I can understand his pride in it, and as he almost certainly knows of KH's interest in the Barcodes, can appreciate why he gave it. It will be gone from the walls of the suite before the new season begins, as I believe that KH is intelligent enough to know it will not go down well with the average supporter. If I am wrong, and he doesn't, he will certainly be made aware of it by most visitors to the room, if he happens to be around at the time.

So why didn't he donate it to Newcastle United????

Surely they are the obvious recipient of a picture of one of THEIR legends!!!! :roll:

I just don't think this bloke sat down one day and said to himself....

'I think I'll paint a picture of Alan Shearer and give it to Hartlepool United'!!!! :roll:

He might aswell have painted a picture of Barnsley Town Hall for all the relevance of it!!!! :roll:

I think for some strange reason that picture has been commisioned because I can't see any other reason why he would give it to Pools....none whatsoever!!!! confised

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:29 pm

Snowy wrote:

If the club put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall you'd see the positive side of it..... :roll:

I don't know who you mean by 'you', but if you mean me then no I wouldn't. What I would do however is to take the trouble to find out why the club had put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall, if I was interested that is.
I find that to be a more intelligent way of proceeding, rather than just spouting off like...........well the likes of you. :wink:

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:33 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

A minor point, the chap who donated the painting is called Jack Hixon, the scout who discovered Shearer. So I can understand his pride in it, and as he almost certainly knows of KH's interest in the Barcodes, can appreciate why he gave it. It will be gone from the walls of the suite before the new season begins, as I believe that KH is intelligent enough to know it will not go down well with the average supporter. If I am wrong, and he doesn't, he will certainly be made aware of it by most visitors to the room, if he happens to be around at the time.

So why didn't he donate it to Newcastle United????

Surely they are the obvious recipient of a picture of one of THEIR legends!!!! :roll:

I just don't think this bloke sat down one day and said to himself....

'I think I'll paint a picture of Alan Shearer and give it to Hartlepool United'!!!! :roll:

He might aswell have painted a picture of Barnsley Town Hall for all the relevance of it!!!! :roll:

I think for some strange reason that picture has been commisioned because I can't see any other reason why he would give it to Pools....none whatsoever!!!! confised

Ah Muttley, you are now listening to my advice. Of course it was commissioned. The burning question is by whom was it commissioned. When you dig a bit deeper you will find it was not commissioned by Pools or Hodcroft. Keep going...you're getting there.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37230

TickhillPoolie wrote:

Snowy wrote:

If the club put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall you'd see the positive side of it..... :roll:

I don't know who you mean by 'you', but if you mean me then no I wouldn't. What I would do however is to take the trouble to find out why the club had put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall, if I was interested that is.
I find that to be a more intelligent way of proceeding, rather than just spouting off like...........well the likes of you. :wink:

Better than giving us all your 'view' as though you're adressing a public meeting...Pol Pot didn't play footy either. :roll:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37230

TickhillPoolie wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

BillinghamPoolie wrote:

A minor point, the chap who donated the painting is called Jack Hixon, the scout who discovered Shearer. So I can understand his pride in it, and as he almost certainly knows of KH's interest in the Barcodes, can appreciate why he gave it. It will be gone from the walls of the suite before the new season begins, as I believe that KH is intelligent enough to know it will not go down well with the average supporter. If I am wrong, and he doesn't, he will certainly be made aware of it by most visitors to the room, if he happens to be around at the time.

So why didn't he donate it to Newcastle United????

Surely they are the obvious recipient of a picture of one of THEIR legends!!!! :roll:

I just don't think this bloke sat down one day and said to himself....

'I think I'll paint a picture of Alan Shearer and give it to Hartlepool United'!!!! :roll:

He might aswell have painted a picture of Barnsley Town Hall for all the relevance of it!!!! :roll:

I think for some strange reason that picture has been commisioned because I can't see any other reason why he would give it to Pools....none whatsoever!!!! confised

Ah Muttley, you are now listening to my advice. Of course it was commissioned. The burning question is by whom was it commissioned. When you dig a bit deeper you will find it was not commissioned by Pools or Hodcroft. Keep going...you're getting there.

That reply was vintage Watty....funny how it slips out.

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:37 pm

MutleyRules wrote:

TickhillPoolie wrote:

You are right I am, but your tedious insistance that I am your superhero, this Watty fellow, is getting a bit stale. Whereas I would love to boost your Hercule Poirot image I am afraid I have to disappoint you on this one. Mr I has cleared me on this board and has messaged me stating that he does not consider me to be the fellow to whom you allude. If I said ' stick to the point'.......would that make sense to you?
Sticking to the theme..........if you are so disillusioned as to why the portrait events took the path they did, then why not ask the club. Then you can come on here and enlighten us as to why the chain of events took the course they did. therethere

I'm not really Mutley you know....that dog off the cartoons....honestly I'm not!!!! :roll:

Really..............well what dya know.

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 10:45 pm

Snowy wrote:

TickhillPoolie wrote:

Snowy wrote:

If the club put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall you'd see the positive side of it..... :roll:

I don't know who you mean by 'you', but if you mean me then no I wouldn't. What I would do however is to take the trouble to find out why the club had put a picture of Pol Pot on the wall, if I was interested that is.
I find that to be a more intelligent way of proceeding, rather than just spouting off like...........well the likes of you. :wink:

Better than giving us all your 'view' as though you're adressing a public meeting...Pol Pot didn't play footy either. :roll:

I didn't know there was a rule on how to post. I post as I see fit...........as I assume you do.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sat May 17, 2008 11:11 pm

I don't give a flying fuck about what the reasons behind this were. Get it the fuck out of there first thing tomorrow. I am insulted by this, and don't give a toss if anyone else thinks it's been done for a valid reason. They can go and drink my boiling piss.

TickhillPoolie · **Posted:** Sun May 18, 2008 12:26 am

parmopooly wrote:

I don't give a flying f*** about what the reasons behind this were. Get it the f*** out of there first thing tomorrow. I am insulted by this, and don't give a toss if anyone else thinks it's been done for a valid reason. They can go and drink my boiling piss.

Well if you don't give a toss about other people's opinion then there doesn't appear to be a valid reason to take notice of yours. I'll take a rain check on your offer of a drink, no offence of course.

Are We Hartlepool Or Newcastle United????

Gadgies online