Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 7:42 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Looking at the ground, I'm not sure where the extension could come from except upwards or knock down the bowling centre.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:18 pm 
We have loads of room for expansion on three of the four sides of the ground. The only stand that couldn't get much bigger is the Town End but there's even room for that to be higher with the concourse area at the back being enclosed under the stand.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
The mill house could be extended backwards as well as at both ends, or else rebuilt to fill in the available area. You could easily double its capacity.
The rink end could expand upwards and backwards into the car park.
A 12k ground would be a doddle provided we didn't take out any standing capacity.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:26 pm 
how artistic is that photo?!
love the way those little emblems have been added, really fills me with a great sense of happiness looking at it :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm
Posts: 3115
Wasn't there talk a couple of years back about filling in the corners? There's a big space between the Town End & the Mill House stands. Also a large space at the other end of the Mill House, although the Corner Flag is there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
that red car could do with a clean

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Salty wrote:
how artistic is that photo?!
love the way those little emblems have been added, really fills me with a great sense of happiness looking at it :wink:


rolfl rolfl rolfl rolfl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:31 am
Posts: 2885
Location: The South
The problem with filling in corners is corners are bloody expensive! they also don't tend to hold too many people.

Remember the riverside was built missing two corners to start with.

I've always thought that when the CK was built they said the top could be taken off and another level stuck on it, I'm sure the foundations were built to take that stand being doubled in size. IOR have already done a lot of work on the corporate hospitality in that stand, the buildings out the back have doubled in the last couple of years, I don't know whether that will impact on the possibility of building upwards.

The away end looks a piece of piss to build on, but there are two concerns, the first being do we still have to pay back the grant we got to seat it, and the second being if the police insist on it being for away fans only, whats the point in making it any bigger, it's hardly been filled on a weekly basis is it?

_________________
The moon is made of cheese, FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
ptbap wrote:
The problem with filling in corners is corners are bloody expensive! they also don't tend to hold too many people.

No need to fill them in Mr Proud; just taking the stands to the end of the playing surface would be a start.
As for designated away end/home end, etc., I'm sure the people concerned could get together and agree on a new configuration to fit the bill.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:28 pm 
ptbap wrote:

The away end looks a piece of piss to build on, but there are two concerns, the first being do we still have to pay back the grant we got to seat it, and the second being if the police insist on it being for away fans only, whats the point in making it any bigger, it's hardly been filled on a weekly basis is it?


Loads of clubs get away with one of those piddly net things to cordon off away fans I don't see why Cleveland police wouldn't allow us to do that. I mean they let the Boro get away with it. I'm totally sure we'd be treated equally as we always have been in the past, I'm sure had we opened the Vic like the Borer did the Riverside without a proper access road we'd have been given equally as much leeway.

Oh shit my sarcasm alarm is smoking again.....


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 3141
Salty wrote:
how artistic is that photo?!
love the way those little emblems have been added, really fills me with a great sense of happiness looking at it :wink:

hey careful the paint is still wet

_________________
Image
innocent of all charges and still no evidence
it is easy to accuse when you dont have to prove


go back to your drum and your anti depressants yes you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Nobodys Hero wrote:
The rink end could be much bigger. Infact I reckon we could comfortably have a 3k capacity seated stand there.

The Mill House side is the stand that really needs work doing to it.

It just embarrassing now.

If the lot was demolished, and the ground levelled.....to pitch level..................a simple one tier stand could go there...........without taking up any further space behind the stand.......and could easily hold 6000.

And it wouldnt be THAT expensive either.

That should do it. I reckon that would give us the 12k ground that is all we would ever need.


Fk Off.

I like standing there.

Leave my terrace alone. :evil:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
We definitely need a bigger away end, next season we could possibly have Sheff Wed, Leeds, Notts Forest, Carlisle and Donny who would all sell their allocation out several times over. I would have included Darlo there if they come out but we know how they struggle to sell their current allocation never mind a bigger one.

I bet there's anywhere between 10-15k lost in crowds by not being able to house all those clubs supporters which would cost the club around 250k in just one season. Surely a bigger Rink End would be a good investment over the next few years?

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
Give the away fans the town end with its crap acoustics and get us lot back in the Rink End, our spiritual home.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
MadJohn wrote:
Neither Forest nor Donny filled the current Rink End on their last visit but I still agree, though I wouldn't go overboard. Maybe have a 2000 away section in 12000 ground, but allow it to expand up to 2500-3000 if needed. We don't need a 9000 home capacity, and won't need it on a regular basis any time soon.


I appreciate they didn't fill it last time, I meant they could potentially fill it several times over next season if we got them first game of the season, Boxing Day or last game etc.

The away end was the perfect size for League Two but potential away supports are far far greater in League One.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:26 am 
Mr I wrote:
Give the away fans the town end with its crap acoustics and get us lot back in the Rink End, our spiritual home.


Hear Hear.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
Nobodys Hero wrote:
If the lot was demolished, and the ground levelled.....to pitch level..................a simple one tier stand could go there...........without taking up any further space behind the stand.......and could easily hold 6000.


I'm not so sure we could get a 6k stand in to replace the Mill House. It would need to be pretty high and pretty steep to keep it within the current area. I'm sure the capacity of Darlo's main stand was something like 3.5k and they seemed to have had more space than we have with the Mill House.

A 6k stand would dwarf the rest of the ground!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
MadJohn wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Leave my terrace alone. :evil:

And mine :evil:

I would hate it if any future development was at the expense of terracing.


Isn't there a requirement for clubs in the Championship to have no terracing after 5 years or something?

If our ambitions are for the Championship, you'll have to let go :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:31 am
Posts: 2885
Location: The South
Crewe, £6m, 7000 seats, one side of the ground

http://www.footballgroundguide.com/crew ... ck%20Stand

Agree about it dwarfing the rest of the stadium, apparently Crewe's accounts for 70% of the grounds capacity. But, So what? The huge thingy Newcastle have dwarfs the other two sides of there ground.



silaird wrote:
Nobodys Hero wrote:
If the lot was demolished, and the ground levelled.....to pitch level..................a simple one tier stand could go there...........without taking up any further space behind the stand.......and could easily hold 6000.


I'm not so sure we could get a 6k stand in to replace the Mill House. It would need to be pretty high and pretty steep to keep it within the current area. I'm sure the capacity of Darlo's main stand was something like 3.5k and they seemed to have had more space than we have with the Mill House.

A 6k stand would dwarf the rest of the ground!

_________________
The moon is made of cheese, FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
silaird wrote:
A 6k stand would dwarf the rest of the ground!


The nearside stand in this photo holds 4000 seated and is barely half the length of the pitch.

Image

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
You think this stand has a capacity of 4,000?

Image

Half that figure and you'll be correct!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
ptbap wrote:
Crewe, £6m, 7000 seats, one side of the ground

http://www.footballgroundguide.com/crew ... ck%20Stand

Agree about it dwarfing the rest of the stadium, apparently Crewe's accounts for 70% of the grounds capacity. But, So what? The huge thingy Newcastle have dwarfs the other two sides of there ground.


My doubts as to whether we could have such a stand is due to the limited land available to us within the ground. It would need one hell of a rake on it to get a capacity of 6k. That stand at Crewe looks to cover more land than we have available.

That picture certainly gives an idea of how the rest of the ground would look but I'm not saying that's a reason not to do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
How about this one then with 5696 capacity.

It might look disproportionate in the photo but inside the ground it doesn't really seem out of the ordinary. And it's along the narrow side of the ground; along the long side it wouldn't need to be so high.

Image

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
The point I'm making is do we have the space to be able to build such a stand. I'm not saying I don't want one!

Google maps may tell us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
silaird wrote:
Google maps may tell us.

The Google map is in the first post in this thread! :laugh: :laugh:

There is room to double the width of the seated part of the MH stand without even encroaching on that little car parking space, and the stand does not run the full length of the pitch.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:01 pm
Posts: 2038
Location: Leeds
The Cheadle End at Stockport County holds 5,250 - and that's at the narrow end too, like Prenton


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:31 am
Posts: 2885
Location: The South
Aye does look canny big like, might fit....

Image


silaird wrote:
My doubts as to whether we could have such a stand is due to the limited land available to us within the ground. It would need one hell of a rake on it to get a capacity of 6k. That stand at Crewe looks to cover more land than we have available.

That picture certainly gives an idea of how the rest of the ground would look but I'm not saying that's a reason not to do it.

_________________
The moon is made of cheese, FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
Richard M. Head wrote:
silaird wrote:
Google maps may tell us.

The Google map is in the first post in this thread! :laugh: :laugh:

There is room to double the width of the seated part of the MH stand without even encroaching on that little car parking space, and the stand does not run the full length of the pitch.


I didn't mean a map of Victoria Park! I meant maps of Gresty Road and Prenton Park!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:50 pm 
Nobodys Hero wrote:
The Mill House side is the stand that really needs work doing to it.

It just embarrassing now..


So:

The team, the manager, the Millhouse stand, the season tickets, the grub, the stewards, the ale, replica kit, the ticket office and the programme are all on your shit list. sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

So what's left?? :uhoh: :uhoh: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:54 pm 
Pooliekev wrote:
Nobodys Hero wrote:
The Mill House side is the stand that really needs work doing to it.

It just embarrassing now..


So:

The team, the manager, the Millhouse stand, the season tickets, the grub, the stewards, the ale, replica kit, the ticket office and the programme are all on your shiit list. sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

So what's left?? :uhoh: :uhoh: :grin:

Kev...you missed out 'people who don't attend matches'. :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
silaird wrote:
I didn't mean a map of Victoria Park! I meant maps of Gresty Road and Prenton Park!

The Prenton Kop is 100 feet deep according to the scale on the map.
The available total width of the Mill house side without trashing the parking places is .... 100 feet!
And there's the extra length. The Kop is 200 feet long, the MH is 250 without even extending the ends.

As long as we left the terracing I think you'd get your 6000 in. Bring on the big boys. :sweeeet:

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:33 pm
Posts: 25
If that's the case, let's get it on!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:31 am
Posts: 2885
Location: The South
I have a question, who's going to sit in this new stand?

_________________
The moon is made of cheese, FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
ptbap wrote:
I have a question, who's going to sit in this new stand?

Dibbs and a couple of others that size should just about fill it. :laugh: :laugh:

But seriously, its going to be full of Stoke City, Sheffield United, Wolves, Borer, Derby, etc., supporters and all the new Pools supporters come to see the big teams, innit? I presume the only reason to expand it would be if we were playing in the Champo.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:51 pm 
ptbap wrote:
I have a question, who's going to sit in this new stand?


Everyone.

If you stand up you get chucked out, filmed and arrested later or risk the club a fine. For some strange reason... :roll: :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
ElvisAintDead wrote:
The plans I saw, with my own eyes nearly 2 years ago, were VERY similar to the Kop at Tranmere. It went back into the Rink End car-park by about 20ft, we only lost one line of Car spaces. It had shops and a concourse underneath, as well as the Main Entrance for the club.


4500 seats
3 sections of 1500

away end

1 section (1500) for cat c - torquay darlo
2 sections (3000) for cat b - donny the like
3 sections (4500) for cat c - teams with lots and lots of away fans that want to come

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
katcha wrote:
3 sections (4500) for cat c - Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool

Just corrected that for you :grin:

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 417
Location: Dodge City
Perhaps whilst developing stands etc some thought may be given to a PROPER disabled enclosure with perhaps some shelter from the elements and a decent view!
Just wondered, like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:34 am 
Pooliekev wrote:
Nobodys Hero wrote:
The Mill House side is the stand that really needs work doing to it.

It just embarrassing now..


So:

The team, the manager, the Millhouse stand, the season tickets, the grub, the stewards, the ale, replica kit, the ticket office and the programme are all on your shiit list. sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead

So what's left?? :uhoh: :uhoh: :grin:


This is exactly the point some of us are making!

The real club has now moved to the message boards and to Monkey Bizz


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
You know what would be good, knock down that empty plot of Jackson's Landings and build a new ground.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:37 pm
Posts: 104
Mr I wrote:
You know what would be good, knock down that empty plot of Jackson's Landings and build a new ground.


As good an idea as it sounds, that site just isn't wide enough at the present time


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22649
You're right, its only 90 metres across. Shame that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:37 pm
Posts: 104
I'm not sure who owns the land on 'Greenland Road' - opposite side to Heerema but there is a shit load of space, obviously it would need levelling out etc but its a good size


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Redevelopment of Victoria Park
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:37 pm
Posts: 104
Cornelius Atweasle wrote:
mreeve85 wrote:
obviously it would need levelling out etc


Do you think so? rolfl


I know so


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: bobby lemonade, charltonclive, congress_tart, Cooperdog, Davcla, Essex poolie, Graham Robson, JohnnyMars, Mctee1908, millhouseseats, Ozzy Saltburn, pollyo, Pooliebod, Pools-on-trent, Pooly_Imp, Sandman, Sedgefield Poolie, stupoolie, Sussex UK, tatty picker and 232 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.