Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:10 pm 
If Godwin Antwi was released by Liverpool at the end of this season would you want Pools to sign him?

*Puts on crash helmet*

I would :shock:

He is 19 years old and has all the attributes to be very good at football, he's big, strong, quick, and a tremendous athlete. He has quite a few things he needs to iron out (such as giving the impression he's been on space cake during some games) granted but I'd be prepared to be more forgiving if he was one of our own. It appears he's also a tremendous lad and a very good professional. He should never have been thrown in as our first choice centre back at the start of this season that in my opinion has been one of Danny's biggest mistakes this season but that wasn't his fault.

I think he has the potential to get quite a lot better.

Does anyone else agree or is it just me!?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:16 pm 
We might not get the chance.

Liverpool signed him very young and then lent him to Accrington and us.

They obviously see something and as we do, sent him out to get battered in lesser company. I've no doubt someone from Liverpool watches him regularly and sees how he's coming along. If however that scout or Rafa Benitez reads this board, well, they're going to think that Richie Barker is shit.

Anyway, never seen him so I dunno. :grin: :grin:

Hope that helps. :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22641
Good question.................. hmmm...

Well he's certainly never going to make it at Liverpool's level so he needs to be thinking about his future. As you say, he's only 19 and should get better with time and experience. It might not be such a bad call.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
Pooliekev wrote:
If however that scout or Rafa Benitez reads this board, well, they're going to think that Richie Barker is shiit.



He is! sctatchinghead

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
would sign him in a heartbeat. massive potential that could be nurtured playing alongside collins and clark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Posts: 12708
Location: Back of the net
aido87 wrote:
would sign him in a heartbeat. massive potential that could be nurtured playing alongside collins and clark.


Gotta agree with Aido (probably for the first and only time). He makes mistakes but often has the pace to dig himself out of the sh*t. A player with his pace would be an asset IMO especially in the long run after we have 'learnt' him a few things.

_________________
“Jonathan had two days with us and decided to retire from football."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37200
We all appear to be getting a bit misty eyed as the season ends with a whimper and kidding ourselves to boot. He hasn't been very good and the money involved could be put to better use, football is a business, not a last chance saloon, we've had enough of that over the years. Potential is as potential does.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
Snowy wrote:
Potential is as potential does.


riiiiight sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:03 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37200
...keep thinking, it'll come. :laugh:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
no mate, i understand it, just don't think it makes any sense whatsoever banghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:12 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37200
if you understand it, it must make sense. :wink: ... and the phrase is from a famous playwright to boot.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:16 pm 
There is absolutely no doubt that there is a raw talent here. The problem is that Antwi has not improved very much since his first game. In fact some people would argue that he has gone backwards since his first two or three games in a Pools shirt.
What intrigues me is the role that Butterworth plays in the development of young defenders. Butts was a very effective central defender in his playing days. No one would argue with that. He has been part of the England coaching set up, presumably coaching defenders.
There are a few basic rules of thumb when it comes to defending. One of the more popular of these rules is 'don't let the ball bounce'. Either Butterworth can't get this across to Antwi or Antwi can't see it.
If the kid can't master the basics then he has got major problems. Good luck to him.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
Snowy wrote:
if you understand it, it must make sense. :wink: ... and the phrase is from a famous playwright to boot.


no mate, i understand it but it makes no sense. :roll:

and what he fook do playwrights know about football ? sctatchinghead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:22 pm 
TickhillPoolie wrote:
There is absolutely no doubt that there is a raw talent here. The problem is that Antwi has not improved very much since his first game. In fact some people would argue that he has gone backwards since his first two or three games in a Pools shirt.
What intrigues me is the role that Butterworth plays in the development of young defenders. Butts was a very effective central defender in his playing days. No one would argue with that. He has been part of the England coaching set up, presumably coaching defenders.
There are a few basic rules of thumb when it comes to defending. One of the more popular of these rules is 'don't let the ball bounce'. Either Butterworth can't get this across to Antwi or Antwi can't see it.
If the kid can't master the basics then he has got major problems. Good luck to him.



Being part of the England coaching set-up is hardly nowt to write home about now is it? :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37200
aido87 wrote:
Snowy wrote:
if you understand it, it must make sense. :wink: ... and the phrase is from a famous playwright to boot.


no mate, i understand it but it makes no sense. :roll:

and what he fook do playwrights know about football ? sctatchinghead
...about as much as we do... :wink:

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:30 pm 
TalbotAvenger wrote:
TickhillPoolie wrote:
There is absolutely no doubt that there is a raw talent here. The problem is that Antwi has not improved very much since his first game. In fact some people would argue that he has gone backwards since his first two or three games in a Pools shirt.
What intrigues me is the role that Butterworth plays in the development of young defenders. Butts was a very effective central defender in his playing days. No one would argue with that. He has been part of the England coaching set up, presumably coaching defenders.
There are a few basic rules of thumb when it comes to defending. One of the more popular of these rules is 'don't let the ball bounce'. Either Butterworth can't get this across to Antwi or Antwi can't see it.
If the kid can't master the basics then he has got major problems. Good luck to him.



Being part of the England coaching set-up is hardly nowt to write home about now is it? :laugh:


Oh I don't know. I imagine hearing that England wanted you as a coach would excite you.............just a little bit. :wink: :laugh:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Am I really reading this thread? confised

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:03 pm 
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
Am I really reading this thread? confised



I don't know, are you?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
TalbotAvenger wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
Am I really reading this thread? confised



I don't know, are you?


I can't work out if I am hallucinating and reading that people are considering keeping Godwin Antwi and describing him as having raw talent and showing potential.

He's an abysmal liability and the further away he is from the first team the better.

If we were offered him for 50 quid a week I would still tell them to welcome to the board.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:13 pm 
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
TalbotAvenger wrote:
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
Am I really reading this thread? confised



I don't know, are you?


I can't work out if I am hallucinating and reading that people are considering keeping Godwin Antwi and describing him as having raw talent and showing potential.

He's an abysmal liability and the further away he is from the first team the better.

If we were offered him for 50 quid a week I would still tell them to welcome to the site..

To put it brutally........if Liverpool Football Club consider him to have raw talent and potential, then we are faced with a choice. Do we accept LFC's judgement or yours. That is one tough call. :roll:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
TickhillPoolie wrote:
To put it brutally........if Liverpool Football Club consider him to have raw talent and potential, then we are faced with a choice. Do we accept LFC's judgement or yours. That is one tough call. :roll:


WTF? This gets worse.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:33 pm 
I would rather have Glenn Davies than godlose antwi


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Posts: 5095
rumour has it he is already on his way to a belgium club next season for another season long loan

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:35 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
tickhill thats probably the worst argument i have read in months.

are you seriously suggesting every 17 year old liverpool sign goes on to be a successful professional footballer?

my mate stu brightwell was at man utd when he was 18. sharing a room with wes brown. he went via pools to playing alongside me in the tyneside business league within 5 short years of being at old trafford.

theres as much chance of the mayor playing for liverpool as antwi playing for them.

we dont really need a 4th choice centre half do we ?

What is the worst argument, Chip? You didn't define it.
Where did I say or suggest that every 17 year old Liverpool sign goes on to be a successful footballer?
I said or even I suggested that I prefer Liverpool's take on a footballer's potential to that of a message board punter.
After all Liverpool have recognised potential at a more than reasonable level to the likes of us.
Where did I suggest we need a fourth choice centre half?
I made a few observations, not opinions, chill out man.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:46 pm 
Tax Paying Poolie wrote:
TickhillPoolie wrote:
To put it brutally........if Liverpool Football Club consider him to have raw talent and potential, then we are faced with a choice. Do we accept LFC's judgement or yours. That is one tough call. :roll:


WTF? This gets worse.


What gets worse? The kid has got raw talent and potential. Liverpool obviously think so and so do others, including me. No one is saying he is the finished article, or even saying he will make it. If you think people are saying that then you are hallucinating ( your words not mine)
So you don't think he will make it? Fine. I prefer to take more notice of Liverpool than you, even though you may turn out to be right. That is my choice is it not?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:56 pm 
TickhillPoolie wrote:
chip fireball wrote:
tickhill thats probably the worst argument i have read in months.

are you seriously suggesting every 17 year old liverpool sign goes on to be a successful professional footballer?

my mate stu brightwell was at man utd when he was 18. sharing a room with wes brown. he went via pools to playing alongside me in the tyneside business league within 5 short years of being at old trafford.

theres as much chance of the mayor playing for liverpool as antwi playing for them.

we dont really need a 4th choice centre half do we ?

What is the worst argument, Chip? You didn't define it.
Where did I say or suggest that every 17 year old Liverpool sign goes on to be a successful footballer?
I said or even I suggested that I prefer Liverpool's take on a footballer's potential to that of a message board punter.
After all Liverpool have recognised potential at a more than reasonable level to the likes of us.
Where did I suggest we need a fourth choice centre half?
I made a few observations, not opinions, chill out man.


Would you be so kind as to point out, anywhere in this thread, where I suggest that we should sign Antwi permanently?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
christ ladies, don't be so intense. its about opinions, and mine is the one to believe in stpid

sign him and sign him now :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:40 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
tickhill, your conclusion is that we accept either the opinion of tax paying poolie or " liverpool football club. "

however the original question asked would you sign him if, hypothetically, you were the manager, and, hypothetically, you had the choice.

on the evidence of his own eyes tax has suggested it would be a waste of time signing him.

you then sarcastically ridicule him on the basis that at some point over 12 months ago liverpool felt he had some potential.

are you seriously suggesting that at this point he is a better player than nelson collins or clark ?

if not then are you suggesting we sign a 19 year old centre half as 4th choice behind those 3 even though he has shown himself to be a liability this season?

and that on the basis that liverpool think he has potential even though for all we know they may no longer think that?

if you are not prepared to answer the question then why knock folk with the bollocks to answer it?


we have greater needs in other positions.

imho.

Chip, If you are asking if I would sign him then the answer is no I wouldn't.

If you are asking whether I would take the opinion of LFC over a message board punter then the answer is LFC. I am not questioning the right of TPP to have an opinion on Antwi, but his 'hallucinating' comment suggested that others who might want Antwi to come were making him hallucinate. He was ridiculing other people's comments by that remark.
Your next comment doesn't apply to me as I have never suggested that we sign Antwi. Therefore it is obvious that I don't prefer him to Clark, Nelson or Collins.
There is no evidence that I have suggested we sign Antwi as any choice.
I don't know Liverpool's current opinion on Antwi so I can't answer the last bit.

So, to sum up.
1.I have never suggested Antwi would be a success.
2.I have never suggested that we should sign him.
3.I have never suggested he should be fourth choice.
4.I have never suggested he was better than Collins, Clark or Nelson.
But.
5.I have suggested that he has potential and a raw talent.
6.I have stated that if there is a choice between the opinion of LFC and a message board punter, then I prefer the opinion of LFC.

The only point you have a quarrel with is Point 6 , the rest you have made up to try and bolster your argument.

The other day MR I stated in his address to us all that sarcasm was acceptable. TPP was being sarcastic with his 'hallucination' and I returned the compliment. In my post, as a contribution to this thread, I gave straightforward observations. If you don't agree with those observations then that is your right. What is not your right, however, is to add things in which I have not said.
I meant no offence to TPP and I'm sure he meant none with his comments. You, on the other hand, decided to have a go. By all means have a go whenever you like, but try to do it a bit more factually.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:45 pm 
f uckin hell! I'M better than Godwin fookin Antwi and i'm fookin shite!!


Jesus h christ


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:53 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
do we really need 4 centre halves on top wages ?

one suspects the manager will have few funds in the kitty to patch up his threadbare squad given the poor attendances this season.

he may be raw, he may have potential, but you could say that about a lot of our own kids who arent on top whack.

why pay a lot of money on the off chance he might improve.

id spend money where it needs to be spent, especially if the flair players are away.


I agree with that. We have Liddle who can also fill in. Our Priorities lie elsewhere. I have heard that Liverpool have a mapped out plan for Antwi, but I don't know how true that is.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:22 pm 
Well at least I've created a talking point rolfl

I think Antwi has struggled but he clearly has potential.

He is certainly is not as bad as some people are making out. My whole point in this thread I think was that if Antwi was one of our own at the age of 19 we'd be far more forgiving and far more receptive to the opinion that he could turn out with patience into a good player.

God forbid what sort of pelters poor Matty Robson would have got had he ever been on loan to us from a Premiership club :shock:

When I said I'd sign him as well it wouldn't be to play in the first team from the start of the season, he'd to a squad player until he started to improve. In my opinion he's worth a gamble.

Can I also add that I'd rather see a young'un with hunger make up our squad than someone who 'has been' a good player and is already a millionaire like lets say for example Robbie Elliott.

This is all hypothetical of course :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:09 am 
TickhillPoolie wrote:
Chip, If you are asking if I would sign him then the answer is no I wouldn't.

If you are asking whether I would take the opinion of LFC over a message board punter then the answer is LFC. I am not questioning the right of TPP to have an opinion on Antwi, but his 'hallucinating' comment suggested that others who might want Antwi to come were making him hallucinate. He was ridiculing other people's comments by that remark.
Your next comment doesn't apply to me as I have never suggested that we sign Antwi. Therefore it is obvious that I don't prefer him to Clark, Nelson or Collins.
There is no evidence that I have suggested we sign Antwi as any choice.
I don't know Liverpool's current opinion on Antwi so I can't answer the last bit.

So, to sum up.
1.I have never suggested Antwi would be a success.
2.I have never suggested that we should sign him.
3.I have never suggested he should be fourth choice.
4.I have never suggested he was better than Collins, Clark or Nelson.
But.
5.I have suggested that he has potential and a raw talent.
6.I have stated that if there is a choice between the opinion of LFC and a message board punter, then I prefer the opinion of LFC.

The only point you have a quarrel with is Point 6 , the rest you have made up to try and bolster your argument.

The other day MR I stated in his address to us all that sarcasm was acceptable. TPP was being sarcastic with his 'hallucination' and I returned the compliment. In my post, as a contribution to this thread, I gave straightforward observations. If you don't agree with those observations then that is your right. What is not your right, however, is to add things in which I have not said.
I meant no offence to TPP and I'm sure he meant none with his comments. You, on the other hand, decided to have a go. By all means have a go whenever you like, but try to do it a bit more factually.


That was very well put Mr.Superwa....I mean Mr.Tickhill!!!! clappp clappp clappp clappp :wink: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:11 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 37200
The ONLY evidence I shall be going on, is that of my eyes, most of these signings start off well and quckly fade, which is what happened in this case, no thank you. NEXT!

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:20 am 
Snowy wrote:
The ONLY evidence I shall be going on, is that of my eyes, most of these signings start off well and quckly fade, which is what happened in this case, no thank you. NEXT!


I agree with that wholeheartedly, Snowy. I wouldn't sign him either, as I have previously stated.
PJ does have a point though and Liverpool obviously think he has got potential. I hope the kid does well but, in my humble opinion, he is a raw talent that doesn't seem to be improving. We have had quite a bit of raw talent at Pools, most of whom haven't improved either. Maybe it is our fault. Who knows?
On Dibbs point, it is a well known fact that of the thousands and thousands of young wannabees, only a few make it. Liverpool would be the last to claim that they get it right all of the time but they seem to think there is potential there and I, and others, are prepared to go along with that. Nobody is saying, including Liverpool, that he is the finished article, or that he ever will be. It is really pointless comparing him with other 'failures'. Remember he is only nineteen.
Mutley, I am flattered that you consider my knowledge of football is such that you compare me to Mr Superwa............ Mr I will tell you a different story. However if your life is enhanced by stating, perhaps with a satisfied, smug look, that you have solved the great mystery ( according to those who are obsessed by it) as to the identity of your hero, then I am really pleased that a little light has been brought into your life. :grin: :wink: :grin: ( A hopeless attempt at sarcasm :wink:please forgive me )
I think if Mr Superwa..........wanted to come on this board in order to disrupt it, he would make a far better job of it than I am supposed to be doing. violin violin violin


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:30 pm 
Its a no from me too, he hasnt made a big enough impression in the games hes played to warrant a full time contract (god forbid) evenif he were available for nowt.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:57 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
theres as much chance of the mayor playing for liverpool as antwi playing for them


Yeah but the mayor has a great chance of managing Liverpool! :laugh:

Image


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:26 pm
Posts: 5832
Location: number 8
Great question

But no.

Jesus I rather have benitez's double for manager and the dog at right back before that.

_________________
I have forgotten more than you will ever know


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hypothetical question;
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:19 pm 
Nobodys Hero wrote:
TickhillPoolie wrote:
[If you are asking whether I would take the opinion of LFC over a message board punter then the answer is LFC. .


Didnt a Liverpool manager(past) once tell us that we were signing a great player in David Clegg?

I think he was called Kelly Dalglish or something. :laugh:

On past form like that I think I would take the opinions of those daft scouse gets with a pinch of salt.



Cleggs career definitely spiralled last time i heard about him he was a funeral director.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: accrington fan, BarryHarris57, bobby lemonade, charltonclive, Flying Hogans, Gerry Mandrake, Infidel, itwontwork, JackVet, Jamie1952, JBPoolie, JohnnyMars, Kenny Bottles, Mctee1908, Mulvaney, MutleyRules, Ozzy Saltburn, paulus the woodgnome and a side salad, Sedgefield Poolie, Snowy, Stomper409, Sussex UK and 255 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.