Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:04 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:04 am
Posts: 1432
What the fu@k is he seeing in them two fooking keepers,

Can i say one thing WOODS ,BUTZ ,LEE-BARRET F@@K OFF bbolt bbolt bbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:13 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Somewhere between stupid and clever. It's a fine dividing line sometimes.
Kevin Dixon wrote:
What the fu@k is he seeing in them two fooking keepers,

Can i say one thing WOODS ,BUTZ ,LEE-BARRET welcome to the site. bbolt bbolt bbolt


It's Wood not Woods but his judgement (or his coaching) must be questioned.

_________________
There's no way Chuck Norris is harder than Stallone. Even if he did serve in 'Nam.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:04 am
Posts: 1432
F@@KING WOODS OR WOOD WHO GIVES A F@@K THATS MY LOT FOR THIS SEASON I HAVE SEEN ENOUGH AND HAD ENOUGH. :!:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:13 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Somewhere between stupid and clever. It's a fine dividing line sometimes.
Kevin Dixon wrote:
F@@KING WOODS OR WOOD WHO GIVES A F@@K THATS MY LOT FOR THIS SEASON I HAVE SEEN ENOUGH AND HAD ENOUGH. :!:


I was only saying. :roll:

_________________
There's no way Chuck Norris is harder than Stallone. Even if he did serve in 'Nam.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
We knew that both keepers form was questionable at the start of the season. i was disappointed that we didn't sign someone experienced or even bid for a decent keeper. You get what you pay for, we knew that Lee Barratt was shite in the non league for Weymouth although many on here claimed that the Weymouth fans knew nowt and that George Wood was an expert and we also knew that Jan Budtz was crap when he lost his confidence because the Donny fans said.

The keepers have had their chance and they are bobbins......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:59 pm
Posts: 6944
Location: up jacks arse in america.
Obafemi-Obsession wrote:
Kevin Dixon wrote:
F@@KING WOODS OR WOOD WHO GIVES A F@@K THATS MY LOT FOR THIS SEASON I HAVE SEEN ENOUGH AND HAD ENOUGH. :!:


I was only saying. :roll:
wood you beleive it. clappp

_________________
Low, lie the fields of Athenry,
Where once we watched the small free birds fly.
Our love was on the wind*,
We had dreams and songs to sing.
It's so lonely 'round the Fields of Athenry.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:13 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Somewhere between stupid and clever. It's a fine dividing line sometimes.
Jonny wrote:
We knew that both keepers form was questionable at the start of the season. i was disappointed that we didn't sign someone experienced or even bid for a decent keeper. You get what you pay for, we knew that Lee Barratt was shite in the non league for Weymouth although many on here claimed that the Weymouth fans knew nowt and that George Wood was an expert and we also knew that Jan Budtz was crap when he lost his confidence because the Donny fans said.

The keepers have had their chance and they are bobbins......


Agreed. But you are wrong about Sweeney.

_________________
There's no way Chuck Norris is harder than Stallone. Even if he did serve in 'Nam.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
Sweeney is masssively inconsistant, he was rubbish again tonight..... as were many others.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:59 pm
Posts: 6944
Location: up jacks arse in america.
Jonny wrote:
Sweeney is masssively inconsistant, he was rubbish again tonight..... as were many others.....
Agree Jonny the number of times he lost the ball in and around the box tonight.

_________________
Low, lie the fields of Athenry,
Where once we watched the small free birds fly.
Our love was on the wind*,
We had dreams and songs to sing.
It's so lonely 'round the Fields of Athenry.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GEORGE WOODS
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
His passing is abysmal, he never beats a man, he never puts his foot on the ball or controls games. On the plus side Sweens makes late runs into the box and grabs a goal once in a blue moon......


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: 15charactersmax, BansteadPoolie, BarryHarris57, Bazil, Bluestreak, bobby lemonade, charltonclive, Darlo4ever, Darylmore, DCooper170, derwent, DrPool, fckpoolie, Infidel, Jamie1952, Jules, Kenny Bottles, Kettering Poolie, Manchester Exile, Mctee1908, millhouseseats, nat the poolie, Ozzy Saltburn, Poolie_merv, Pooly_Imp, Rinkender, Robbie10, Sandman, Snailwood2, Snowy, Splod, Stotty1908, UKP, Warwick Hunt and 307 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.