Team for Tuesday

Jonny · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:51 am

.........................Jan Budtz............................

Nolan*...............Nelson.........Clark.............Robson**

Moore..............Boland.............Liddle..........Humphreys

......................Brown***.............Porter.....................

Subs
Allison (GK)
Foley****
Antwi
Barker
Turnbull

* If McCunnie is fit then he should play instead of Nolan

** if Monkhouse is fit then he should replace Robson and Ritchie should drop back to LB

*** Brown and Moore to interchange between posistions to find space effectively and stretch the opposistion defence.

**** Or Michael Mackay if he is fit.

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Jonny wrote:

.........................Jan Budtz............................

Nolan*...............Nelson.........Clark.............Robson**

Moore..............Boland.............Liddle..........Humphreys

......................Brown***.............Porter.....................

Subs
Allison (GK)
Foley****
Antwi
Barker
Turnbull

* If McCunnie is fit then he should play instead of Nolan

** if Monkhouse is fit then he should replace Robson and Ritchie should drop back to LB

*** Brown and Moore to interchange between posistions to find space effectively and stretch the opposistion defence.

**** Or Michael Mackay if he is fit.

I'd swap Robson and Humphreys out of that lot and put Sweeney in instead of Boland.

Otherwise, it's not a bad side.

Doug the head · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:49 am

.........................Jan Budtz............................

Nolan...............Nelson.........Clark.............Humphreys

Foley.............Boland.............Liddle..........Robson

......................Brown.............Porter.....................

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

MadJohn wrote:

Hopefully McCunnie is fit for tomorrow. If so, then he can replace Nolan. Longer term I see McCunnie as a midfielder, but for now (and probably for the rest of this season) we need a full back. If he's not fit then there aren't many options. Liddle? Antwi? Back three? I would keep Humphreys on the wing for now as he has been one of our better players in the last month, though when Monkhouse is fit then he starts on the wing with Humps dropping back. Either way, Robson starts ahead of Elliott.

Bobby Robson would start ahead of Robbie Elliott if I had my way

P.M.T. · **Joined:** Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:14 pm **Posts:** 968

Knowing Wilson he will probably drop Humphries,Brown,Porter and Clark and bring back Ali Gibb
banghead

Poolsrme · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:44 pm

Nolan will definitely not be playing refred

Larry60 · **Joined:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:30 pm **Posts:** 4

I agree - Brown & Porter up front, NO Barker. Humphreys not a full back - doesn't close down opponents and fails to prevent crosses into the area. This has cost goals against. Drop Nelson and move Liddle into back four. Foley on from the start, too. Larry60.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

Leisure suit?

aido87 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:39 pm

Larry60 wrote:

I agree - Brown & Porter up front, NO Barker. Humphreys not a full back - doesn't close down opponents and fails to prevent crosses into the area. This has cost goals against. Drop Nelson and move Liddle into back four. Foley on from the start, too. Larry60.

Mr I wrote:

Leisure suit?

i would guess more a snorkel parka. and cords. and sandals. with socks. refred

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

Maybe that one passed you young 'uns by.

Leisure Suit Larry was one of the very early IMB-PC games - circa 1985/86

aido87 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:00 pm

Mr I wrote:

Maybe that one passed you young 'uns by.

Leisure Suit Larry was one of the very early IMB-PC games - circa 1985/86

yeah, we know. thanks dad. :roll:

Chimpchoker · **Joined:** Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:58 pm **Posts:** 37

Proudlock, Trevena, Tait, Forbes, Horner, Gott, Haymer, Rowell, Ruddy, Tymon, Scott.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:08 pm

.........................Barker............................
.
Barker..........Barker ......Barker............Barker
.
Barker.......Barker..........Barker ..........Barker
.
..........Barker..................... Barker

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

Chimpchoker wrote:

Proudlock, Trevena, Tait, Forbes, Horner, Gott, Haymer, Rowell, Ruddy, Tymon, Scott.

That was my first thought too. Drop the friggin lot of the idle gets.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

aido87 wrote:

Mr I wrote:

Maybe that one passed you young 'uns by.

Leisure Suit Larry was one of the very early IMB-PC games - circa 1985/86

yeah, we know. thanks dad. :roll:

You might, I didn't.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 pm

gravedisorder wrote:

.........................Barker............................
.
Barker..........Barker ......Barker............Barker
.
Barker.......Barker..........Barker ..........Barker
.
..........Barker..................... Barker

Hawklord · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm **Posts:** 3115

Yes, but who are the subs? :shock:

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:08 pm

..................Budtz.................

..McCunnie.. Antwi.. Clark.. Humphreys

..Brown.. Sweeney.. Liddle.. Robson

.............Moore... Porter............

Subs

Barker
Nelson
Foley
Boland
ALB

aido87 · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:18 pm

i much prefer it when we agree PJ. :wink:

poolsdonkey · **Joined:** Sun May 06, 2007 8:52 pm **Posts:** 512

ALB
Humphreys
Clarke
Antwi
McCunnie
Monkhouse
Liddle
Boland
Brown
Porter
Daly

Subs:
Barker
Moore
Mackay
Foley
Budtz

Good old attacking bench for when we fall behind and go 7 up front

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

we dont carry a keeper at home so give michael rae a bench seat
or better still give him a start

Jonny · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:06 am

gremmlin wrote:

we dont carry a keeper at home so give michael rae a bench seat
or better still give him a start

Someone told me that Antwi can play in goal at a reasonable level, so that is why Danny never picks a keeper. he's out version of phil Jagielka....

ProudPoolie · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:41 am

......................................Lee-Barett................................

....................Nelson..............Clark..........antwi..................

...Mccunnie........................................................Humphreys

.........................Liddle..................Sweeney........................

......................................Brown........................................

.......................Porter....................Moore...........................

Subs - Barker, Boland, Budtz, Foley, Rae.

We conceding too many daft goals so fill the back with centre halfs put some pace up front and some forward thinking in Midfield with options down the wing. Wilson will play nothing like this but it might be what we need.

Wilson team IMO, he will wield the axe

i reckon Robson in for elliot and Humps Left back and a different right back (mccunnie if fit, if not liddle in and sweens in midfield) other than that i dont think he will change anything and if he doesnt i cant wait to see the reaction on here tomorrow night :laugh:

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

PJ_Poolie wrote:

..................Budtz.................

..McCunnie.. Antwi.. Clark.. Humphreys

..Brown.. Sweeney.. Liddle.. Robson

.............Moore... Porter............

Subs

Barker
Nelson
Foley
Boland
ALB

As bad as Nelson has been recently, I'd have him there over Antwi any day of the week.

katcha · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:12 am

looks like mccunnie and mackay may both be playing

so i'll go for

experimental

keeper - doesnt matter which one really does it

mccunnie
humpty dumpty
nelson
clark

brown
liddle
sweeney
porter

mackay
moore

bench -

barker
boland
rae
antwi
robson

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:15 am

I'd like to see this team start tonight...

GK Lee-Barrett
RB McCunnie
LB Humphreys
CB Clark
CB Nelson
RM Brown
LM Monkhouse
CM Liddle
CM Sweeney
CF Porter
CF Moore

Subs; Budtz, Antwi, Robson, Mackay, Barker.

But it won't happen. sadx

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Mr Ripper wrote:

I'd like to see this team start tonight...

GK Lee-Barrett
RB McCunnie
LB Humphreys
CB Clark
CB Nelson
RM Brown
LM Monkhouse
CM Liddle
CM Sweeney
CF Porter
CF Moore

Subs; Budtz, Antwi, Robson, Mackay, Barker.

But it won't happen. sadx

That team could challenge for the play-offs for me, no question.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:43 am

I'd like to see this team play:

Watling
Drysdale - W. Moore - Nelson - McKinnon
Luke - Pedersen - Fogarty - Monkhouse
Allon - Boyd

P.M.T. · **Joined:** Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:14 pm **Posts:** 968

Richard M. Head wrote:

I'd like to see this team play:

Watling
Drysdale - W. Moore - Nelson - McKinnon
Luke - Pedersen - Fogarty - Monkhouse
Allon - Boyd

Fogarty would be sent off after 10 minutes refred

Spender · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:09 pm

ProudPoolie wrote:

......................................Lee-Barett................................

....................Nelson..............Clark..........antwi..................

...Mccunnie........................................................Humphreys

.........................Liddle..................Sweeney........................

......................................Brown........................................

.......................Porter....................Moore...........................

Subs - Barker, Boland, Budtz, Foley, Rae.

We conceding too many daft goals so fill the back with centre halfs put some pace up front and some forward thinking in Midfield with options down the wing. Wilson will play nothing like this but it might be what we need.

Wilson team IMO, he will wield the axe

i reckon Robson in for elliot and Humps Left back and a different right back (mccunnie if fit, if not liddle in and sweens in midfield) other than that i dont think he will change anything and if he doesnt i cant wait to see the reaction on here tomorrow night :laugh:

I like the cut of this fella's gib. :grin:

Except I'd bin Boland, I've never been a fan, I always said he was crap ((c)Chip) and of course Ben Clark can move forward and make it a standard 4-4-2.

Nice call.

aido87 · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:39 pm

can't see playing three at the back is going to help nelson improve his recent performances.

budtz
mccunnie
antwi
clark
humphreys
thompson
liddle
sweeney
porter
moore
brown

bench : nelson, barker, mackay, robson, foley

argue with that, i just blinkin well dare ya :evil:

Rain Dog · **Joined:** Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:46 pm **Posts:** 39

Lee Barrett
McCunnie
Nelson
Clark
Humphries
Brown
Liddle
Thompson
Robson
Porter.
Moore

Bench: Antwi Barker Sweeney Foley Mackay/Rae
Drink: Bovril
Pie: Mince and Potato
Feet: Freezing

ProudPoolie · **Posted:** Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:08 pm

Pooliekev wrote:

ProudPoolie wrote:

......................................Lee-Barett................................

....................Nelson..............Clark..........antwi..................

...Mccunnie........................................................Humphreys

.........................Liddle..................Sweeney........................

......................................Brown........................................

.......................Porter....................Moore...........................

Subs - Barker, Boland, Budtz, Foley, Rae.

We conceding too many daft goals so fill the back with centre halfs put some pace up front and some forward thinking in Midfield with options down the wing. Wilson will play nothing like this but it might be what we need.

Wilson team IMO, he will wield the axe

i reckon Robson in for elliot and Humps Left back and a different right back (mccunnie if fit, if not liddle in and sweens in midfield) other than that i dont think he will change anything and if he doesnt i cant wait to see the reaction on here tomorrow night :laugh:

I like the cut of this fella's gib. :grin:

Except I'd bin Boland, I've never been a fan, I always said he was crap ((c)Chip) and of course Ben Clark can move forward and make it a standard 4-4-2.

Nice call.

Thanks

My CV sent to Victoria Park, Clarence Road F.A.O Mr K Hodcroft :laugh:

Team for Tuesday

Gadgies online