Leeds interested in Boydie

aptid · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:49 pm **Posts:** 1506

Can't help feel we should have had him back. Dw would have had him playing leftback anyway. rage

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

500K, we could have him for nowt. banghead

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:41 pm

Big Boydie fan me but i'm not sure it would have been the right move to have Adam back at our club.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:28 pm

DanielGaunt wrote:

500K, we could have him for nowt. banghead

Says who!?

Do you honestly reckon Luton would have let him join Pools for nothing 12 months after paying £500,000 for him? Not a chance.

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

PJ_Poolie wrote:

DanielGaunt wrote:

500K, we could have him for nowt. banghead

Says who!?

Do you honestly reckon Luton would have let him join Pools for nothing 12 months after paying £500,000 for him? Not a chance.

He had his contact cancelled. He could have gone anywhere for nowt.

Warwick Hunt · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:32 pm

I wouldn't have had him back

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:33 pm

No he had his contract canceled to enable him to move to Leyton Orient, it doesn't mean to say the same would have happened if it was Pools who had approached Luton. He was never a free agent.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:39 pm

PJ_Poolie wrote:

No he had his contract canceled to enable him to move to Leyton Orient, it doesn't mean to say the same would have happened if it was Pools who had approached Luton. He was never a free agent.

Exactly.

Luton still owed Pools money for him (instalment payments) so wouldn't let him come back here and still pay them.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Have they paid us fully for him now then?

As I reckon they may not be able to afford it if we haven't.

Spender · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:05 pm

Orient had to pay his contract up so he could move. He wasn't a free transfer but there was no fee as such.

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

a fit Boyd along side Brownie clappp

Jonny · **Posted:** Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:15 pm

boyd was a snip for the 150k that Darlo had accepted, we should of signed him or at least made a bid as he was and still is better than what we have.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:43 am

MadJohn wrote:

ADG wrote:

If you wouldnt have Boydie back then I think you are fookin mad.

Boydie or Barker?

That wasn't the choice though was it. If you're looking at summer signings the choice (if indeed there ever was a choice) would have been Boyd or Moore.

Don't let the facts get in the way of an ADG rant though, MJ!

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:36 pm

I liked Boydie as a player and wouldn't be upset if he was in our squad now.

But how many times did folk cry out that we should sign a big powerful centre forward (at least as an option to use) before Barker signed.

I don't think that Barker is the problem as he is useful at times. I think that the problem is the way that Wilson uses him and the amount of time he gives him on the pitch.

Yubep · **Joined:** Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm **Posts:** 25266

Maybe Boydie didn't want to come back?

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:12 pm

Yubep wrote:

Maybe Boydie didn't want to come back?

Sshhh.

You blow a lot of peoples fantasies and obsessions to pieces! :laugh:

katcha · **Posted:** Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:27 pm

he did - chip saw his dad's next door neighbour near the yoghurts in asda and he told him

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

thats a lie he spoke to his mrs

Leeds interested in Boydie

Gadgies online