Wilson to buy more defenders

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/sport/W ... 3632747.jp

This is what I'd do.

ALB (or new keeper if Wilson doesn't think he's up to it)

RB: McCunnie
CB: Nelson
CB: Clark
LB: Humphreys

Plus new CB for cover, a new left back, a new right back for cover if he thinks Barron isn't up to it and a new keeper for cover or as first choice.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

Danny FFS its not that hard.

Certainly sign a decent left back if you can but what about Coles on the right who hardly put a foot wrong early doors this season?. Send Antwi back whence he came and put Nelson and Clark back together.

Oh, and tell your goalies that they are allowed to shout.

Mute Witness · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:10 am **Posts:** 3572

ADG wrote:

you meant McCunnie didnt you? :shock:

I fooking hope he did.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:16 pm

No but you've got to remember McCunnie was partially at fault for a goal at home to Carlisle in early October when he allowed a diagonal ball to bounce, a terrible heinous crime I know . On the back of that we signed Danny Coles to deal with these long diagonal balls, he couldn't pass wind but could he deal with those balls...... after this minor error Jamie McCunnie must never be allowed to play right back again he's a holding midfielder now... an area of the field were balls are generally undiagonal and not so long. On the other hand it's alright for the Budtz/Nelson/Antwi trio to be at fault for goals in every game without the threat of being dropped or replaced rage

ronaldo · **Joined:** Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:53 pm **Posts:** 861

My friend, forget about this season, its over. We need to go back to basics,start afresh. A clear out is needed but now aint possible or practical. Give Wilson to end of season and then if no good get rid and start again.

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

no good now so can we get rid?

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:00 pm

chip fireball wrote:

the bloke is losing the plot.

He lost the plot ages ago. refred

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37138

chip fireball wrote:

this is so good im posting it on 2 threads at the same time.

heres the actual words of wisdom direct from wilson as printed in tonights mail, and i quote :

" most of our lads got clean sheets last year and all they have done is step up a division. there are players there who did it in this division 2 years ago as well so there is no reason why they cannot get back to that level. if they cant we will bring people in. we will have to, we cant let this carry on. "

danny, the keeper and 3 of the 4 defenders playing yesterday were not here last season. they were not here 2 seasons ago. the four of them are players you have signed yourself in the last 6 months. if they are not up to the job then whey for the love of god did you sign them ? and why should the chairman give you more hard earned to go out and sign another set of duffers when the good players who kept all the clean sheets are sat in the reserves ffs ?

he then goes on, and i quote :

" for an hour thats the best we played away from home and they never threatened us. "

danny son, when you say they never threatened us you seem to be overlooking the fact that they scored after 42 minutes, hit the post after 43 minutes, and missed an open goal after 44 minutes. generally speaking these are perceived as threats. especially when they score the goals. thats a bad thing in most peoples books.

the bloke is losing the plot.

Chip, the 42 minutes he is going on about must have been spread out over the game...2 here 4 there, etc... that is the only cock eyed logic that would explain his theory.

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

gravedisorder wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

the bloke is losing the plot.

He lost the plot ages ago. refred

there was a plot :shock:

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22635

ADG wrote:

you meant McCunnie didnt you? :shock:

Yes I did

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

best one in the mail today "THEY" WILL HAVE TO START LOOKING OVER "THEIR" SHOULDERS so it is all down to the players then the management are free from blame

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:38 pm

chip fireball wrote:

has anyone seen this horwood play we are meant to be signing ? apparently he was on loan at the loids last season. is he any good ?

A few sendings off and blamed by their fans for a few goals (including giving penalties away) if I remember rightly. :roll:

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:15 pm

Why on earth would Wilson sign a left back when we haven't already got one?

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

cover for barker ? :sweeeet:

Kolley Kibber · **Posted:** Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:52 pm

chip fireball wrote:

has anyone seen this horwood play we are meant to be signing ? apparently he was on loan at the loids last season. is he any good ?

Evan's a good player, quick and with a good footballing brain. A little on the slight side like. He's been playing well for

Wilson to buy more defenders

Gadgies online