Kids again

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:18 pm

The Government has also announced it wants to look at what is ok to advertise to kids. An Ed Balls brainchild so no doubt half-arsed.

They reckon that under 10's know too many brands and are too easily influenced. I can agree with this and it's wrong.

First starting point surely would be to target the fat kids and stop the likes of McDonalds from giving toys away with burgers. Only allow them to give toys away with a salad and see if the fat lazy knackers will try and eat healthily!

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:23 pm

I'd have turnstiles or narrow doorways on supermarkets, take aways and fast food places too.

For kids and for adults.

If you're too fat to get in then you shouldn't be eating til you lose weight.

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:21 pm

Mr Ripper wrote:

I'd have turnstiles or narrow doorways on supermarkets, take aways and fast food places too.

For kids and for adults.

If you're too fat to get in then you shouldn't be eating til you lose weight.

tom-pie · **Posted:** Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:17 pm

fat=lazy
lazy= waste of space
waste of space= fat

therefore they cant help it

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 37080

tom-pie wrote:

fat=lazy
lazy= waste of space
waste of space= fat

therefore they cant help it

...from someone whose name includes the word 'pie'.... :roll:

Miss Tigga · **Posted:** Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:43 pm

Mr Ripper wrote:

I'd have turnstiles or narrow doorways on supermarkets, take aways and fast food places too.

For kids and for adults.

If you're too fat to get in then you shouldn't be eating til you lose weight.

If that was gonna happen then they'd all just get their shopping or takeaways delivered so wouldn't really work.

Dugoutpaddy · **Joined:** Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:23 am **Posts:** 1772

Wouldn't you think that this nanny matriarchal type state we live in would think about the health of kids a bit more than banning smoking and warning about binge drinking rage

When the majority of kids are facing a future where they are in serious danger of not surving 50 yrs old because of the amount of junk shyte they stuff in their pody physogs and the parents condone it coz they are just lazy fat knackers and can't be bothered to cook, macdonalds and the like seem to avoid the same level of scrutiny given to every thing else.

I'd rather eat dog shyte

rage

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:25 am

Miss Tigga wrote:

Mr Ripper wrote:

I'd have turnstiles or narrow doorways on supermarkets, take aways and fast food places too.

For kids and for adults.

If you're too fat to get in then you shouldn't be eating til you lose weight.

If that was gonna happen then they'd all just get their shopping or takeaways delivered so wouldn't really work.

Then I'd ban home deliveries, they're for lazy people anyway.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:01 pm

Dugoutpaddy wrote:

Wouldn't you think that this nanny matriarchal type state we live in would think about the health of kids a bit more than banning smoking and warning about binge drinking rage

When the majority of kids are facing a future where they are in serious danger of not surving 50 yrs old because of the amount of junk shyte they stuff in their pody physogs and the parents condone it coz they are just lazy fat knackers and can't be bothered to cook, macdonalds and the like seem to avoid the same level of scrutiny given to every thing else.

I'd rather eat dog shyte

rage

This isnt Mcdonalds fault

If you are too piss weak as a parent to give into your kids every whim, too lazy to take them for a walk or to the baths, then you should be sterilised after the first one is born to stop you dropping them out every 9 months

Kids again

Gadgies online