Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 8:59 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am
Posts: 1588
pre season you wouldn't of put money on our weakest positions being the centre backs and the front 2 would you?
the weakness of the squad is only highlighted because some key players aren't performing as well this season,might be due to better opposition I don't know I haven't managed or played at a reasonable level.

_________________
if I were a linesman,I would execute defenders who applauded my offsides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 1544
Location: stuck in my bivvy on the ressy with my delkims and 4k of scopex squid livers
Mr Ripper wrote:
Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.


GK - weak ??? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:39 pm 
aido87 wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.


GK - weak ??? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead :evil:


I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am
Posts: 9053
Cowboy wrote:
aido87 wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.


GK - weak ??? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead :evil:


I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!


yet Coventry still signed him! Strange.

_________________
Apols


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OUR SQUAD
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Cowboy wrote:
aido87 wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.


GK - weak ??? sctatchinghead sctatchinghead sctatchinghead :evil:


I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!


Well said Mr Cowboy. clappp

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: ALMoody, charltonclive, Devo, Elephant Rock, Infidel, Jazzmorgans123, JohnnyMars, Manchester Exile, Mikey76, nat the poolie, Poolie_merv, Pools-on-trent, Preston Poolie, Sedgefield Poolie, Snowy, Splod and 227 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.