Why take off our biggest threat (porter) Sweeney should have come on 10 min earlier for boland. He's starting to worry me and a few others who i stand with.

I concur.

I agree too, and if someone posts a repetative post in another hour, I may disagree, then again I may not

I probably disagree or not,I'm not too sure at the minute.I'll get back to you

You seem surprised. He does the same thing every game

i.e injuries aside, he makes is first change about 10 mins
from the end and another in the last 5 minutes.
These changes usually involve, Porter (going on or coming off)
and then Foley or McKay going on (often for Brown)

Yesterday, we needed someone running at them , from midfield.
Sweeney imho , should have started, but failing that should have
been on at half time. Giving him ten minutes (or whatever it was)
just makes him look a tit, as he had no time to get involved.

Taking our one naturally left sided attacker off, was totally
ridiculous, but unfortunately as I've already said, predictable.