Assuming Boland isn't 100% fit.

Lee-Barrett
Humphreys-Clark-Nelson-McCunnie
Monkhouse-Liddle-Sweeney-Brown
Porter-Moore

Subs:

MacKay
Foley
Boland
Antwi
Robson

what's Barker done to upset you ?
not even on the bench

If Boland doesn't play, then I think you'll find McCunnie in midfield
and the new boy at right back.

Otherwise, if Boland and Bob are fit, the team will be as last week.

I would love to see your team (with Boland in, for Sweeney)
but you know as well I, that it isn't going to happen

I just think that we need to try something different. Barker is a great Div 4 centre forward but I fear he struggles at this level.

I agree
but the man who matters, doesn't

The team that I would pick;

GK Lee-Barrett
RB McCunnie
LB Humphreys
CB Nelson
CB Clark
RW Brown
LW Monkhouse
CM Boland
CM Liddle
CF Porter
CF Moore

assuming that all are fit.

If Boland isn't fit I'd play Coles at right back and move McCunnie into midfield.

If Monkhouse isn't fit I'd put Matty Robson in as a direct replacement.

BUT, the team I fully expect to see start tomorrow, fitness permitting, is;

GK Budtz
RB McCunnie
LB Humphreys
CB Nelson
CB Antwi
RW Brown
LW Monkhouse
CM Boland
CM Liddle
CF Barker
CF Moore

Are you winding me up? Linford Humphreys on the left wing??

Are you expecting them to play their 77/78 team?

At the minute fans favourite pairing up front would appear to be Porter & Moore.

But the style we've been playing means we need a target man and while joel is strong on the ball the hobbit isn't the tallest lad we've got which would mean everything being targeted at Monky and not using him where he's best.

I bet DW would like to be in a position to experiment and play Porter & Moore but this early in the season and against Forest I can't see it happening.

Budzt
McCunnie Nelson Antwi Humphries
Brown Boland Liddle Monkhouse
Moore Barker

Bench: Coles Barratt Foley Sweeney Mackay

Betcha.

Maybe. But Foley made one and Mackay scored one and even if you have played at any level you can't knock that, surely.

I really don't think we can afford to put someone on for six games in the hope that he'll come good when in actual fact the goals for column is quite healthy.

Let me amend that, the goals for column is the second best after unbeaten Leeds.

1.porter
2.porter
3.porter
4.porter
5.porter
6.porter
7.porter
8.porter
9.porter
10 porter
11 bullock

Thats just stupid!! I mean what the f*** is bullock doing in there????

he's there so we've got someone to blame should the worst happen

His height provides cover in defensive situations and so forth, now if you had played at the same level as Chip 'boland is crap, well I said he was, but now I've changed me mind' Fireball, you would of known that!!