Front two

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Votes again please

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:27 am

Do you think Brown/Porter is as near as we could get to emulating the Boyd/Porter system?
And if so who would play left wing?

Edit: correction, right wing!

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Richard M. Head wrote:

Do you think Brown/Porter is as near as we could get to emulating the Boyd/Porter system?
And if so who would play left wing?

If that was the front combination of choice then there's only one option for left wing - Mr M Robson.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:31 am

Mr I wrote:

Richard M. Head wrote:

Do you think Brown/Porter is as near as we could get to emulating the Boyd/Porter system?
And if so who would play left wing?

If that was the front combination of choice then there's only one option for left wing - Mr M Robson.

Andy Monkhouse?

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Matty on the left, Monkhouse on the right.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:33 am

Mr I wrote:

Matty on the left, Monkhouse on the right.

Aye.

Cos Monky was class on the right against Walsall.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Shurrup you.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:36 am

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Anyway, it looks like the preferred choice is Porter & Moore.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:43 am

Oops I meant right wing :uhoh:

I believe the only cover we have in that department is Gibb and ... er ... is Maidens still here?

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Cover for the right win.............................. McCunnie? Gibb, or ermm Humphreys if we use a very heavy ball and steal the oppositions studs.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:47 am

Richard M. Head wrote:

Oops I meant right wing :uhoh:

I believe the only cover we have in that department is Gibb and ... er ... is Maidens still here?

If we had some pace, mobility and skill up front I'd give Ali G a go.

At the moment we are dependant on pace coming in from the flanks because of the silly pairing that he persists with up front just because he signed them both.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:06 am

On a related subject, would it be worth gradually extending the time Mackay spends on the pitch to more than 10 minutes?

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:08 am

Richard M. Head wrote:

On a related subject, would it be worth gradually extending the time Mackay spends on the pitch to more than 10 minutes?

Yes.

townendtimmy · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:06 pm

Mackay and Porter for me

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

Where's the Porter and Chip, option ?

Seriously though, Porter and any of the others, probably Barker or Moore
He's got to be given a run of starts, to get his match sharpness back.

Croydon Poolie · **Posted:** Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:38 pm

Mr I wrote:

Cover for the right win.............................. McCunnie?

I reckon McCunnie could do a decent job on the wing, he's got a good touch, looks willing to take players on and can knock a decent ball in. We could then bring Coles in at right back and stick JB up front with Joel.

Saying that I would rather see no changes down the right side and Joel and Moore up front.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

Interesting that no-one has gone for the current partnership.

Porter and Moore is the pairing of choice.

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 22622

71% reckon that it should be Porter & Moore, interesting. Even more interesting is that 88% want Porter to start alongside Moore or Barker.

Spender · **Posted:** Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:22 pm

chip fireball wrote:

id jump at the chance to play up front with joel porter. im currently lumbered with the ex seaham red star striker rob magee, who makes me do all the running about. dibble would confirm this to be so if he wasnt missing in action. :evil:

not that i will be doing any running about this saturday as townendtimmy has instructed one of his henchmen from the collieries to knack me in the opening minutes.

You think that's a problem?? :laugh:

Wait until next time you splash out on a Chinese. I think you'll find you're the second 'splashee....' :evil:

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

Mr I wrote:

Interesting that no-one has gone for the current partnership.

Porter and Moore is the pairing of choice.

I confess I voted for barker and moore.

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:13 pm

dawlishmonkey wrote:

Mr I wrote:

Interesting that no-one has gone for the current partnership.

Porter and Moore is the pairing of choice.

I confess I voted for barker and moore.

Kick him out! rage

Dugoutpaddy · **Joined:** Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:23 am **Posts:** 1772

No Mackay?

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

chip fireball wrote:

barker and moore have got us to 5th so i cant see the manager changing it until we drop to mid table.

exactly,nor should he.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:08 am

dawlishmonkey wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

barker and moore have got us to 5th so i cant see the manager changing it until we drop to mid table.

exactly,nor should he.

Although we have just scraped 1 point from 2 home games...

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

but moore didn't play on saturday.

Montpoolier · **Posted:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:23 pm

I'm telling yous Danny Wilson still hasn't twigged it's not Ian Storey Moore he signed.

Front two

Gadgies online