Loyal_fan

[MutleyRules]

Looks like his membership has been deleted.

[kevin pooles gloves]

Who by.
Keir2

[Jamie1952]

Not on the members list either ?

[Ozzy Saltburn]

Shame. Loyal's opinions were most certainly hyper critical of Pools but you have to take him with a pinch of salt. Never once did he call other posters "racist kunt". Board will be less of a laugh without him. Here's hoping he returns maybe under another name like Loya Fan Rules, something like that.

[MutleyRules]

Shame. Loyal's opinions were most certainly hyper critical of Pools but you have to take him with a pinch of salt. Never once did he call other posters "racist kunt". Board will be less of a laugh without him. Here's hoping he returns maybe under another name like Loya Fan Rules, something like that.

I agree and he never wanted someone to fuck off and die either.
He'll be missed.

[Kettering Poolie]

His worrying obsession with just how good he thought Killip was, was also comedy gold! Though sadly not been mentioned since Cartwright turned up

[kevin pooles gloves]

His up to date comments will be missed on a match day.
A Bunker legend.

Bring back the Loyal.

[Flying Hogans]

His up to date comments will be missed on a match day.

The dodgy stick fraternity mourns

[Jamie1952]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

[derwent]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

[derwent]

Who by.
Keir2

You have a PM, please answer it, thank you.

[MutleyRules]

Who by....Telly Savalas??
Can I have a PM please??

[derwent]

Who by....Telly Savalas??
Can I have a PM please??

Sent.

[MutleyRules]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

[MutleyRules]

Am I banned derwent for stating that there’s plenty of bullies on here...which there is???
99% of the posts Jamie1952 done got jumped on. Yes some deserved it...but not 99%. Ridiculous.

[MutleyRules]

billinghampoolie1908 and KPG....did you two get the same PM as me....a simple...but hilarious....'hello'??? My ribs are still killing me BTW.

[MutleyRules]

Decent screenshots BTW.

[billinghampoolie1908]

I got a similar one i have a feeling someone is having a bad day. Got to be careful losing regular posters whether you like them or dont. Freedom of speech. Loyal probably was pessimistic but stats tend to back him up that it normally turns out that way so hardly wrong. I guess we all need to be happy clappers, even though the club is still a mess hidden by a few early decent results.

[GingerGinola]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

I dont post much, I'm normally chilled about things and I certainly normally avoid non-football threads like the plague but yeah I've got to say I totally agree. That ban is ridiculous. Freedom of opinion encouraged unless you gave a different one. Jamie is shouted down or piss taken in every thread, often from the more obnoxious types. No ban for them though. This forum has been heading to the gutter for a while, and most of the people left are shouty types turning every thread into a boring political argument.

There's another thread still up praising that racist criminal thug Yaxley-Lennon. Different political opinions are fine, but then there is just basic fucking human decency.

8-10 people regularly post (me not included!) on here. 500-1500 browse. There's a reason more don't post, me included. It's embarrassing to be honest. Imagine moving to Hpool and wanting to go to Pools, reading the stuff on here.....hmm.

Mr I said the other month the moderation hasn't been good enough. He was right about that at least.

Anyway, like a satisfying shit I'm glad that's out. So am I.

Derwent, I've been trying to delete my account but there is no way to. Delete it please. To the balanced posters on here, bye and thanks for trying, to the dickheads I'll be in the anti fascist march in London on Saturday, I know you won't be there as you are a bunch of lazy keyboard warriors.

[KeithNobbsBigToe]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

I dont post much, I'm normally chilled about things and I certainly normally avoid non-football threads like the plague but yeah I've got to say I totally agree. That ban is ridiculous. Freedom of opinion encouraged unless you gave a different one. Jamie is shouted down or piss taken in every thread, often from the more obnoxious types. No ban for them though. This forum has been heading to the gutter for a while, and most of the people left are shouty types turning every thread into a boring political argument.

There's another thread still up praising that racist criminal thug Yaxley-Lennon. Different political opinions are fine, but then there is just basic fucking human decency.

8-10 people regularly post (me not included!) on here. 500-1500 browse. There's a reason more don't post, me included. It's embarrassing to be honest. Imagine moving to Hpool and wanting to go to Pools, reading the stuff on here.....hmm.

Mr I said the other month the moderation hasn't been good enough. He was right about that at least.

Anyway, like a satisfying shit I'm glad that's out. So am I.

Derwent, I've been trying to delete my account but there is no way to. Delete it please. To the balanced posters on here, bye and thanks for trying, to the dickheads I'll be in the anti fascist march in London on Saturday, I know you won't be there as you are a bunch of lazy keyboard warriors.

Cracking post Ginola

No doubt not all, but I suspect a fair few agree with you, myself included

Remember back when the bunker began, a bunch of poolies having some banter and sharing gossip about pools

Look how far its sunk

[derwent]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

[derwent]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

I dont post much, I'm normally chilled about things and I certainly normally avoid non-football threads like the plague but yeah I've got to say I totally agree. That ban is ridiculous. Freedom of opinion encouraged unless you gave a different one. Jamie is shouted down or piss taken in every thread, often from the more obnoxious types. No ban for them though. This forum has been heading to the gutter for a while, and most of the people left are shouty types turning every thread into a boring political argument.

There's another thread still up praising that racist criminal thug Yaxley-Lennon. Different political opinions are fine, but then there is just basic fucking human decency.

8-10 people regularly post (me not included!) on here. 500-1500 browse. There's a reason more don't post, me included. It's embarrassing to be honest. Imagine moving to Hpool and wanting to go to Pools, reading the stuff on here.....hmm.

Mr I said the other month the moderation hasn't been good enough. He was right about that at least.

Anyway, like a satisfying shit I'm glad that's out. So am I.

Derwent, I've been trying to delete my account but there is no way to. Delete it please. To the balanced posters on here, bye and thanks for trying, to the dickheads I'll be in the anti fascist march in London on Saturday, I know you won't be there as you are a bunch of lazy keyboard warriors.

The policy carried out on here regarding requests for the closing of accounts is usually that if you don't want to take an active part that is acceptable as your choice but the account is left open should you want to change your mind and return some time in the future. You don't have to read the forum or take part in it which, in essence, is tantamount to the same thing.
To make a wide observation of the gist of your post, times have changed and modern standards, whether they are for the good or not, dictate a different approach. Whilst I have sympathy with your point of view the consensus of modern thinking is going back to how things where is not classed as a way forward.
Anyway thank you for your thoughts and past contribution and all the very best to you, always remembering you are welcome to contribute at any time and at your convenience. Kind Regards.

[Ozzy Saltburn]

What a shame Ginger Ginola has decided to flounce. I would have been very interested in swapping opinions with him in a civilized and courteous manner. The thing I am most interested in, is why people who are unhappy with ever increasing numbers of undocumented economic migrants turning up on our shores and being treated better than native Brits, should be labelled as fascists? I mean whats all that about? I am also very interested in what Ginger Ginola's defintion of facist actually is, because as he is joining an anti facist demonstration he must have an idea of what it is he is demonstrating against. Ah well, he's made his final insult and legged it, so no further dialogue will be possible. Funny that. If I feel passionate about an issue, I am more than happy to to exchange thoughts with others (with one exception of course).

[MutleyRules]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??

[MutleyRules]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

[MutleyRules]

What a shame Ginger Ginola has decided to flounce. I would have been very interested in swapping opinions with him in a civilized and courteous manner. The thing I am most interested in, is why people who are unhappy with ever increasing numbers of undocumented economic migrants turning up on our shores and being treated better than native Brits, should be labelled as fascists? I mean whats all that about? I am also very interested in what Ginger Ginola's defintion of facist actually is, because as he is joining an anti facist demonstration he must have an idea of what it is he is demonstrating against. Ah well, he's made his final insult and legged it, so no further dialogue will be possible. Funny that. If I feel passionate about an issue, I am more than happy to to exchange thoughts with others (with one exception of course).

I very much doubt GG would want to get into a conversation with you, a divvy auld racist, even if he was still posting on here.
And talking about 'flouncing'....I seem to recall you doing a 'flounce' off here for a good few months after my 'ban' was overturned by the boards owner. I also seem to recall you were the only person who 'applauded' the initial 'ban'.
Oddie Johnny Come Lately.
Dyke House....Mmmmmmm.

[derwent]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

Yes cahoots, there is too much indication of communication between the three of you to make that a fair conclusion.
Ah the racist card comes out of the top pocket again. I have noticed you have also used the thread to attack Ozzy once again after he posted in a reasonable manner. What racist comment has he posted on this thread.
It is very significant that during a discussion on the behaviour to fellow members, you chuck in abuse to Mr Ozzy.
After your last spat with Mr Ozzy you stated the you regretted that it went too far. Those words are looking a bit hollow now don't you think.

[derwent]

There seems to be posts missing on this thread as it states there should be 28 and there is nowhere near that, unless that is an error.
I haven't removed any and neither has Mr I, who is looking into it. The latency is waxing and waning again.
It appears the hosting server is either crashed or playing up.
Mr I thinks he may have to rebuild the whole site.

[Snowy]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

So anyone who challenges someone’s opinions is a ‘bully’…?

Do you want to fill the board with like minded people to yourself…?

Everyone to have the same opinion …a bit Orwellian…?

This board was never the Nirvana you paint it as, just because the wind was blowing your way, doesn’t make it right or wrong…it wasn’t ‘founded’ on any principle, it’s a message board supposedly of varying opinions…I don’t recall any Charter even if there was a Class system.

[accrington fan]

there are posters you agree with and ones you do not. even if evry single one has a pop at you for a post your world aint going to end with your family. if you are not prepared to give out some stick or receive it then this place and others like it just aint for you. fact is you go to the vic and the hardest thing to find is a fan who reads this site never mind contributes.

[derwent]

there are posters you agree with and ones you do not. even if evry single one has a pop at you for a post your world aint going to end with your family. if you are not prepared to give out some stick or receive it then this place and others like it just aint for you. fact is you go to the vic and the hardest thing to find is a fan who reads this site never mind contributes.

Can you throw any light on the fact that there are 419 guests on here at the moment. I would suggest, politely of course, that some of these guests go to the Vic. I am too interested in what's going on to prattle on about message boards. But each to their own.

[Brian Honour's Left Foot]

there are posters you agree with and ones you do not. even if evry single one has a pop at you for a post your world aint going to end with your family. if you are not prepared to give out some stick or receive it then this place and others like it just aint for you. fact is you go to the vic and the hardest thing to find is a fan who reads this site never mind contributes.

Of the group that I go to Pools with, four are quite regular posters (on Pools issues alone) and one ventures into the political arena; another, unfortunately (as he was really quite funny) barely contributes these days. Personally I think the site has never recovered from the loss of various posters, in particular Monkeybutt, RIP.

[kevin pooles gloves]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

Yes cahoots, there is too much indication of communication between the three of you to make that a fair conclusion.
Ah the racist card comes out of the top pocket again. I have noticed you have also used the thread to attack Ozzy once again after he posted in a reasonable manner. What racist comment has he posted on this thread.
It is very significant that during a discussion on the behaviour to fellow members, you chuck in abuse to Mr Ozzy.
After your last spat with Mr Ozzy you stated the you regretted that it went too far. Those words are looking a bit hollow now don't you think.

This cahoot business is pure bullshit.

Last pm from Billy was in February.
Don't know him but probably do in the real world before SM with both of us been Poolies for years.

As for Mutley it's the odd WhatsApp message when he has his fone on to arrange a meet up for a few beers.

A probably know you from games decades ago.

I will accept your apology on here or through a PM.

[MutleyRules]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

Yes cahoots, there is too much indication of communication between the three of you to make that a fair conclusion.
Ah the racist card comes out of the top pocket again. I have noticed you have also used the thread to attack Ozzy once again after he posted in a reasonable manner. What racist comment has he posted on this thread.
It is very significant that during a discussion on the behaviour to fellow members, you chuck in abuse to Mr Ozzy.
After your last spat with Mr Ozzy you stated the you regretted that it went too far. Those words are looking a bit hollow now don't you think.

He hasn't said anything racist in this thread...I'm going on previous posts.
And he did have a dig at me in his post if you look closely.

[MutleyRules]

I don't think I've ever spoken to Billingham personally.

[MutleyRules]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

So anyone who challenges someone’s opinions is a ‘bully’…?

Do you want to fill the board with like minded people to yourself…?

Everyone to have the same opinion …a bit Orwellian…?

This board was never the Nirvana you paint it as, just because the wind was blowing your way, doesn’t make it right or wrong…it wasn’t ‘founded’ on any principle, it’s a message board supposedly of varying opinions…I don’t recall any Charter even if there was a Class system.

You are one of the biggest bullies on here to Jamie.

[MutleyRules]

there are posters you agree with and ones you do not. even if evry single one has a pop at you for a post your world aint going to end with your family. if you are not prepared to give out some stick or receive it then this place and others like it just aint for you. fact is you go to the vic and the hardest thing to find is a fan who reads this site never mind contributes.

Can you throw any light on the fact that there are 419 guests on here at the moment. I would suggest, politely of course, that some of these guests go to the Vic. I am too interested in what's going on to prattle on about message boards. But each to their own.

90% of those 'guests' aren't real.

[MutleyRules]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

Yes cahoots, there is too much indication of communication between the three of you to make that a fair conclusion.
Ah the racist card comes out of the top pocket again. I have noticed you have also used the thread to attack Ozzy once again after he posted in a reasonable manner. What racist comment has he posted on this thread.
It is very significant that during a discussion on the behaviour to fellow members, you chuck in abuse to Mr Ozzy.
After your last spat with Mr Ozzy you stated the you regretted that it went too far. Those words are looking a bit hollow now don't you think.

And still no mention by you of why the racist thread about Black Footballers playing for England is still allowed to be viewed on an Hartlepool United public forum.

[accrington fan]

there are posters you agree with and ones you do not. even if evry single one has a pop at you for a post your world aint going to end with your family. if you are not prepared to give out some stick or receive it then this place and others like it just aint for you. fact is you go to the vic and the hardest thing to find is a fan who reads this site never mind contributes.

Can you throw any light on the fact that there are 419 guests on here at the moment. I would suggest, politely of course, that some of these guests go to the Vic. I am too interested in what's going on to prattle on about message boards. But each to their own.

possibly out of that number there will be some looking for news and rumours plus a dew brackley fans being nosy. you do not roll up to the match and talk about messageboards but they do come up having a natter at half time. like at ll clubs that number is still a small amount of the total fanbase who post or read this.

[derwent]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

So anyone who challenges someone’s opinions is a ‘bully’…?

Do you want to fill the board with like minded people to yourself…?

Everyone to have the same opinion …a bit Orwellian…?

This board was never the Nirvana you paint it as, just because the wind was blowing your way, doesn’t make it right or wrong…it wasn’t ‘founded’ on any principle, it’s a message board supposedly of varying opinions…I don’t recall any Charter even if there was a Class system.

What fascinates me is Mutley's yearning for the bunker days of yore. He and his mates left the board in a hissy fit saying I was driving them away, although the other day he said half of them left because of the bunker's adoration of Boris, or words to that effect. The fact of the matter is he and those aggrieved mates formed another forum, so they were still all together in effect. So what is he moaning about, he still has the same posters to chinwag with.
You have to ask the question why did he come back. He came back as Dustin Gee not as Mutley, a sort of back door entry. He said he couldn't remember his password for Mutley but all he had to do was say, "hello everybody, I have joined as Dustin Gee but I'm actually Mutley. Is it possible for me to use my old username?" That's a route that solves the "lost" password problem. As Dustin Gee he continuously criticised the bunker as he still does, pining for the old bunker. So has something happened to this new forum, sometimes dubbed the secret cave. Has it moved into ever decreasing circles till it disappeared up it's own arsehole?? Why would you leave the wonderful bosom of your clique to face the storms and tempest of the bunker you hate and the moderator you hate. There is only one logical answer and that is to cause as much mayhem, mischief and division as you can to this hateful bunker and it's loathed moderator.
At a guess I would suggest that there were more posters in the immediate period prior to his back door return than there are now. Interesting.
People say the bunker is edging lower and lower but fail to point out who is actually lowering the tone. Who is the one who uses the racist card against fellow members and especially me? Who is the one who abuses people with his foul name calling, e.g. our loid guest who rips his silly rants to pieces. Then there is his treatment of Ozzy being two examples. Plus and it's a big plus his choice of profanities like K*** which certainly lowers the tone.
Subtlety is not his strong point, proved by the mess he made of trying to get the same PM as his two mates. "who by Telly Savalas, please send me a PM" I'm assuming he wanted me to fall for that and ask him the same question I asked the other two. Subtlety at it's lowest ebb. As me Grandad used to say, "he has as much subtlety as a herd of elephants charging down Stockton High St on Market Day"
He has been having a go at me for years now and the above is a few words in return.

[Snowy]

You are one of the biggest bullies on here to Jamie.

Oh dear…..You’re throwing the old ‘bully’ word at me because I question someone who ‘shares’ your view on politics …now find another poster I ‘bully’.
Then look up the meaning of ‘bully’….if it’s possible to ‘intimidate’ someone by arguing against his case. I must have failed badly, because he’s still active giving his ‘views on everything’ with gay abandon.
He was never bullied, he just didn’t like being challenged and played the victim .
He had a talent for misconstruing posts long, long before you returned.

[Splod]

The Bunker becomes less relevant the fewer posters we have. The reaction to phrases like 'RajPutin' doesn't endanger the Board, there are lots of people in the world called Raj. The debate does plummet to some pretty low depths sometimes but I just don't follow those threads. I'm afraid I side with freedom of speech on this occasion.

[derwent]

Right an explanation.
The chain of events.
Mutley came on here questioning the disappearance of Loyal_Fan. Followed by two comments from KPG and Billinghampoolie1908 respectfully. One relating to Keir2 and the other to Rajputin.
I PMd both asking them if those remarks were referring to me. Then Mutley posted asking for a Pm please. I duly answered him, as he has explained, with Hello. I had no relevant question for him so Hello, in my opinion, was sufficient. I asked both both Kpg and Billy in a polite manner, as you all can read, to answer my question. Mutley tried to make a big thing of it but when someone asks please can I have a PM, what sort of answer could be given, so I plumped for Hello, a nice respectful answer. Billy came on and said he had received something similar, which in fact is completely wrong. What he got was a question asking him if his post of Raj Putin was referring to me.
At exactly 8-14 this evening I received an answer to my questions. KPG said yes he was referring to me, whereas Billy said he was referring to our great leader (his words).
I was appalled and affronted to be aligned with the incompetent Starmer, although I admire KPG to a certain extent for at least owning up to it but I am not prepared to accept being aligned to Putin, a World recognised Warmonger and mass murderer and I have no doubt Raj will have the same view should he get wind of it. Billy says he was relating to Raj which in itself could put the bunker and it's owner at risk. How many times have we to stress the importance of not posting anything that could instigate litigation and yet still we have this sort of behaviour. Not only is it childish but downright irresponsible. The least Billy can do is take responsibility for his behaviour and apologise or at least recognise his recklessness and request the removal of his post. KPG's post was harmless although insulting and it was intended to insult but my skin is made out of Rhino hide.
There are too many co-incidences here to rule out that Mutley, KPG and Billy are in cahoots here but we'll leave it at that. I am not the only one to arrive at that conclusion.
As Moderator I have to make decisions on various situations and decisions and inevitably that will involve warnings or, using the modern vernacular, the issue of yellow cards. It has to be said yellow cards are a rarity on here as are bans. I have issued two yellow cards recently which have been ignored. When people question the end result they usually refer to a particular incident asking the question, "getting banned for that" when indeed it is not only "that" but also what went before "that". During this period of events I have relayed the why's and wherefores to the forum's owner.
I believe in freedom of speech but on here abuse of fellow members is not acceptable.
I am not here to win a popularity contest, I'm here to protect the forum, it's owner and you, its members.

Me, Billy and KPG in cahoots??
And no mention of the 'Black footballers should never have and never should play for England' that's allowed to stay on a public Hartlepool United Message Board from the Bunker's No.1 Moderator. Sickening.

Yes cahoots, there is too much indication of communication between the three of you to make that a fair conclusion.
Ah the racist card comes out of the top pocket again. I have noticed you have also used the thread to attack Ozzy once again after he posted in a reasonable manner. What racist comment has he posted on this thread.
It is very significant that during a discussion on the behaviour to fellow members, you chuck in abuse to Mr Ozzy.
After your last spat with Mr Ozzy you stated the you regretted that it went too far. Those words are looking a bit hollow now don't you think.

This cahoot business is pure bullshit.

Last pm from Billy was in February.
Don't know him but probably do in the real world before SM with both of us been Poolies for years.

As for Mutley it's the odd WhatsApp message when he has his fone on to arrange a meet up for a few beers.

A probably know you from games decades ago. on the vert

I will accept your apology on here or through a PM.

Communication was actually made on this thread if you care to read it properly. Mutley actually asked the pair of you if you had received the same hello as him. A communication in broad daylight in the very same thread as you claim there was none. I think that piece of broad raw evidence will suffice.
Are you also going to tell me that Mutley's comment of "decent screenshots by the way" weren't communicated by one or both of you.
If you look closely I never mentioned the communication was by PM.
As for apologising there would be no conversation regarding this if you hadn't written, Keir2. I won't call for an apology from you as I wouldn't see any value in it.

[Stocksfield_Poolie]

Using the phrase '***Putin' could put this board in danger, especially after the letter sent to Mr I.
So I support derwent in this case.
But I don't believe Jamie should be banned for a month, a lot of people will miss his posts.

[derwent]

The Bunker becomes less relevant the fewer posters we have. The reaction to phrases like 'RajPutin' doesn't endanger the Board, there are lots of people in the world called Raj. The debate does plummet to some pretty low depths sometimes but I just don't follow those threads. I'm afraid I side with freedom of speech on this occasion.

I think you've forgotten that when I asked him if he was referring to me he replied "I was referring to our great leader"
I think that is fairly clear.

I'll remind everybody once more, if anybody sees their way forward is to accuse someone else of libel then if it can't be resolved amicably it goes to High Court. That means Barristers and as Mr I said in his address to the nation after we received "the letter" that ain't cheap and he pointed out that if he was the one held responsible for, as owner of the site, to be allowing the libel, he would face charges along with the member responsible for the post being challenged.
We are talking about the man who owns the site and provides us, the members, free access to it. having to potentially hand over thousands of pounds just because someone on here hasn't the brains he was born with. That's the law's interpretation of free speech as it sees fit.
You are free to drive your car but there are rules as to how you go about it.
Would anybody on here actually be prepared to run the risk of putting Mr I at risk just to be able to get his frustrations or anger off his chest. I would hope the answer would be a resounding NOOOOO.
SO DON'T DO IT.......................please.

[MutleyRules]

He was always pessimistic but everyone has a right to an opinion but probably got pi**ed off by a couple of the Bunker Bullies.

That's it Jamie, you are banned for a month. If you appear on here as any other username you will be banned permanently, along with all known usernames.

Unbelievable this place now. Jamie1952 getting a 1 month ban for stating there is a couple of bullies on here....of which there is plenty btw. But still up for all to see is a post stating that anyone black should not and should never have played for England. And people on here go on about 2 tier this and 2 tier that.
The Bunker was not founded on shit like that...no wonder there's only half a dozen people who post regularly now.
BTW derwent...hilarious PM reply that just said 'hello'....side splitting.

So anyone who challenges someone’s opinions is a ‘bully’…?

Do you want to fill the board with like minded people to yourself…?

Everyone to have the same opinion …a bit Orwellian…?

This board was never the Nirvana you paint it as, just because the wind was blowing your way, doesn’t make it right or wrong…it wasn’t ‘founded’ on any principle, it’s a message board supposedly of varying opinions…I don’t recall any Charter even if there was a Class system.

What fascinates me is Mutley's yearning for the bunker days of yore. He and his mates left the board in a hissy fit saying I was driving them away, although the other day he said half of them left because of the bunker's adoration of Boris, or words to that effect. The fact of the matter is he and those aggrieved mates formed another forum, so they were still all together in effect. So what is he moaning about, he still has the same posters to chinwag with.
You have to ask the question why did he come back. He came back as Dustin Gee not as Mutley, a sort of back door entry. He said he couldn't remember his password for Mutley but all he had to do was say, "hello everybody, I have joined as Dustin Gee but I'm actually Mutley. Is it possible for me to use my old username?" That's a route that solves the "lost" password problem. As Dustin Gee he continuously criticised the bunker as he still does, pining for the old bunker. So has something happened to this new forum, sometimes dubbed the secret cave. Has it moved into ever decreasing circles till it disappeared up it's own arsehole?? Why would you leave the wonderful bosom of your clique to face the storms and tempest of the bunker you hate and the moderator you hate. There is only one logical answer and that is to cause as much mayhem, mischief and division as you can to this hateful bunker and it's loathed moderator.
At a guess I would suggest that there were more posters in the immediate period prior to his back door return than there are now. Interesting.
People say the bunker is edging lower and lower but fail to point out who is actually lowering the tone. Who is the one who uses the racist card against fellow members and especially me? Who is the one who abuses people with his foul name calling, e.g. our loid guest who rips his silly rants to pieces. Then there is his treatment of Ozzy being two examples. Plus and it's a big plus his choice of profanities like K*** which certainly lowers the tone.
Subtlety is not his strong point, proved by the mess he made of trying to get the same PM as his two mates. "who by Telly Savalas, please send me a PM" I'm assuming he wanted me to fall for that and ask him the same question I asked the other two. Subtlety at it's lowest ebb. As me Grandad used to say, "he has as much subtlety as a herd of elephants charging down Stockton High St on Market Day"
He has been having a go at me for years now and the above is a few words in return.

You don't half talk some waffle.

[MutleyRules]

You are one of the biggest bullies on here to Jamie.

Oh dear…..You’re throwing the old ‘bully’ word at me because I question someone who ‘shares’ your view on politics …now find another poster I ‘bully’.
Then look up the meaning of ‘bully’….if it’s possible to ‘intimidate’ someone by arguing against his case. I must have failed badly, because he’s still active giving his ‘views on everything’ with gay abandon.
He was never bullied, he just didn’t like being challenged and played the victim .
He had a talent for misconstruing posts long, long before you returned.

It's there for all to see.

[MutleyRules]

The Bunker becomes less relevant the fewer posters we have. The reaction to phrases like 'RajPutin' doesn't endanger the Board, there are lots of people in the world called Raj. The debate does plummet to some pretty low depths sometimes but I just don't follow those threads. I'm afraid I side with freedom of speech on this occasion.

I think you've forgotten that when I asked him if he was referring to me he replied "I was referring to our great leader"
I think that is fairly clear.

I'll remind everybody once more, if anybody sees their way forward is to accuse someone else of libel then if it can't be resolved amicably it goes to High Court. That means Barristers and as Mr I said in his address to the nation after we received "the letter" that ain't cheap and he pointed out that if he was the one held responsible for, as owner of the site, to be allowing the libel, he would face charges along with the member responsible for the post being challenged.
We are talking about the man who owns the site and provides us, the members, free access to it. having to potentially hand over thousands of pounds just because someone on here hasn't the brains he was born with. That's the law's interpretation of free speech as it sees fit.
You are free to drive your car but there are rules as to how you go about it.
Would anybody on here actually be prepared to run the risk of putting Mr I at risk just to be able to get his frustrations or anger off his chest. I would hope the answer would be a resounding NOOOOO.
SO DON'T DO IT.......................please.

Address to the Nation.

[derwent]

Using the phrase '***Putin' could put this board in danger, especially after the letter sent to Mr I.
So I support derwent in this case.
But I don't believe Jamie should be banned for a month, a lot of people will miss his posts.

I appreciate your support but Jamie has been banned before, originally for good, but reduced to 7 days after assuring us he would not give us any reason for being up before the beak, as it were, ever again.
I tried to warn him he was in danger but he chose to ignore me and telling me he didn't like being threatened. I suppose a warning could be termed as a threat but it is my job to judge whether a warning is necessary, whether it is accepted with true grace and whether further reason is evident. The bunker is a gift to us to communicate with each other and is not there to be shot at or accused of being something it is not.
A full ban was consider but reduced to a month to give him another chance.
This is not something that happens every time someone opens their mouth and, in truth, is very rare.
Moderating is not easy and no one wants to ban or suspend anybody and nobody wants to see banning orders amongst the membership, apart from those who consider themselves to be racist police and see their point of view unchallengable.
It is impossible to please all of the people all of the time.
I take note of your point of view Mr Stocksfield.

[derwent]

You are one of the biggest bullies on here to Jamie.

Oh dear…..You’re throwing the old ‘bully’ word at me because I question someone who ‘shares’ your view on politics …now find another poster I ‘bully’.
Then look up the meaning of ‘bully’….if it’s possible to ‘intimidate’ someone by arguing against his case. I must have failed badly, because he’s still active giving his ‘views on everything’ with gay abandon.
He was never bullied, he just didn’t like being challenged and played the victim .
He had a talent for misconstruing posts long, long before you returned.

It's there for all to see.

Well I don't see it, Jamie has openly admitted to coming on here to wind people up which is the same as to annoy people in my book.
Remember the thread where he actually owned up to it and I asked him to curb it and got a smart arse reply which prompted you to say something like "finds comfy chair and reaches for the popcorn" and I said sorry to disappoint you, I've said what I want to say, it's up to him now. How many times has Jamie accused Snowy of being envious of him or his response was you're just jealous. The decision wasn't taken lightly and he's got another chance. Will he take it, we'll see.