MutleyRules wrote:Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
It was allover the News at the time.
But no one was prosecuted, a tree is a tree.
MutleyRules wrote:Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
It was allover the News at the time.
Jamie1952 wrote:MutleyRules wrote:Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
It was allover the News at the time.
But no one was prosecuted, a tree is a tree.
Jamie1952 wrote:MutleyRules wrote:Jamie1952 wrote:This didn’t get much publicity, the oak tree was 500 years old ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgypewepno
It was allover the News at the time.
But no one was prosecuted, a tree is a tree.
accrington fan wrote:not a tree but locally there as been some so called artwork vandalised up penistone hill in haworth thats been placed there for the bradford city of culture. the vast majority of the locals hate it and the idea of it as its been pushed on us with no consultation. now they have vast security around the place but never would have or has haved for vandalism to local residents property and allotments that happens.
Snowy wrote:accrington fan wrote:not a tree but locally there as been some so called artwork vandalised up penistone hill in haworth thats been placed there for the bradford city of culture. the vast majority of the locals hate it and the idea of it as its been pushed on us with no consultation. now they have vast security around the place but never would have or has haved for vandalism to local residents property and allotments that happens.
Ah, the butterfly’s….they look like debris from an exploded cast iron boiler explosion….or illegal fly tipping of scrap..
Mind you there’s always someone who’ll think it’s wonderful.
accrington fan wrote:
funny you mention fly tipping as someone i met thought it was just that. one thing about northerners is you cant fool em by arty farty bullshit and can be wondering what the local councillors are getting out of it especially with them all coming out with the same thing and not a single dissenter.
Kenny Bottles wrote:accrington fan wrote:
funny you mention fly tipping as someone i met thought it was just that. one thing about northerners is you cant fool em by arty farty bullshit and can be wondering what the local councillors are getting out of it especially with them all coming out with the same thing and not a single dissenter.
The factory-fitted bullshit detector that I have as a Northerner is the finest gift a man could ever desire.
It's like the front of a snow plough as it rapidly clears the shite out of the way on the highway to happiness and contentment.
Without it, I'd be a gibbering wreck of a man...
accrington fan wrote:Kenny Bottles wrote:accrington fan wrote:
funny you mention fly tipping as someone i met thought it was just that. one thing about northerners is you cant fool em by arty farty bullshit and can be wondering what the local councillors are getting out of it especially with them all coming out with the same thing and not a single dissenter.
The factory-fitted bullshit detector that I have as a Northerner is the finest gift a man could ever desire.
It's like the front of a snow plough as it rapidly clears the shite out of the way on the highway to happiness and contentment.
Without it, I'd be a gibbering wreck of a man...
or someone born within the sound of the westminster parliament. feel this is why a lot of southerners do not like us and accuse us of having a sack of king edwards on our shoulders. we see it when it happens but it takes them months to smell their flat whites.
Jamie1952 wrote:Deleted I don’t want to upset Snowy, he got in first damn it !
Snowy wrote:Jamie1952 wrote:Deleted I don’t want to upset Snowy, he got in first damn it !
Not a problem Jamie, might as well used the original posting…I’d forgotten all about it.
Might as well post what you deleted.
PTID wrote:And you've hit the nail on the head, why is this case particularly bad? It's purely subjective when criminality is quite objective the rules are the rules.
Imo the vandalism of works of art and national treasures was far worse than chopping down this tree, Churchills statue being vandalised being a case in point.
Smokin Joe wrote:I absolutely get where you are coming from Ozzy and fully appreciate that this incident caused distress to many people. However, at the end of the day it's still a tree. It will be interesting therefore to see what kind of sentence Newcastle Crown Court dishes out to similar local lowlife who are found guilty of acts of vandalism that result in serious mental or physical injury (or worse) to human victims over the forthcoming months.
Snowy wrote:Four years and 3 months each.
Snowy wrote:I suspect if it was located somewhere else or hadn’t featured in a film no one would have given a toss.
Did they ever give a reason…?
Smokin Joe wrote:I absolutely get where you are coming from Ozzy and fully appreciate that this incident caused distress to many people. However, at the end of the day it's still a tree. It will be interesting therefore to see what kind of sentence Newcastle Crown Court dishes out to similar local lowlife who are found guilty of acts of vandalism that result in serious mental or physical injury (or worse) to human victims over the forthcoming months.
PTID wrote:I just can't get my head around the fact that you get over 4 years for cutting down a tree but the scroats who commit burglary and carnage in people's homes get community service if the police can be arsed to find them and prosecute.
Weird justice?
Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:I just can't get my head around the fact that you get over 4 years for cutting down a tree but the scroats who commit burglary and carnage in people's homes get community service if the police can be arsed to find them and prosecute.
Weird justice?
Because you aren't engaging brain. Imagine it was just a pike of stones with some names on it that was damaged or a cenotaph in other words. Its fine for things to not be important to you personally but that doesn't mean they are not important full stop.
PTID wrote:I just can't get my head around the fact that you get over 4 years for cutting down a tree but the scroats who commit burglary and carnage in people's homes get community service if the police can be arsed to find them and prosecute.
Weird justice?
PTID wrote:I just can't get my head around the fact that you get over 4 years for cutting down a tree but the scroats who commit burglary and carnage in people's homes get community service if the police can be arsed to find them and prosecute.
Weird justice?
Smokin Joe wrote:And yet the 100% woke Beeb sack a MasterChef presenter over an alleged racist comment that he supposedly made 7 years back. As someone mentioned earlier the UK is seriously broken and it would be no surprise if a Civil War of some kind broke out within the next 5 years.
Smokin Joe wrote:And yet the 100% woke Beeb sack a MasterChef presenter over an alleged racist comment that he supposedly made 7 years back. As someone mentioned earlier the UK is seriously broken and it would be no surprise if a Civil War of some kind broke out within the next 5 years.
Snowy wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:I just can't get my head around the fact that you get over 4 years for cutting down a tree but the scroats who commit burglary and carnage in people's homes get community service if the police can be arsed to find them and prosecute.
Weird justice?
Because you aren't engaging brain. Imagine it was just a pike of stones with some names on it that was damaged or a cenotaph in other words. Its fine for things to not be important to you personally but that doesn't mean they are not important full stop.
It’s a tree that was in a film, otherwise they’d have got a non custodial sentence…hardly comparable with a cenotaph.
I’d have given five years for there faces.
PTID wrote:I know that's my perspective, and you give yours that's how a forum works. Maybe engage brain before typing next time.
PTID wrote:But it's still opinions on a forum and I think you'll find there's plenty who think the sentencing of these 2 is massively disproportionate to the crime, equally there's plenty who would have given them more.
Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:But it's still opinions on a forum and I think you'll find there's plenty who think the sentencing of these 2 is massively disproportionate to the crime, equally there's plenty who would have given them more.
Just because other crimes saw daft sentences being given out doesnt mean they didnt get this one spot on.
Ozzy Saltburn wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:But it's still opinions on a forum and I think you'll find there's plenty who think the sentencing of these 2 is massively disproportionate to the crime, equally there's plenty who would have given them more.
Just because other crimes saw daft sentences being given out doesnt mean they didnt get this one spot on.
I may be mistaken but I believe this is the third time I have agreed with you.
Pooly_Imp wrote:PTID wrote:But it's still opinions on a forum and I think you'll find there's plenty who think the sentencing of these 2 is massively disproportionate to the crime, equally there's plenty who would have given them more.
Just because other crimes saw daft sentences being given out doesnt mean they didnt get this one spot on.
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: Corner Flag, garthwd, Ozzy Saltburn, Poolie27 and 446 guests