bobby lemonade wrote:Signs for an undisclosed fee.
bobby lemonade wrote:Been playing in world cup qualifiers for Grenada as well.
Grayhoundend wrote:Folarin £1
bobby lemonade wrote:Been playing in world cup qualifiers for Grenada as well.
derwent wrote:Grayson seems to be going about his business of building a team. Bit still to go but recruiting steadily now.
I have no idea what his opinion of using the loan market but it is pretty certain he'll have his contacts.
A Cleary, Kemp and Armstrong would be nice.
Snowy wrote:Grayhoundend wrote:Folarin £1
Paid in monthly instalment paid over 5 years
MutleyRules wrote:People seem to be getting excited over a player who scored against Pools last season. I could have scored against Pools last season.![]()
Probably get a double hatrick this season.![]()
MutleyRules wrote:People seem to be getting excited over a player who scored against Pools last season. I could have scored against Pools last season.![]()
Probably get a double hatrick this season.![]()
Pooly_Imp wrote:MutleyRules wrote:People seem to be getting excited over a player who scored against Pools last season. I could have scored against Pools last season.![]()
Probably get a double hatrick this season.![]()
People have to get some perspective. These are boggo NL signings. Steady away. They need to reread their cringey excited comments from summers gone by about signings that turned out to be bang average.
PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
kevin pooles gloves wrote:PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
Ya could say the 9 points shortage would of been 18 without Clearly.
No point in dressing up failure.
Only solution to end this shit is a change in the Big Chair.
WSO
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:kevin pooles gloves wrote:PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
Ya could say the 9 points shortage would of been 18 without Clearly.
No point in dressing up failure.
Only solution to end this shit is a change in the Big Chair.
WSO
We conceded 5 at York withouth them getting out of second gear Gateshead 4 barnet rolled us over at their place quite comfortably. The mighty ebbsfleet should of had 4 points off us. 9 points behind the play offs might as well of been 90, especially as 1/3rd of the division gets in them This squad is now way weaker granted with a few weeks of friendlies but like many have said if we stay up next season it will be a success now. Sad but it will.
I have no faith in the guy picking these players that he is going to get much right but a lot seem to forget this and miraculously think things are going to improve.
The season was dead in the water the minute we all realised raj was going nowhere and that no matter what's said the takeover ain't happening anytime soon if ever. Even if grayson produces miracles raj will piss him off.
Snowy wrote:Is this the standard of player we are bringing in that will get us promotion… ?
Is this a team for mid table stability…?
PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
Mikey wrote:PTID wrote:On the other hand it needs to be remembered that we don't need a massive improvement to reach a play off place, what were we 9 pints short or so, 3 wins - keeping 11 players on the pitch, a little more adventure during LLs tenure, would have possibly been enough?
We've got a proper RWB which we haven't had since Dodds injury. A new proven goalscorer. Both coming from higher levels, so not bog standard NL players. A pacy winger makes a huge difference at this level, not saying we've signed a new Cleary but at least we're addressing weaknesses.
Not saying we're going to do anything, just pointing out that last seasons efforts didn't leave us very far short of a play off position. 3 managers, 3 very different approaches and sets of tactics, maybe if Grayson can manage a full season (a big ask) he can eke out that small improvement that could make a difference?
Time will tell.
Very positive in your outlook here. However
Though we were only 9 points off the playoffs we were actually closer to relegation. (8 points.)
Just saying like.
Kettering Poolie wrote:I would just like the manager to last the WHOLE season![]()
Apologies in advance, for being controversial!
billinghampoolie1908 wrote:Pooly_Imp wrote:MutleyRules wrote:People seem to be getting excited over a player who scored against Pools last season. I could have scored against Pools last season.![]()
Probably get a double hatrick this season.![]()
People have to get some perspective. These are boggo NL signings. Steady away. They need to reread their cringey excited comments from summers gone by about signings that turned out to be bang average.
Some are going on like we have signed a world beater, he has come from the mighty barnet who loaned him out to Braintree, granted he did ok at Braintree. Pools fans don't seem to learn the lesson they bull these players up expecting great things and like you say they are just bog standard national league players.
kevin pooles gloves wrote:Snowy wrote:Is this the standard of player we are bringing in that will get us promotion… ?
Is this a team for mid table stability…?
Bottom 5.
Mickey Barron ain't daft.
Grayhoundend wrote:kevin pooles gloves wrote:Snowy wrote:Is this the standard of player we are bringing in that will get us promotion… ?
Is this a team for mid table stability…?
Bottom 5.
Mickey Barron ain't daft.
Yes he is![]()
![]()
kevin pooles gloves wrote:Grayhoundend wrote:kevin pooles gloves wrote:Snowy wrote:Is this the standard of player we are bringing in that will get us promotion… ?
Is this a team for mid table stability…?
Bottom 5.
Mickey Barron ain't daft.
Yes he is![]()
![]()
Oh no he isent![]()
![]()
Return to The Ripper & Monkeybutt Forum
Dodgepots browsing this forum: kevin pooles gloves, MutleyRules, PTID, swedpool5157 and 576 guests