Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sun Jun 08, 2025 6:58 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
chip fireball wrote:
durhams game looks guaranteed to reach a quick conclusion. kent are 6 wickets down already and that includes a rain delay and lunch.


Aye, it's the top six too.

Get Jones out and they've a great chance to wrap these up for less than 150.

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
chip fireball wrote:
lets hope for more rain.

Fook that; let's have the hailstorm of the century!

Not that I really care about Durham cricket me like.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:19 pm 
Have you been Chip?? :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Last bloody wicket. banghead

That's all they have to get. :roll:

147 for 9 and now they're 176 for 9. :evil:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:35 pm 
They should have bowled at his nads 29 runs ago.

Line and length. :wink:

Like Saturday nights in the Gem. :sweeeet:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Billingham
208 for 9 now :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:46 pm 
Has Chip been though?? :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Meanwhile in the 20/20 South Africa need 55 off the last 5 and a half overs to put England out of their misery before their last match!

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:56 pm 
Are you at that, Ken?? :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Pooliekev wrote:
Are you at that, Ken?? :grin: :grin:


rolfl

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
MadJohn wrote:
Mr Ripper wrote:
Meanwhile in the 20/20 South Africa need 55 off the last 5 and a half overs to put England out of their misery before their last match!


And one crap Jacob Oram over later, they need 22 of 18 balls. Game over.


12 off 12 required now. :evil:

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:08 pm 
Are you at that MJ?? :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Pooliekev wrote:
Are you at that MJ?? :grin:


rolfl

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:25 pm 
MadJohn wrote:
And yes Kev, I was indeed in Durban. I am now back in Canterbury :sweeeet:


Well done mate, excellent support. :grin: :grin:

Can we have a blow by blow account?? :shock: :shock:

Only it's not the same when you aren't there. :grin: :grin:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Billingham
Latest scores :

Surrey 302 for 5 vs Lancashire
Durham 28 for 1 vs Kent (212 all out)
Yorkshire 150 for 6 vs Hampshire
Sussex 262 for 4 vs Worces.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Billingham
Latest scores :

Surrey 365 for 6 vs Lancashire - bad light stopped play
Durham 86 for 3 vs Kent (212 all out)
Yorkshire 161 for 7 vs Hampshire - rain stopped play
Sussex 287 for 4 vs Worces. - bad light stopped play


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Billingham
Durham 126 for 4 at close of play.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:40 pm 
That was unbelievable hitting :shock:

The poor lad only bowled one bad ball, and that was a very difficult ball to hit for six a full toss outside off stump.

Whatever Flintoff said to him at the end the 18th over shouldn't have been said in hindsight, and almost inevitably Mascanenhas hit five sixes in row only a couple of weeks ago off the bowling of........ Yuvraj Singh :laugh: Step forward Mr Mascenenhas!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:18 pm 
chip fireball wrote:
ramprakash is closing in on 2000, yes thats right 2000 county championship runs this season. he had 1700 before today.

on top of that he has been superb in every one day/ 20/20 game ive seen him in this season. any idea why he isnt playing for a crap england team mr mad john ?


He's far too nervous. Usually pukes before big games and when he was selected, the dressing room at the time had a 'prove yourself' attitude, whereas now, when selected all the other guys build you up.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:22 pm 
Have you been Chip?? :sweeeet:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:20 am
Posts: 18484
Location: Up Jack's Arse in America
Pooliekev wrote:
Have you been Chip?? :sweeeet:


rolfl

_________________
Deep down inside you know I'm always right

NOTE: Any statements made by me are, for the avoidance of doubt and arseyness, my opinion and not necessarily absolute fact nor are they necessarily shared by the people who own and run this board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:45 am 
Can't tell you what we've got here. :sweeeet:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:18 am 
MadJohn wrote:
Correction: make that 17 wickets in 2 days. Hick's out. Sussex are looking very strong favourites to me, unless it rains.


I agree; I can't see a relegated side holding out for two days. Remember as well, that they bowl more overs in the County Championship. Two full days equate to the same number of overs of half a test match!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
Kent are dead and buried aren't they. This match won't get past teatime, perhaps not even lunch.

Then bring on the rain over the sarf!

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
All out 160. 52 to win.

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:58 am 
Worcester 6 down. The light is bad there, but they've got the spinners on!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 16992
Location: The people's democratic illegal republic of Catalonia
Karl Marx wrote:
The light is bad there!

Nimbus clouds? Image

_________________
No, your children are not the special ones.
(Nor is your dog.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:20 pm 
Durham have won.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:22 pm 
Karl Marx wrote:
Worcester 6 down. The light is bad there, but they've got the spinners on!


Sorry, only 4 down! Still over 200 needed to avoid the follow on. The light has improved as well!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:27 pm 
Karl Marx wrote:
Karl Marx wrote:
Worcester 6 down. The light is bad there, but they've got the spinners on!


Sorry, only 4 down! Still over 200 needed to avoid the follow on. The light has improved as well!


Worcester 171-5. Game over if you ask me.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:02 pm 
MadJohn wrote:
Mushtaq is running through the Worcester line-up like, well, like a quality spinner through a bunch of county labourers.

He's got six, Worcs are eight down, still a day and a half to go, give them the medals.

Congrats to Durham on a great season, and a runners-up spot confised


Also, Mushtaq has now taken more wickets this season than Gibson. sadx


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 981
Location: Smythe Mansions
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A27130042

_________________
BABY BABY BABY!!
Cum On Feeeeel The Noize Pooliez!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: cricket
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:48 pm 
it was a bloody close run thing though wasn't it?
Lancs nearly pulled it off!


I cant stand that Adams bloke down at Sussex, properly gives me violent tendencies he does


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bosh85, charlesI, charltonclive, Jamie1952, Snailwood2, Snowy and 106 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.