Reform Professionals

derwent · **Joined:** Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm **Posts:** 12320

Pooly_Imp wrote:

Snowy wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

Snowy wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

Hope he does keep travelling, much to the dismay of misguided isolationists. We punch above our weight relevance-wise to our credit and to our benefit. This is the way to keep it going. The last government wasn't wrong in every little thing it did, neither is this one nor will any other that one day may come to power.

I hope he keeps travelling too…in a straight line to infinity and beyond….never to return.

Weird. I'm not fussed myself. Tories were epically shit. Maybe my expectations have took a battering.

You must have low expectations and be happy with mediocrity.
Whatever floats your boat.

Happy?

Incidentally, the same people telling me off for complaining about Raj are having a right turbo moan-fest about Starmer. They can't budge him either!

When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend.

PTID · **Joined:** Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm **Posts:** 3853

How touchy? People telling me off, don't you mean posting an alternative viewpoint?

accrington fan · **Joined:** Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm **Posts:** 18762

Ozzy Saltburn wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

Snowy wrote:

We have governments who are totally out of touch with the general public.
They public live on practicalities, they live on theory’s based on dreams.

The public live on rumours, conspiracy theories and other BS. You've seen it yourself.

If we actually had governments that considered the truth to be more important than spin and politicking, there would be consiiderably less "conspiracy theories and other BS". Johnson was a liar but Starmers blatant and routine disregard for the truth is frankly, sinister.

its bad enough having PM who lie, but its made worse by the situation of elected MP of their party losing the whip if they say anything or act against their wishes in a vote. more or less you voted for somebody who have had their wings clipped therefore cannot represent you.

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

PTID wrote:

How touchy? People telling me off, don't you mean posting an alternative viewpoint?

If by alternative viewpoint you mean wanting to stifle certain viewpoints then yes. How's your mate,? Raj that is.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:48 am

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

I'll bet anyone* on here that trump and farage won't win their next elections £100 to their or my chosen charity.
If one wins and one loses it'll be £50 I donate.

*a maximum of five people

Got your doubts eh. (5 people only) :laugh:

I don’t care who wins, providing the Conservatives, Labour and the Lib Dem’s run by Postman Twat don’t get a sniff of running the country.

I'm not a betting man but I'm willing to put up £500 for charity.
You up for the bet??
Thought not.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36238

MutleyRules wrote:

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

I'll bet anyone* on here that trump and farage won't win their next elections £100 to their or my chosen charity.
If one wins and one loses it'll be £50 I donate.

*a maximum of five people

Got your doubts eh. (5 people only) :laugh:

I don’t care who wins, providing the Conservatives, Labour and the Lib Dem’s run by Postman Twat don’t get a sniff of running the country.

I'm not a betting man but I'm willing to put up £500 for charity.
You up for the bet??
Thought not.

Never bet in my life, ain’t dumb enough to start now.

But out of interest, I’ll do you a favour before someone takes you up on the offer….Trump definitely won’t win, he won’t be allowed to, you can only have two terms as President :laugh:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:39 pm

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

I'll bet anyone* on here that trump and farage won't win their next elections £100 to their or my chosen charity.
If one wins and one loses it'll be £50 I donate.

*a maximum of five people

Got your doubts eh. (5 people only) :laugh:

I don’t care who wins, providing the Conservatives, Labour and the Lib Dem’s run by Postman Twat don’t get a sniff of running the country.

I'm not a betting man but I'm willing to put up £500 for charity.
You up for the bet??
Thought not.

Never bet in my life, ain’t dumb enough to start now.

But out of interest, I’ll do you a favour before someone takes you up on the offer….Trump definitely won’t win, he won’t be allowed to, you can only have two terms as President :laugh:

Try reading the full thread...that's already been addressed.

PTID · **Joined:** Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm **Posts:** 3853

Pooly_Imp wrote:

PTID wrote:

How touchy? People telling me off, don't you mean posting an alternative viewpoint?

If by alternative viewpoint you mean wanting to stifle certain viewpoints then yes. How's your mate,? Raj that is.[/quote

Ha ha definitely touchy!!

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

PTID wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

PTID wrote:

How touchy? People telling me off, don't you mean posting an alternative viewpoint?

If by alternative viewpoint you mean wanting to stifle certain viewpoints then yes. How's your mate,? Raj that is.[/quote

Ha ha definitely touchy!!

He's touchy? Perhaps take a chaperone next time you see him.

derwent · **Joined:** Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm **Posts:** 12320

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36238

MutleyRules wrote:

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

Snowy wrote:

MutleyRules wrote:

I'll bet anyone* on here that trump and farage won't win their next elections £100 to their or my chosen charity.
If one wins and one loses it'll be £50 I donate.

*a maximum of five people

Got your doubts eh. (5 people only) :laugh:

I don’t care who wins, providing the Conservatives, Labour and the Lib Dem’s run by Postman Twat don’t get a sniff of running the country.

I'm not a betting man but I'm willing to put up £500 for charity.
You up for the bet??
Thought not.

Never bet in my life, ain’t dumb enough to start now.

But out of interest, I’ll do you a favour before someone takes you up on the offer….Trump definitely won’t win, he won’t be allowed to, you can only have two terms as President :laugh:

Try reading the full thread...that's already been addressed.

I have, you didn’t address anything…simply made a sarcy crack comparing Trump with Putin and changing the rules to suit himself.

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36238

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

Never took you for a fan of old Starmer …. :laugh:

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

Snowy wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

Never took you for a fan of old Starmer …. :laugh:

I'm not a fan of utter bollocks which rules out any politician.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36238

Good, you found the antidote in your medicine cupboard just in time….my daily dose of cynicism every morning is what keeps me going. :laugh:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:53 am

I have, you didn’t address anything…simply made a sarcy crack comparing Trump with Putin and changing the rules to suit himself.

[/quote]
I know.

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36238

MutleyRules wrote:

I have, you didn’t address anything…simply made a sarcy crack comparing Trump with Putin and changing the rules to suit himself.

I know.

[/quote]
I rest my case M’Lud….. :laugh:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:20 am

accrington fan · **Joined:** Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm **Posts:** 18762

Pooly_Imp wrote:

PTID wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

PTID wrote:

How touchy? People telling me off, don't you mean posting an alternative viewpoint?

If by alternative viewpoint you mean wanting to stifle certain viewpoints then yes. How's your mate,? Raj that is.[/quote

Ha ha definitely touchy!!

He's touchy? Perhaps take a chaperone next time you see him.

does he have a few of those as i have never seen him entering the vic.

derwent · **Joined:** Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm **Posts:** 12320

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

The fact still remains that it is possible to vote Starmer out, whereas there is no voting platform to get Raj out.

One is a fixture until he decides to go and the other is subject to the whims and wishes of the electorate. I don't need to form any new party to get him out, he's doing the job for us.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 24, 2025 2:43 pm

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

The fact still remains that it is possible to vote Starmer out, whereas there is no voting platform to get Raj out.

One is a fixture until he decides to go and the other is subject to the whims and wishes of the electorate. I don't need to form any new party to get him out, he's doing the job for us.

You can vote with your feet to get raj out. If enough people done it he'd be gone.

Pooly_Imp · **Joined:** Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm **Posts:** 2514

MutleyRules wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

The fact still remains that it is possible to vote Starmer out, whereas there is no voting platform to get Raj out.

One is a fixture until he decides to go and the other is subject to the whims and wishes of the electorate. I don't need to form any new party to get him out, he's doing the job for us.

You can vote with your feet to get raj out. If enough people done it he'd be gone.

Amen.

PTID · **Joined:** Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm **Posts:** 3853

Maybe not enough willing to vote with their feet unless there's a viable alternative waiting in the wings?

derwent · **Joined:** Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm **Posts:** 12320

MutleyRules wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

derwent wrote:

Pooly_Imp wrote:

"When Raj takes £300 out of me back pocket, without my agreement, he'll get it don't you fret.
We can vote Starmer out but Raj stays until he decides to go.
Your comparison technique needs adjusting my friend."

Sounds just like Raj, promising the world, serving up shit.

Plus how is your drop in the ocean vote going to oust Labour? I can't do it either.

Sounds like a good comparison after all.

Where did I say that it would only take my vote?????
The difference between Starmer and Raj is, one can stay as long as he likes and the other is the decision of the electorate, that is why I said we can vote him out. You can either see that or you can't....you decide.
If you can get Raj voted out then I suggest you get on with it. Good luck.

Good luck getting Starmer out. I suggest you start campaigning now.. I don't know which lame duck you'd get behind. You might have to start your own party.

The fact still remains that it is possible to vote Starmer out, whereas there is no voting platform to get Raj out.

One is a fixture until he decides to go and the other is subject to the whims and wishes of the electorate. I don't need to form any new party to get him out, he's doing the job for us.

You can vote with your feet to get raj out. If enough people done it he'd be gone.

Aye if, but enough people haven't yet have they. He could run the club down or up, whichever takes his fancy. You are assuming enough people will vote with their feet, even then there is no guarantee. There is a guarantee to the fact that this government will eventually have to go to the people. Raj runs the club as he sees fit and is answerable to nobody. That is where the comparison between the two falls down, which is my point. Raj has a choice, Starmer hasn't. Raj is there until he decides to go. The other point to be made is, if there isn't a sale to suit him he has the option of doing a Darlo. He has all the cards and no matter what we say or do will influence anything unless Raj lets it.
That is the reality, no matter how unpalatable that is. I only wish one of us Poolies could change it but so far no one has been able to do that. Maybe someone's numbers will come good tonight because over £80 million is on offer.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:46 pm

Well I've got my tickets.

Leggie43 · **Joined:** Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am **Posts:** 7286

MutleyRules wrote:

Well I've got my tickets.

And I have.

When I win I will buy Pools and make you head of wine testing. :laugh:

Reform Professionals

Gadgies online