Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 5:34 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22553
Talk about short sighted incompetence. Some of you will know that Labour have sent 100 odd people to the US to support Harris’s campaign however it’s now gone to court with Trump’s lawyers rightly citing foreign interference.

It’s likely that Donald Trump will win next month as Harris has plummeted in the polls despite her rolling out Obama to support her. The problem is that most Americans think Obama was style over substance. Without googling can you think of a single achievement of the Obama presidency? I thought not and you wont find much even with Google.

So now we’re in a position where the next US president sees the UK government as an enemy. Surely anyone with a modicum of IQ could have predicted this would become a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:32 am 
This has been happening for many many years....Tories send people over to support the Republicans, Labour send people over to support the Democrats.
Nothing to see here.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:30 am
Posts: 606
Trump files lawsuits as part of his campaign strategy all the time, this is just to create a false equivalence with the Russians influencing the election on his behalf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36264
It should be banned for all Party’s.
Coming in and going out.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
Being nice to Trump means he'll be nice to you didn't work. The Tories tried it. It didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 9:30 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
Starmer is just the latest in a long line of naive and incompetents, they get worse as time moves on. Result of sheltered and privileged upbringing for most of them, never lived or worked on the real world. Labour is a party of idealists and activists which is fine in opposition but they have no idea of how to govern. Torys not much better if at all.
Democracy is broken totally under the present electoral system and loyalty to party being seen as the highest priority. We vote for a local MP but in reality we get a party puppet. Surely every vote in Parliament a free vote for each mp to truly vote with their conscience and in align with the majority of their constituents.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 10:02 am 
Also when Farage is over there campaigning on Trump's behalf isn't that foreign interference?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18786
MutleyRules wrote:
Also when Farage is over there campaigning on Trump's behalf isn't that foreign interference?

exactly. he has done it for his own personal wishes and has there been a concerted effort from starmer to send his supporters over there or these people are just doing a nigal. really would it change anybodies vote on here if the town had a few republicans or democrats walking about. doubt those in detroit will take notice of a few english labour supporters telling them how to vote. i,d tell em to mind there bloody business and get there basket case country sorted out first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 22553
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 10:20 am
Posts: 554
PTID wrote:
Starmer is just the latest in a long line of naive and incompetents, they get worse as time moves on. Result of sheltered and privileged upbringing for most of them, never lived or worked on the real world. Labour is a party of idealists and activists which is fine in opposition but they have no idea of how to govern. Torys not much better if at all.
Democracy is broken totally under the present electoral system and loyalty to party being seen as the highest priority. We vote for a local MP but in reality we get a party puppet. Surely every vote in Parliament a free vote for each mp to truly vote with their conscience and in align with the majority of their constituents.



Good post. You're probably better off with an independent MP.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12320
It doesn't seem sensible for anyone to do this as the risk of alienating the eventual winner is not worth taking. I know they all do it but what's the point of taking sides unless you're sure of backing the winner.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 1:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:15 am
Posts: 24
As anyone with half a brain knows, Trump’s team have been filing complaints about the election for months, with a variety of nonsense objections. It’s part of his plan to undermine the election and allow him to not accept the result if it is one he doesn’t like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:40 am 
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 6:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36264
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Being nice to Trump means he'll be nice to you didn't work. The Tories tried it. It didn't work.

That may well be so, but…don’t go needlessly out of your way to wind up a political pit bull that holds a grudge….
The real problem was the communication sent out by the gormless organiser describing them as ‘staff’ ..in other words employees of the Party that’s causing the trouble not volunteer Party members.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18786
wandrererreturns wrote:
As anyone with half a brain knows, Trump’s team have been filing complaints about the election for months, with a variety of nonsense objections. It’s part of his plan to undermine the election and allow him to not accept the result if it is one he doesn’t like.

he should buy pools and we,d never lose a game if he had is way. any defeat would be objected to with conspiracy theories abounding.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36264
We have them on the board already, Trump would be an amateur in comparison.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3441
If Trump wins our man Farage gets to greet him off Air Force One clappp ..that weasel starmer won't get a look in.What a gaffe sending that lot over :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 9:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3441
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3441
A few days before the Budget and they're out and about at 3am. :roll: What a disgrace!!


https://news.sky.com/story/video-shows- ... t-13242763


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
Sussex UK wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Pricks. We need more Zelensky's in the world, not these two pratts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 11:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2021 11:34 pm
Posts: 3709
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.


Also Farage funded his own travel and accommodation. To all intents and purposes he was there as a private citizen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3441
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Sussex UK wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Pricks. We need more Zelensky's in the world, not these two pratts.


Trumps the only Western leader who could get them around the table for peace talks..Trump for the White House 2024!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36264
Sussex UK wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Sussex UK wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Pricks. We need more Zelensky's in the world, not these two pratts.


Trumps the only Western leader who could get them around the table for peace talks..Trump for the White House 2024!!!


We’ve got Starmer…oh dear sadx …Max headroom without a personality sadx sadx sadx

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:33 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
Wonder if that MP will be charged, tried, and sent to jail within a week as were recent folk charged with disorder on the streets?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:45 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
Oh the irony - nobody within the Workers Party Government knows what the definition of a worker is!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:55 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 8856
PTID wrote:
Wonder if that MP will be charged, tried, and sent to jail within a week as were recent folk charged with disorder on the streets?


He's committed an act of violence.
So should Deffo go to the clinker for 4 years.

Or is it just anti immigration protesters who get the special treatment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:57 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:28 pm
Posts: 8856
Anyone know what happened to the outcome of that airport violence.
Disgrace if that is still ongoing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
Sussex UK wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Sussex UK wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Pricks. We need more Zelensky's in the world, not these two pratts.


Trumps the only Western leader who could get them around the table for peace talks..Trump for the White House 2024!!!


The only western leader who'll just give Putin what he wants.

Corrected it for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:04 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18786
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?

correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18786
kevin pooles gloves wrote:
Anyone know what happened to the outcome of that airport violence.
Disgrace if that is still ongoing

its all gone quiet about it. is this what they want, keep quiet and the hope everyone forgets about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
So, obtaining political gain from the gullible by giving assent to a murdering bastard dictator. Just the same thing with different words.

Trump is talking bollocks about NATO members but paying their way but folks will believe him without learning for themselves. 23 out of 31 countries pay their way with 6 of those paying more than their share. Russias neighbours, who Trump specifically mentioned all pay their share. USA don't even pay the biggest proportion of GDP. Not even in second place.

That's not a deal that will ever be made. Not that Putin sticks to them anyway. He just needs to be beaten, it is that simple. Trump thinks he can take the US back to 1939. Sorry Donald, lessons were learnt back then by better men than you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 6:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Sussex UK wrote:
MutleyRules wrote:
Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Farage wasn’t an MP at the time.

Since he became an MP he's been to America more times than he's been to Clacton.




https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-22/tru ... parliament


Top Blokes !! :cool: :cool: :cool:


Pricks. We need more Zelensky's in the world, not these two pratts.


Oh dear :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
Leggie43 wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Oh dear. Tin hat brigade. If only you were supported by actual facts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Leggie43 wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Oh dear. Tin hat brigade. If only you were supported by actual facts.


" Tin hat brigade " Why attack other people who have a different opinion to your own. I am pretty sure most on here are adults that understands World events. Let's just agree to disagree and respect each other's opinions. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:20 am
Posts: 41
No I doubt Trump would give Putin anything bit of sabre rattling on NATO trying to get members to cough up and put more into defence He knows America is far safer inside NATO than outside


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:20 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
23 out of 31 countries are "expected" to meet the 2% of GDP commitment. Last year the US were by far the biggest contributor both in actual monetary sum but 3.49% of GDP. When Trump threatened to pull out of NATO only 5 countries met the target. So his threat actually worked. Let's face it without the US NATO would have no clout or deterrent effect whatsoever.
These numbers come directly from NATO press releases so I'd imagine they're fact.
And I still reckon reigning in NATO expansion would be worth the price if Putin retreated from Ukraine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:20 am
Posts: 41
We will end up with Ukraine in NATO with a trade off 250 mile exclusive zone some like to call it no man’s land no military equipment inside of this exclusion zone both sides get what they want The USA would rather have eyes n ears outside of America


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
PTID wrote:
23 out of 31 countries are "expected" to meet the 2% of GDP commitment. Last year the US were by far the biggest contributor both in actual monetary sum but 3.49% of GDP. When Trump threatened to pull out of NATO only 5 countries met the target. So his threat actually worked. Let's face it without the US NATO would have no clout or deterrent effect whatsoever.
These numbers come directly from NATO press releases so I'd imagine they're fact.
And I still reckon reigning in NATO expansion would be worth the price if Putin retreated from Ukraine.


Agree. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 9:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 3441
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Leggie43 wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Oh dear. Tin hat brigade. If only you were supported by actual facts.


Fact is..We need the USA acting as World policeman right now!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2021 11:34 pm
Posts: 3709
Sussex UK wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Leggie43 wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Oh dear. Tin hat brigade. If only you were supported by actual facts.


Fact is..We need the USA acting as World policeman right now!!


Agree. The lefties hate America and whine on about US Imperialism but the plain fact is, without the US we would be fooked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 9:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
Ozzy Saltburn wrote:
Sussex UK wrote:
Pooly_Imp wrote:
Leggie43 wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump will give Putin what he wants to please himself not to please Put in. Trump doesn't want NATO expansion as the US is basically bankrolling the whole membership.
If he stopped the expansion of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine would that be a bad thing anyway?


100% on the money :wink: It really is that simple but this whole thing has been deliberately complicated by governments / banks and media for their own agendas. :wink:


Oh dear. Tin hat brigade. If only you were supported by actual facts.


Fact is..We need the USA acting as World policeman right now!!


Agree. The lefties hate America and whine on about US Imperialism but the plain fact is, without the US we would be fooked.


100% Agree. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
PTID wrote:
23 out of 31 countries are "expected" to meet the 2% of GDP commitment. Last year the US were by far the biggest contributor both in actual monetary sum but 3.49% of GDP. When Trump threatened to pull out of NATO only 5 countries met the target. So his threat actually worked. Let's face it without the US NATO would have no clout or deterrent effect whatsoever.
These numbers come directly from NATO press releases so I'd imagine they're fact.
And I still reckon reigning in NATO expansion would be worth the price if Putin retreated from Ukraine.


You're assuming Putin would stick to some kind of agreement. That's not how he works. That's not how he has ever worked. He is in Ukraine despite there being a treaty in the first place. He went in to Ukraine to keep them out of NATO (and the Nazi thing etc...) so will not permit them to join. If they do It rules out his ever going back to take the rest of the country on some made up bollocks reason which he will. People who know him and who know about him have said it Its only Trump and the folks who take in his guff that believe otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:02 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2023 3:07 pm
Posts: 3863
Trump's guff got another 18 out of 31 countries to pay their share. Trump's guff may very well put an end to the conflict in Ukraine, who knows? But it's been what 2 years or more now where the West had had zero impact in bringing it to an end, at an astronomical cost in aid to Us the taxpayers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 2515
PTID wrote:
Trump's guff got another 18 out of 31 countries to pay their share. Trump's guff may very well put an end to the conflict in Ukraine, who knows? But it's been what 2 years or more now where the West had had zero impact in bringing it to an end, at an astronomical cost in aid to Us the taxpayers.


Its true. You've got summat there.

And the tin hat thing..... sorry to you... Leggie?

If we had acted sooner ( the West) we will have achieved more. As it is look at the amazing job the Ukrainians have done.
Decimated the red army (the trained ones anyway) and the Black Sea Fleet. The amount spent is equivalent to running the US for a single day. An American expert said we could not have hoped to degrade Russia so amazingly cheaply. The perspective matters whe n it comes to these amounts.

I don't min Trump but wish he hadn't pivoted this as an angle to win votes. These poor buggers are fighting for their country's existence and Trump is playing political football and spouting BS. We have enough garbage coming from the Russian side.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36264
Pooly_Imp wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump's guff got another 18 out of 31 countries to pay their share. Trump's guff may very well put an end to the conflict in Ukraine, who knows? But it's been what 2 years or more now where the West had had zero impact in bringing it to an end, at an astronomical cost in aid to Us the taxpayers.


Its true. You've got summat there.

And the tin hat thing..... sorry to you... Leggie?

If we had acted sooner ( the West) we will have achieved more. As it is look at the amazing job the Ukrainians have done.
Decimated the red army (the trained ones anyway) and the Black Sea Fleet. The amount spent is equivalent to running the US for a single day. An American expert said we could not have hoped to degrade Russia so amazingly cheaply. The perspective matters whe n it comes to these amounts.

I don't min Trump but wish he hadn't pivoted this as an angle to win votes. These poor buggers are fighting for their country's existence and Trump is playing political football and spouting BS. We have enough garbage coming from the Russian side.

Can I take a purely cynical approach here, I would rather they were fighting the Russians than us, because they have that inner desire to succeed in their bid to be independent from what they justly regard as their enemy.
Ukrainian’s even welcomed the arrival of the Germans when they invaded Russia because of the famine which killed millions of their people due to Stalins reorganising of the agricultural system and nationalising it which was a complete disaster in the 1930’s so they ain’t exactly bosom buddies.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18786
PTID wrote:
23 out of 31 countries are "expected" to meet the 2% of GDP commitment. Last year the US were by far the biggest contributor both in actual monetary sum but 3.49% of GDP. When Trump threatened to pull out of NATO only 5 countries met the target. So his threat actually worked. Let's face it without the US NATO would have no clout or deterrent effect whatsoever.
These numbers come directly from NATO press releases so I'd imagine they're fact.
And I still reckon reigning in NATO expansion would be worth the price if Putin retreated from Ukraine.

same here and the biggest worry i have if the yanks pulled out of their financial backing would the UK do its upmost to fill the gap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 6995
accrington fan wrote:
PTID wrote:
23 out of 31 countries are "expected" to meet the 2% of GDP commitment. Last year the US were by far the biggest contributor both in actual monetary sum but 3.49% of GDP. When Trump threatened to pull out of NATO only 5 countries met the target. So his threat actually worked. Let's face it without the US NATO would have no clout or deterrent effect whatsoever.
These numbers come directly from NATO press releases so I'd imagine they're fact.
And I still reckon reigning in NATO expansion would be worth the price if Putin retreated from Ukraine.

same here and the biggest worry i have if the yanks pulled out of their financial backing would the UK do its upmost to fill the gap.


I get the impression the yanks feel ultra safe as the Atlantic Ocean separates them from Europe and they won’t be invaded although 9/11 proved it wasn’t immune to terrorists attacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Starmer and Labour again
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 4:55 am
Posts: 7286
Pooly_Imp wrote:
PTID wrote:
Trump's guff got another 18 out of 31 countries to pay their share. Trump's guff may very well put an end to the conflict in Ukraine, who knows? But it's been what 2 years or more now where the West had had zero impact in bringing it to an end, at an astronomical cost in aid to Us the taxpayers.


Its true. You've got summat there.

And the tin hat thing..... sorry to you... Leggie?

Pooly_Imp thank you. But you don't need to apologise to me or anyone else for what you said. You have your opinion and I have mine and that's totally fine. I just think when it comes to politics we cannot control what happens and are left in the dark in regard to what really goes on and this muddies the waters for any of us to be able to say what is true and what is propaganda. For those reasons I believe it's best to agree or simply disagree with each other and put forward differing opinions. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bazil, bobby lemonade, dykey, Essex poolie, Hawklord, jonnyraf, Jules, kevin pooles gloves, Manchester Exile, marcus richardsons third leg, Pools-on-trent, PTID, Saladswerver, Smokin Joe, stupoolie, Tonto1968 and 304 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.