Liddlegate points deduction...

KingOfTheMond · **Posted:** Sun May 02, 2010 9:41 pm

If we do get slapped with a 3 point deduction, will it definately be taken fron this seasons tally or will it be similar to the deduction system used when clubs go into administration? eg after a cutoff date the points deduction is postponed til next season... Anyone got a clue? I sure as hell havnt!

parmopooly · **Posted:** Sun May 02, 2010 10:01 pm

it happened this season, so the deduction would have to be this season I would have thought

barrywardrobe · **Posted:** Sun May 02, 2010 11:18 pm

i'm sure they could have made a decision quicker.

the posh pricks.

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6477

barrywardrobe wrote:

i'm sure they could have made a decision quicker.

the posh pricks.

not really, seeing as Pools had until the 26th to reply to the charge and when they did it looks like they requested a personal hearing which probably would have meant a minimum amount of time between the request and the hearing itself (maybe a week)

parmopooly · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 11:17 am

they will have to do this prior to the final match in the interests of fair competition, such that events will be decided on the field of play this Saturday.
It's what we would be demanding if another club was up for this

Still hope we might get away with it - but I'm not holding out much hope

grabec · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 11:19 am

MadJohn wrote:

parmopooly wrote:

it happened this season, so the deduction would have to be this season I would have thought

^ that

There is no way the punishment will be delayed until next season

But didn't Chesterfield manage to hold over their points deduction, that time when it relegated us?

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6477

Think you mean Rotherham Miss G :wink:

parmopooly · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 11:27 am

Rotherham delayed entering administration, which enabled them to stay up in 05/06

The fact that Chesterfield gained so many points using a team, whereby they had cheated in order to put that team together, but were only deducted 9 points - is a case Pools should be using to put forward - as it was Pools who suffered again in that instance as the points deduction was not sufficient for us to be able to have gotten into 3rd place in 01/02 season

grabec · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 11:50 am

Yeah, it was the Chesterfield thing, tho I couldn't remember the details.

garthwd · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:23 am **Posts:** 799

Let's hope we are as lucky as West Ham who weren't deducted points purely because it might have relegated them when they continued to play Carlos Tevez when they shouldn't have.

parmopooly · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 5:24 pm

good point Mr Garthwaite!!!

loan_star · **Posted:** Mon May 03, 2010 7:14 pm

garthwd wrote:

Let's hope we are as lucky as West Ham who weren't deducted points purely because it might have relegated them when they continued to play Carlos Tevez when they shouldn't have.

They could just fine you a few million quid then!!! Then you could be taken to court by another team and lose a few million more quid!

garthwd · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:23 am **Posts:** 799

loan_star wrote:

garthwd wrote:

Let's hope we are as lucky as West Ham who weren't deducted points purely because it might have relegated them when they continued to play Carlos Tevez when they shouldn't have.

They could just fine you a few million quid then!!! Then you could be taken to court by another team and lose a few million more quid!

Given the differences in finances between the two leagues I reckon we should be fined a fiver in comparison clappp

Liddlegate points deduction...

Gadgies online