PTID wrote:
Made a big show of signing a declaration that they'll put troops into Ukraine if a peace deal is agreed. Why did they do that when Putin has already said it would be unacceptable and part of his justification for invading was to stop the expansion of NATO? Ard they really happy for the war to continue and is it deflecting his lack of action and presence at home?
Also he can't commit troops without an Act of Parliament which he hasn't got, he surely must know that?
And, why is the Ukraine border worth protecting by UK troops when our own borders aren't?
Why is the Ukraine border worth protecting, where will Putin proceed next if Ukraine falls to Russia ?
France and the U.K. have signed an agreement to put troops in Ukraine pending a cease fire, Putin isn’t going to accept a cease fire under those terms. He will carry on trying to bomb Ukraine into submission no matter the cost and the loss of Russian troops.
Just to clarify Starmer (Snowy before you say it I am not defending him just stating facts) opened prime minister’s questions on Wednesday by reassuring MPs the matter would be put to the Commons before any troops are deployed to Ukraine, a point the right wing MSM failed to mention.
We should be more concerned about Trumps actions threatening to annexe Greenland one way or another and threats to other sovereign nations. His agenda prior to his election was to stop wars but he doesn’t appear to be doing that currently, if Trump would just come out and say it’s all about oil. America has loads of oil but it’s poor quality ‘thin’ oil they need ‘heavy’ oil for byproducts from it like plastics.