Chesssington wrote:
One of the guys I go to pools with is a big Aussie rules football fan. He has family in Australia and goes there every year.
He said that you can't send players off in Aussie rules, technically you could punch someone deliberately in the face in front of the ref and yet still not get sent off. You would no doubt get banned for 6 months afterwards but nothing would happen during the game.
We have all seen games where a player is sent off incorrectly and even if it was a correct sending off, the game is often ruined because of it and the more I think about it, I think the Aussies are onto something here. Folk pay good money to watch 22 players on a pitch, not 21, 20 or 19 and so why don't players simply get bans after games. Hypothetically, the ref could give out as many yellow cards as he liked and the players would suffer afterwards dependent on the severity of the card.
Maybe harder to introduce into the lower leagues but with the number of cameras at premiership games, it would soon see players racking up bans for diving, play acting, dangerous play etc.
Probably needs some thought but if you take the Newcastle sending off for instance after 17 mins today. Defo red by the letter of the law but ruined the game. Haven't seen the Stoke sendings off but the same principal goes.
Completely different sport. Players push and punch each other all game which is not deemed against the rules. I watch a few games a week and follow the Richmond Tigers. To compare it with football is like comparing kelly brook to lily savage.
Mark nobles red card is the worst I have ever seen giving. Clearly wins the ball and never touched him. Ref should be fined and suspended himself.