The Poolie Bunker

You spend your time repetitively on here constantly criticising Farage…..have you got a crush on him and bitter at being rebuffed…?

Doesn't anyone who states they'd blindly vote Labour if an election was called tomorrow lack all credibility on political matters? That's a question again Jamie, for clarity as English doesn't seem to be your 1st language anymore.

what crime did he commit. surely thats been published or is it a conviction thats now been taken of their record due to the time it was done.

I hear…’We’ve always voted Labour, or Tory or Limp Dem’ …..but the fools votes are part of the foundation and count for nothing because they’re spoken for.
They people who decide are the floating voters who think, not the sheep in the flock.

in some ways always voting one way is not as bad as it sounds. listening to all the lies they all tell you its easy to fall for one set over an other. lets say even starmer sounded genuine in his goodbye speech.

Aye, but the small gap called ‘running the country’ was a complete balls up.
He can always devote time to the family tool making business.

Let’s be honest at the last GE the electorate were looking for an alternative and Labour in their eyes was the only alternative in the 3 party system, they didn’t vote for Starmer, they voted for the Labour Party unfortunately he wouldn’t make a politician as long as he has a hole in his ar**.

No it was a knee jerk reaction that backfired…and boy did it backfire.

Farage could walk out of a Clacton tea room without paying for his scone and jamie would be onto it!!

Spot on Snowy - only it is now going to get worse.

he,ll know what shaving cream he uses and the make of his toothpaste.

I only post facts about Farage which are factual, bearing in mind when was Farage or how many times has he been to Clacton since he was elected. No issues about security as he was paid £5 million plus the convicted criminal who provides security for him.

Aye but we move on, many times I have asked you Snowy who is your favourite party, don’t say it depends on their agenda as none of them ever stick to it.

How much money do you have in the bank Jamie..?
I only ask because you appear to want to know every piece of tittle tattle about those you disapprove of….so what’s good for the goose is good for the Jamie….and so petty.q
The only news you post about Farage is news that fits your obsessive criticism agenda.
In other words ‘news’ that suits your agenda, you don’t do balanced or neutral news/ views just repetitive attacks on your bogeyman, who has you terrified.

Money in the bank, hopefully enough till I pass away.
I have only posted news about Farage which is in the reputable MSM including The Times none of it fake news nor based on my opinion. Taking £5 million, his association with a convicted fraudster is hardly tittle tattle obviously you don’t keep up the with news. He has threatened to sue many individuals and organisations none of which he has carried followed up on, why ?
I am past caring at my age but I think the working class should be more ‘terrified’ of Farage, me I am just concerned as so many are taken in by him like you apparently are.

You’ve just given the answer Farage gave….you never revealed your income, so in effect you are no different to Farage.

Your reference to your use of the ‘reputable MSM ‘ means the MSM that agrees with your limited world view.
You even approve the use of the Tory press to back up your obsession…in other words you have no principles by using any source of information as long as it serves your mindset.
Can’t be taken seriously but never was.

And yet Political Custard is widely regarded as providing Left leaning, biased and heavily edited video clips? Should be regarded as an entertainment show rather than factual source of information.
Mmm mmm

not a big farage fan myself, but if it is proved he has done nothing wrong i can see it actually helping him in the future and might even increase his following. nobody likes to see anyone being bullied by lies and half truths.

Help with some digs and staff,hardly the crime of the century, you lot must be desperate..Has your man with the eye lashes been back to makerfield yet?..I hope he's going to smarten up for trump and vance,they'll tear strips off him..

The current government is riddled with criminals, so that's nothing new, hardly any of them have a squeaky clean past, that's probably why non of them are prepared to put their hats in the ring for a leadership challenge, too many skeletons in the closet.

[color=#800080]
[or just following orders from some greater world body.

Can you name a few who have been convicted of any criminal activities ?

When was the last time a politician received a £5 million gift ? Very judgmental, I don’t care what anyone wears as long as they produce results, how many people wear suits and ties nowadays, ties are definitely a thing of the past.

Why shouldn’t I agree with the Tory press, why does it where my source of information comes from, they agree what I have always said about Farage, strange a bit back Starmer was being ridiculed for his specs etc by The Times but now it’s Farage time to be ridiculed and you don’t like it Snowy.
I put you down as a closeted Tory but you are now a closeted Reform supporter

I agree it could go one way or another but nothing coming out is half truths and lies, by the mere fact he has threatened to sue people, a Trump tactic but never has up until now.

Farage to make a statement at 2pm about his political future, should be interesting.

Oooooh ….you’ll be getting quite ‘aroused’

Are you joking, there's that many I haven't got the time to name them all, many have only avoided convictions because of their status and able to call in favours, or manipulate the truth, you need to get your head out of the sand, your waffling on with your blinkers on as per usual. Also as he's just stated in a speech Farage was given that money for the security of him and his family, as the government withdrew his security help as he's a danger to their ideological views.

No Snowy he made me very very angry once again came out with the statement that he is the most physically attacked politician, he forgets Jo Cox and Sir David Ames’s who were both murdered, his statement was the usual waffle, we have heard it all before.
He is standing down as the MP for Clacton bearing in mind under the current investigations into his financials he could have been forced to resign anyway.

So which current MPs are physically and verbally attacked more than Farage Jamie?
He's putting his position on the line to make a point, let's see what happens in the by-election, my guess is He'll win again.
And the investigations will continue, at this moment in time he's not guilty of any wrong doing or crime is he?

Yes,the people v establishment Clacton by-election will be interesting,Jamie..Hats off to Nigel for calling the shots btw.

I predict that none of the other parties will stand. It will be Farage vs Count Binface. He will have thrown his toys out of the pram for nothing, he will have cost the taxpayer a quarter of a million pounds for nothing, just because he doesn’t like being asked difficult questions.

He’s barely been to his constituency of Clacton since he was elected, he’s only mentioned them 4 times in parliament, he’s now inconveniencing them further by forcing them to vote again, then once he’s back in and found guilty of being funded by criminals, then he will be forced to stand down again, and there will be yet another by-election, yet another £250k cost to the taxpayer, yet another inconvenience to the people of Clacton.

The guy is a grifter, he’s more establishment than the 90% of the people in parliament, and is a multimillionaire due to being funded by shady billionaires who only care about increasing their riches. He’s panicking because he’s being found out.

You obviously didn't hear the part where Reform said they will cover the costs of the by-election, so no cost to the taxpayer, unlike the Mayor of Manchester replacement and the Makerfield by-election. But I am mystified as to why he's doing it, seems pointless to me.

The lefties online have been squealing for Farages head all week...he's finished,jail him,he's not popular anyone!..Well why not let them have their day at the polls eh...

A political party can’t pay for an election, there is no mechanism in place to allow it, and even if there was, it would set a dangerous legal precedent for people to have undue influence, and so would be rejected.

They're saying they'll cover the costs, what's bad about that, a by-election can only be called if the standing MP decides to resign (or is sacked/jailed), why is that dangerous?, surely there's no benefit from one party forfeiting it to help an opposing party gain?

Don’t post stuff like I haven’t got time, name names ? I’ll name one Farage, he said Sky posted a photograph of his house, Nigel Farage himself previously posed for a photograph directly outside the same Kent home, which is why critics and political opponents argue his recent claims of media intrusion are hypocritical.

Read my previous post where 2 MPs have been murdered, if he has been attacked so many times why hasn’t it been publicised, Farage never hides from publicly. A claim his home was fire bombed, I didn’t see that in the headlines, he said his phone was stolen but never reported it to the Police ?

The accusations have been in The Times hardly e leftie newspaper as it’s owned by Murdoch.

Smokescreen, Farage knew he was going to be found guilty of breaching the Parliamentary Codes so he jumped before he was pushed, it’s a circus as none of the major parties are putting candidates up. It looks like his only opposition will be The Monster Raving Loony Party, Count Binface and any other independent prepared to lose their deposit.
He still faces Parliamentary scrutiny even if he wins the election which could mean another election costing the tax payers more money, why didn’t he wait until they come to decision ?
One convincing win is hardly going to influence the Parliamentary Standards Committee or elsewhere as there 650 parliamentary constituencies.

Who mentioned the Times?

What's he been found guilty of then,Jamie?.

maybe you should do some research on Murdoch,catch up...

Get real.He’s continually attacked by politicians with a track record of crap.

Starmer, as much use as a stable in a submarine.
Badenoch, talks like she’s an aggressive General but hasn’t looked over her shoulder to see the cardboard army of toy soldiers behind her bombast.
The clown leading the Lib Dem’s, those social workers at prayer, the followers of the Postman Pat of politics role was never explained in any depth.

You’re like a gold prospector grubbing for gold on the Wagga slag banks to dish the dirt on Farage and think you’ve got a fish on the line…no, you’re just helping the system protect itself, the the cosy two and a half party’s who’ve been ruining the country for over thirty years and brought us nowt but misery.
Carry on defending the clowns and their degradation of this country….not that it’ll effect you in you’re tropical Scunthorpe.

Hardly a newspaper.
The home of the smug .
You back whatever agrees with you, even contradictions don’t bother you.

So another straight question to Jamie results in no answer but more deflection. Which CURRENT MPs are verbally and physically attacked more than Farage - Cox and Ames are no longer MPs Jamie.
The so called big parties won't stand against him because they're scared of losing not because it's a phony election. They put candidates up in the Makerfield election which was held due to manipulative rather than democratic needs. The costs were more in that it is more expensive due to the added Mayoral election required too. Costs were quoted as being part of the original prevention of Burnham being allowed to stand by Labour's NEC, did the costs go away - absolutely not.
If Farage was out to stop the investigation by Parliament he could have just stood down as MP, the investigation stops and wouldn't restart if he didn't stand again.

he is guilty as he is right wing and will remain so in the eyes of the left until he proves himself innocent. as for the other party,s not putting up candidates is it more to do with the knowing they have little chance to topple him. if they were confident they,d be throwing a top candidate against him.

The current government is riddled with criminals, so that's nothing new, hardly any of them have a squeaky clean past, that's probably why non of them are prepared to put their hats in the ring for a leadership challenge, too many skeletons in the closet.[/quote]

Can you name a few who have been convicted of any criminal activities ?[/quote]

Are you joking, there's that many I haven't got the time to name them all, many have only avoided convictions because of their status and able to call in favours, or manipulate the truth, you need to get your head out of the sand, your waffling on with your blinkers on as per usual. Also as he's just stated in a speech Farage was given that money for the security of him and his family, as the government withdrew his security help as he's a danger to their ideological views.[/quote]


Don’t post stuff like I haven’t got time, name names ? I’ll name one Farage, he said Sky posted a photograph of his house, Nigel Farage himself previously posed for a photograph directly outside the same Kent home, which is why critics and political opponents argue his recent claims of media intrusion are hypocritical.[/quote]

Who gave you authority to dictate what people post on here?, there's an article on FB detailing 14 Labour MPs who were or are currently under investigation for criminal offences but it's pages long and I can't be bothered to attach it, anyway you would just ignore it.

He’s paying for it himself.

Ungrip your handbag.

its so obvious that there will be MP,s who have committed some type of criminal offence. The vast amount would have just got away with it like the clergy and in the past the royals. Doubt most on here are totally squeeky clean either. Its just we are all human and these things happen to human beings. once at the top its being caught thats the worst thing more than the crime itself as someone else would have committed it first.