MutleyRules wrote:
PTID wrote:
Who has said that the Glasgow paedos are not as bad as the white ones then?
Is English your first language, is that why you appear to translate stuff written into what you want, it's a bit sad if your main intent is a wind up on the back of serious issues - paedophilia and racism?
You and others numerous times in this thread saying there's a huge difference between the 2 gangs yeh daft racist....this is paedophiles we are talking about here.
And how is this a wind-up...it's got people talking...it's onto page2 already.
What is the difference between the Glasgow Paedos and the other historical grooming gangs?
First thing to say is individuals or gangs who are guilty of sex crimes involving children are both equally depraved and deserving the maximum punishment the law allows.
BUT
There is a huge difference between the Glasgow paedos and for instance the Rotheram gang. The difference relates to the scale of the offending. The Rotheram paedos had 1450 victims so 1450 lives ruined by these depraved individuals.
If someone steals your motorbike from outside your house that is theft. If someone breaks into your house while you are on holiday and steals everything you own that is also theft. Are both crimes exactly the same or is there a difference? Mutley would argue both crimes were exactly the same because that seems to be his attitude when comparing the Glasgow lot to the Rotheram lot.