PTID wrote:
And the guy who was behind the whole project, what would he have to gain from lying?
In fact if they'd added the fact that Wrexham were 2nd choice, even without naming their 1st choice, it would only have added to the rags to riches story.
It's unlikely we'll ever know if an offer was made or even any sort of serious enquiry.
No it wouldn't have. A great way to endear yourself to the fans of the club that you own is to tell them they were second choice. Raj Singh lying (although he said he rejected offers because he didn't know who they were and then said they were actually the Wrexham owners but didn't want Pools) means he can control the narrative around him rejecting life changing money for HUFC and cling on to some control. Ker lying means he enamors himself to the fans of the club they own, of which he is a director, it keeps the fairytale story going of the americans falling in love with Wrexham as a club and town going and how they were the best club they looked at etc. Now what does Jeff Stelling get from lying? A few pages in an autobiography and a 5 min tale to tell at his tour/after dinner speaking? This story is a minor part in his life of which only really Pools fans are interested in. It's not going to attract people to buy his book or see him speak as people will be more interested in his football Saturday stories.
Based on this I know who I believe.