Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 2:53 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 7078
Jamie1952 wrote:
paulus the woodgnome and a side salad wrote:
Jamie1952 wrote:
The Security are a private company so Pools request how many they require on match days, I think the catering is as well, staff on both probably on zero hours contracts as well.


As you rightly state the security will be a private company and also a sprinkling of local workers, being put in the clubs shoes if you don't get the numbers locally to police or serve the spectators coming in you can't just cancel the match, you have to turn to private firms who will be more expensive, bus people in from outside the area, and if the ratio of security to fans doesn't match up your only alternative is to shut certain parts of the ground. It may also be that as this was an unscheduled cup game the club was not able to plan much in advance, and the companies are not able to supply staff needed due to other commitments?


The games I went to at the start of the season I am sure the name of company was on the back of the stewards jackets. There were some black lads and to be fair were very polite and helpful and knew the layout of the seatings in the Mill Hiuse Stand.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 10:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18928
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:56 pm
Posts: 7078
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.


I remember the Pools fans changing ends at halftime walking round the track, not a steward in site.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18928
Jamie1952 wrote:
[

I remember the Pools fans changing ends at halftime walking round the track, not a steward in site.

that was the thing at some grounds but not all. they walked in opposite directions to the others but for some reason that will never happen again. its not as if the game as got rougher and tougher since those days where yesterdays opponents would have needed a big police escort out of the town if they were around nowadays with a lot of fans attitudes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36398
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.

There was more coppers at the match then, I suspect stewards are a cheaper option. Useless, but economically viable.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18928
Snowy wrote:
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.

There was more coppers at the match then, I suspect stewards are a cheaper option. Useless, but economically viable.

cannot go back 100 years but there never seemed that many more inside the ground then apart when everything started going tits up in the 70,s. now we,ll have as many police inside plus the army of stewards as we had at one time therefore the costs at games must be terrific now. first thing now is you walk through the gates and the first thing you see is a steward after seeing them outside as well. always get the impression at some grounds they,d rather evict you than help you both inside and outside. the vast majority would be happy to still stand side by side with a fan from the opposition apart from derby games and the odd other fixture with some history.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 1:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:29 pm
Posts: 5382
Snowy wrote:
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.

There was more coppers at the match then, I suspect stewards are a cheaper option. Useless, but economically viable.


Correct. Policing charges went through the roof about 15-20 years ago. It put an end to quite a few events, like the Fish Quay Festival in North Shields. Pools and other small clubs got absolutely hammered with policing charges whenever a big away attendance was expected. Event security firms are the cheaper alternative.

Strolling down memory lane is all well and good, but as the relevant licencing authority, Hartlepool Council wouldn't allow games to go ahead without appropriate security and safety provision in place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm
Posts: 36398
Flying Hogans wrote:
Snowy wrote:
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.

There was more coppers at the match then, I suspect stewards are a cheaper option. Useless, but economically viable.


Correct. Policing charges went through the roof about 15-20 years ago. It put an end to quite a few events, like the Fish Quay Festival in North Shields. Pools and other small clubs got absolutely hammered with policing charges whenever a big away attendance was expected. Event security firms are the cheaper alternative.

Strolling down memory lane is all well and good, but as the relevant licencing authority, Hartlepool Council wouldn't allow games to go ahead without appropriate security and safety provision in place.

Cleveland County Council didn’t help either.
I remember when on a TV programme a spokesman for Cleveland tried to justify their help in getting the Riverside Stadium built, and suggested Pools should consider a ground share …stpid ….Sir John Hall was on the programme and said don’t be ridiculous, football’s tribal, there’s no chance…..the bloke shut up.

_________________
It’s what he does….. he’s a terrier.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 12:49 am 
Online

Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 1:09 am
Posts: 1952
Location: Ketrin, Norfants
Flying Hogans wrote:
Snowy wrote:
accrington fan wrote:
Snowy wrote:
Doesn’t the FA stipulate a number of ‘stewards’ per attendees per FA Cup match…..? But how you anticipate that figure… sctatchinghead

plus the game has been played for more years without them than with them. you are not telling me everyone acted like choir boys in the distant past especially when you read about crowd trouble and even ground closure 100 years back. once it seemed a handful of uniformed coppers being enough and not dressed in hi vis or paramilarary uniform who usually had an easy afternoon of it.

There was more coppers at the match then, I suspect stewards are a cheaper option. Useless, but economically viable.


Correct. Policing charges went through the roof about 15-20 years ago. It put an end to quite a few events, like the Fish Quay Festival in North Shields. Pools and other small clubs got absolutely hammered with policing charges whenever a big away attendance was expected. Event security firms are the cheaper alternative.

Strolling down memory lane is all well and good, but as the relevant licencing authority, Hartlepool Council wouldn't allow games to go ahead without appropriate security and safety provision in place.


They did go through the roof - agreed.
From memory, I'm sure Cleveland Police were listed as creditors on the '93 winding up petition
.
Along with tax purposes, think that was the main reason behind the 'GIbson Guess' - the ridiculous attendance fiddling that went on during Garry (with 2 Rs) Gibson's Stewardship.

I remember several instances when we played the likes of Stoke, Brum and West Brom at home in the 3rd Tier (circa '93 when we had a decent team) Clubs with massive away support - filling the whole of the old Town End terrace- yet the crowd was announced as 3850 when in reality it was nearer 6k.

At one of those games, remember walking out at the end of the match as the crowd figure was read out and even the copper behind me laughed
and made a comment, berating the figure announced against actual reality!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 18928
lowering the published attendance figures was popular at one time. Rochdale actually did it the other way round in the fear of being voted out of the league because of workington type attendances they got.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 1:14 pm 
Online

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 767
Kettering Poolie wrote:

I remember several instances when we played the likes of Stoke, Brum and West Brom at home in the 3rd Tier (circa '93 when we had a decent team) Clubs with massive away support - filling the whole of the old Town End terrace- yet the crowd was announced as 3850 when in reality it was nearer 6k.


That Birmingham City match had a fair bit of chew - there was even fighting in the seats of the Mill House.

Can't remember the names of either, but I've read two books about football hooliganism that made reference to that game. The first was a biography of one of their fans who was the top bloke when it came to violence, and he was asked who were the worst fans he'd encountered at an away match. His reply was "Hartlepool. I don't know what they feed them fuckers up there but we got a right kicking".

The second book was about a Birmingham copper who got moved into a squad of undercover officers whose job it was to infiltrate the "firms" of the day. After spending many months gaining their trust, he recalled his first away day in the book. "It was at Hartlepool, and I got punched in the face as I got off the train."

Crazy times, but that's the way it was back then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A New low
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 1:19 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 12320
A Hull fan told me years ago that Pools fans were the only ones they were frightened of.

_________________
Come on Pools


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Bazil, Bluestreak, charltonclive, derwent, Herr Flick, JBPoolie, Kebab&chips, Kenny Bottles, nat the poolie, poolie1966, Poolie_merv, PTID, Sandman, Stotty1908, TFP and 241 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.