91 points

katcha · **Posted:** Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:56 pm

chip fireball wrote:

ive said for about a month that this is the magic figure we will need to achieve to win the league. pools now need 4 wins and a draw from their remaining 7 games to reach this figure and take the title.

after todays results only 3 other sides can get to 91 points. given their fixtures i cannot see milton keynes winning all their remaining 7 games to exceed 91 points.

swindon would have to win 7 of their 8 games to get to 91 points. this is another big ask.

walsall would need to win 6 of their last 7 to get to 91 points. they do have some soft looking fixtures coming up but have to travel to swindon on the last day of the season.

surely pools can do it this time?

better get 92 just to be safe!!

lumpy · **Joined:** Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:14 pm **Posts:** 54

Less win last 4 home games and we win it.but will only really start talking about it once we got the P against our name

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:45 pm

chip fireball wrote:

we devalue the language by using words like genius lightly.

however in this case the word was merited. pools will win 1-0 next week taking the title when walsall draw with swindon.

i know bristol rovers are unbeaten in 7 league games and have only 1 goal in 700 minutes, but this is our destiny. i kid you not.

Two draws. Rovers are the form team of the moment :wink:

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:31 pm

chip fireball wrote:

havent swindon already butchered you once already this season ? i wouldnt fancy having to go there and get a result.

we beat bristol rovers 2-0 at their place and the scoreline flattered them. they know they need to beat us to maintain a play-off place, so they cant sit back and play for a point.

we struggle against teams on bad pitches. at the vic its a different story. we havent lost there for nearly 6 months. we will not lose, so you need at least a point.

Well it starts with two draws :wink:

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:28 am

I wouldn't fancy an Home game against Darlow at the moment!!!! confised

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:48 am

I'm not confident....It's a BIG Game remember!!!! :roll:

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

that would be an astounding amount of points to get to finish second wouldn't it. carlisle only had 86 points as champs last year,yeovil 83 the year before. all credit to walsall for keeping it going. but I would have taken this at the start of the season, 1 match to go already promoted and still a realistic chance of the title.

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:05 pm

dawlishmonkey wrote:

that would be an astounding amount of points to get to finish second wouldn't it. carlisle only had 86 points as champs last year,yeovil 83 the year before. all credit to walsall for keeping it going. but I would have taken this at the start of the season, 1 match to go already promoted and still a realistic chance of the title.

Absolutely, it's a pity we can't cross the line together like marathon runners do, but I suppose there has to be a 'winner'. I think we're both winners already!

Spender · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:00 pm

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Absolutely, it's a pity we can't cross the line together like marathon runners do, but I suppose there has to be a 'winner'. I think we're both winners already!

Oy Mr Plagiaristic Saddler, I said that about marathons on your board!! :evil:

And no it's not a fooking Snickers...... rage

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:37 pm

Pooliekev wrote:

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Absolutely, it's a pity we can't cross the line together like marathon runners do, but I suppose there has to be a 'winner'. I think we're both winners already!

Oy Mr Plagiaristic Saddler, I said that about marathons on your board!! :evil:

And no it's not a fooking Snickers...... rage

You don't think I actually read any of the contributions you post on our board do you? :wink:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36526

NO... obviously. :roll:

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:59 pm

Snowy wrote:

NO... obviously. :roll:

Or I might have forgotten...... :!:

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 36526

..same thing.

Spender · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:12 am

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Pooliekev wrote:

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Absolutely, it's a pity we can't cross the line together like marathon runners do, but I suppose there has to be a 'winner'. I think we're both winners already!

Oy Mr Plagiaristic Saddler, I said that about marathons on your board!! :evil:

And no it's not a fooking Snickers...... rage

You don't think I actually read any of the contributions you post on our board do you? :wink:

I'd never be so presumptuous to assume that Walsall fans can actually read.... :grin:

Particularly with your onanistic proclivities; you're probably three quarters blind....... :uhoh:

SaigonSaddler · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:13 pm

Pooliekev wrote:

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Pooliekev wrote:

SaigonSaddler wrote:

Absolutely, it's a pity we can't cross the line together like marathon runners do, but I suppose there has to be a 'winner'. I think we're both winners already!

Oy Mr Plagiaristic Saddler, I said that about marathons on your board!! :evil:

And no it's not a fooking Snickers...... rage

You don't think I actually read any of the contributions you post on our board do you? :wink:

I'd never be so presumptuous to assume that Walsall fans can actually read.... :grin:

Particularly with your onanistic proclivities; you're probably three quarters blind....... :uhoh:

My glasses are extraordinarily thick! clappp

parmopooly · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:54 pm

but not as thick as people on Rivals

91 points

Gadgies online