Username:  
Password:  
Register 
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 9:26 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
For the second week in a row the game is won and pointless changes happen. Why the fuck was the defence changed there. We were clearing everything and in no way looked in threat.

Colin cooper cost us that game and seems out of his depth to me. Is he not watching what's happening. The back four was solid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
under no threat!!!! reading some of the posts on here we were under the cosh second half... never listened to it but only going by people on here.........

Do you have different ears to everyone else....spock maybe,,,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:42 pm
Posts: 6592
Location: Hartlepool - for now....
BBC Tees were blaming an individual error from Baldwin who they claimed had the chance to clear into the Bristol half or boot it in the stand....

Disappointing that we couldn't see the game out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
How many saves did flinders make in the2nd half. I couldn't give a fuck what people are saying on here, I'm guessing the vast majority were not there. Poolsworld does not paint the correct picture. We should not have changed the back four and that is a fact


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Jonny wrote:
BBC Tees were blaming an individual error from Baldwin who they claimed had the chance to clear into the Bristol half or boot it in the stand....

Disappointing that we couldn't see the game out.


Has Baldwin ever played in a back 3???????????????

We were in no danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
poolielad wrote:
under no threat!!!! reading some of the posts on here we were under the cosh second half... never listened to it but only going by people on here.........

Do you have different ears to everyone else....spock maybe,,,


Ears???? Eyes pal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
How many saves did flinders make in the2nd half. I couldn't give a fuck what people are saying on here, I'm guessing the vast majority were not there. Poolsworld does not paint the correct picture. We should not have changed the back four and that is a fact


oohhh... so your right then hey... cant believe you dont manage a premiership team!!

BTW..where you there??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
poolielad wrote:
under no threat!!!! reading some of the posts on here we were under the cosh second half... never listened to it but only going by people on here.........

Do you have different ears to everyone else....spock maybe,,,


Ears???? Eyes pal


oh ye... sorry never had my glasses on... ears are fucked without them...

But back on topic fatty...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Yes I'm a biggun. I'm not in denial was that abuse supposed to offend?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
Yes I'm a biggun. I'm not in denial was that abuse supposed to offend?



Not abuse.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Calling someone fatty isn't abusive?? I would think that's a personal attack


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:27 pm
Posts: 1589
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
For the second week in a row the game is won and pointless changes happen. Why the fuck was the defence changed there. We were clearing everything and in no way looked in threat.

Colin cooper cost us that game and seems out of his depth to me. Is he not watching what's happening. The back four was solid.


dunno if you know this but we won last week


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Nice one!! So on that note of we lose the next 30 games that's ok because we won last week.

What the fuck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:11 am
Posts: 719
Location: “It’s a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma,”
They are an honest bunch though! :roll:

_________________
Hartlepool always has been a tough town, a tough team, a tough area and I’m disappointed that we aren’t like that......MW 31-10-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
if being called fatty is classed as an attack then i feel truly sorry for Dibble!

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:27 pm
Posts: 1589
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
Nice one!! So on that note of we lose the next 30 games that's ok because we won last week.

What the fuck


you might not realise this but we didnt lose today


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
Calling someone fatty isn't abusive?? I would think that's a personal attack


ok so its personal attack... sctatchinghead so I am a fatty....gonna knock fuck out of myself..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 5661
Location: Following Hartlepool's number one golfist Tiger Woods
Grow up FFS!

_________________
Lard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I'm guessing that's aimed at me. Can you explain mr life


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 5661
Location: Following Hartlepool's number one golfist Tiger Woods
Its aimed at anyone who either bites at stuff or needs to add an insult to a post.

You're grown ups, unless the other poster is a loid its not called for.

_________________
Lard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
So coppers change cost us the game and yes I was there . We had a solid back 4 that didnt need changing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
alienlife wrote:
Its aimed at anyone who either bites at stuff or needs to add an insult to a post.

You're grown ups, unless the other poster is a loid its not called for.


hits "like" button


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
So coppers change cost us the game and yes I was there . We had a solid back 4 that didnt need changing.


we are really fucked if the old bill is picking the team... no wonder we never won!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
So coppers change cost us the game and yes I was there . We had a solid back 4 that didnt need changing.

so it wasn't Baldwin dwelling on the ball that cost us?

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
misterb2001 wrote:
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
So coppers change cost us the game and yes I was there . We had a solid back 4 that didnt need changing.

so it wasn't Baldwin dwelling on the ball that cost us?



rb reckons we never won cos howard and sweeney were not playing!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I'm guessing if Collins wasnt brought on Baldwin would have never been in that position could be wrong like bit after watching him clear everything I'm guessing he would have handled that attack


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
I'm guessing if Collins wasnt brought on Baldwin would have never been in that position could be wrong like bit after watching him clear everything I'm guessing he would have handled that attack


eh.... so it was collins fault baldwin fucked up... or was it the coppers faults....please explain!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:29 pm
Posts: 574
You can't blame an error from Baldwin on Collins being on the field, that is just clutching at straws.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 9787
Location: Just down the road from the Telstar
Soma wrote:
You can't blame an error from Baldwin on Collins being on the field, that is just clutching at straws.


It's what RB does so well!!

_________________
I like the comfort zone. It's where all the sandwiches are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 275
he is a strange on that birthmark chap...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:41 pm
Posts: 5661
Location: Following Hartlepool's number one golfist Tiger Woods
Soma wrote:
You can't blame an error from Baldwin on Collins being on the field, that is just clutching at straws.


Its inconsistency too, Howard and Walton are escape goats of choice this season. Howard was at home playing GTA5 so it must be down to Walton.

_________________
Lard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
id be happy for us to average 4 points every 2 games for the rest of the season, win at home draw away.

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: EX Hartlepool now in sunny Billingham
Yubep wrote:
id be happy for us to average 4 points every 2 games for the rest of the season, win at home draw away.
I would but when you could of had six!!!!! sadx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
I fail to see how people who wernt there have such an opinion. Its very hard to try and respond when there only argument is "radio" and "he said".

Personally I just watch and pay accordingly. My views are based upon what I actually see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 11141
Location: Hartlepool
your problem is, you like Baldwin, so you won't blame him despite it being him that was at fault for us not winning the match. Imagine if it was Howard at fault, you would have jizzed immediately.

Or you could blame James for not scoring a 1-on-1, or Burgess for not scoring with a free header.

Or we could just stop over analysing every fart and facial tic and just accept that we drew away from home and it's a good, but slightly disappointing point.

_________________
Aka Masturbate2001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Posts: 15342
We should go back to the days before subs. Boooooo booooooo booooooooo booooo. Sorry I mentioned subs. Ban them.

Without any subs and Sweeney with extra no Howard we'd Probably be looking at back to back promotions. At least.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 2107
Kids, don't drink and post.

_________________
I work in a Uni yer knar. Someone has to empty the bins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
Soma wrote:
You can't blame an error from Baldwin on Collins being on the field, that is just clutching at straws.


In not blaming Collins at all. We didnt need to change defensively. We were solid at the back. Burgess and Baldwin were clearing everything. Flinders had very little to do. James and burgess had the halfs 2 best chances which says alot. Going to 3 centre backs changed our system and in doing so IMO cost us the 3 points.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
The Fat Man wrote:
Kids, don't drink and post.


Can you explain what alcohol has to do with it? We had a game under control and changed things that didnt need changing. Am I not allowed to say this. Clutching at straws has been used in this thread and your quote seems to be doing just that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:31 am
Posts: 5637
misterb2001 wrote:
your problem is, you like Baldwin, so you won't blame him despite it being him that was at fault for us not winning the match. Imagine if it was Howard at fault, you would have jizzed immediately.

Or you could blame James for not scoring a 1-on-1, or Burgess for not scoring with a free header.

Or we could just stop over analysing every fart and facial tic and just accept that we drew away from home and it's a good, but slightly disappointing point.


violin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:51 am 
Ritchies birthmark wrote:

Can you explain what alcohol has to do with it? We had a game under control and changed things that didnt need changing. Am I not allowed to say this. Clutching at straws has been used in this thread and your quote seems to be doing just that.


Ritchie, yes, you're allowed to say it. Now you've said it. There's no need to hammer it home with a blunt instrument. People are getting alarmed that a heart attack is imminent.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:21 pm
Posts: 329
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
For the second week in a row the game is won and pointless changes happen. Why the fuck was the defence changed there. We were clearing everything and in no way looked in threat.

Colin cooper cost us that game and seems out of his depth to me. Is he not watching what's happening. The back four was solid.

I was at the game and have to agree it was a big mistake to change the back four when they had everything under control. Far better to push for the killer third goal by bringing on Poole and Rodney for the ineffective Compton and Monkhouse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 25266
How many pints had you had when you posted RB? Just out of interest like

_________________
Michaelbarron ‏@Mickyb22
@9howie yes defo I need my mate for golf and social ‪#bessiemate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:00 am
Posts: 20758
Baldwin needs to realise he ain't very good at passing and do the simple things like when wenger got hold of Keown and told him to start doing things simple and stop attempting Hollywood balls and fancy flicks.

Tackle, head it, clear it but for gods sake don't try to be a great passer because you never will be.

_________________
I'd recommend a more stealthy plan than googling 'afternoon tea dog'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 2107
Ritchies birthmark wrote:
The Fat Man wrote:
Kids, don't drink and post.


Can you explain what alcohol has to do with it? We had a game under control and changed things that didnt need changing. Am I not allowed to say this. Clutching at straws has been used in this thread and your quote seems to be doing just that.


Interesting that you thought I was commenting on your contributions to this thread. Get a sense of humour, the world will look a brighter place.

"The future's so bright, I've gotta wear shades."

_________________
I work in a Uni yer knar. Someone has to empty the bins.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Gadgies online

Dodgepots browsing this forum: Arthurpoolie, charlesI, Essex poolie, Flying Hogans, Hawklord, itwontwork, Kettering Poolie, Ozzy Saltburn, PTID and 145 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  







The Bunker. The only HUFC forum with correct spelling and grammar.